By Investment Research Team, Aug 13, 2017
Fixed Income: T-bill subscriptions improved during the week but remained undersubscribed for the 5th week in a row, coming in at 77.5%, compared to 40.5% recorded the previous week. The yields on the 91, 182 and 364-day papers remained unchanged at 8.2%, 10.3% and 10.9%, respectively;
Equities: During the week, the equities market was on an upward trend with NSE 20, NSE 25 and NASI gaining 5.3%, 4.4% and 4.3% taking their YTD performance to 24.8%, 24.7% and 23.7%, respectively. Family Bank released their H1’2017 results, recording a loss of Kshs 0.5 bn from a profit of Kshs 0.7 bn in H1'2016 attributed to a 37.0% decline in operating income, despite a 6.4% decline in operating expenses;
Private Equity: The private equity sector in the region remains robust with continued activity in the acquisitions and the fundraising fronts. During the week, three Danish Pension Funds; Pension Danmark, PKA and Medical Doctors’ Pension fund, together with A.P. Moller Holding, a holding company of Danish Based Shipping Company, A.P. Moller-Maersk, have set up a fund that will invest in infrastructure developments in Arica while a South African based Africa Rainbow Capital (ARC), committed to an acquisition of 20% stake in Rain, a South African fixed and mobile network provider, at an undisclosed amount;
Real Estate: Buildings approvals by the Nairobi City County Planning Compliance & Enforcement Department, dropped by 16.3%, between 2016 and 2017, in the period between January and May, as per the Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (KNBS) Leading Economic Indicators Survey, June 2017 issue;
Focus of the Week: This week, we look at the process of portfolio construction and the role of asset allocation and portfolio diversification in investment decision-making.
During the week, T-bills were undersubscribed for the 5th week in a row, despite the overall subscription rate improving to 77.5% from 40.5% recorded the previous week. The subscription rates for the 91, 182 and 364-day papers came in at 29.2%, 95.1% and 79.2% compared to 39.8%, 47.0% and 34.3% the previous week, respectively. Yields on the 91, 182 and 364-day papers remained unchanged at 8.2%, 10.3% and 10.9%, respectively, while the 182-day paper remains the most attractive on a risk-return proposition. The overall acceptance rate came in at 99.6% compared to 94.3% the previous week, with the government accepting a total of Kshs 18.5 bn of the Kshs 18.6 bn worth of bids received, against the Kshs 24.0 bn, which was on offer in this auction.
There was a net liquidity injection of Kshs 24.3 bn this week compared to a net withdrawal of Kshs 1.3 bn the previous week, on account of government payment and T-bill redemptions. Despite the improved liquidity position in the money market, the average interbank rate rose to 10.5% from 8.2% the previous week, attributable to skewed liquidity position in the market. The average volumes traded in the interbank market rose by 5.8% to Kshs 29.1 bn, from Kshs 27.5 bn the previous week. There was some T-bill rediscounting of Kshs 0.2 bn, which indicates that there are some players that faced significant liquidity challenges since rediscounting is very punitive and is usually done at the prevailing yields plus 3.0% points thus making the value of the discounted T-bills much lower than their market value.
Below is a summary of the money market activity during the week:
all values in Kshs bn, unless stated otherwise |
|||
Weekly Liquidity Position – Kenya |
|||
Liquidity Injection |
|
Liquidity Reduction |
|
Government Payments |
38.7 |
Transfer from Banks - Taxes |
19.4 |
T-bill Redemption |
26.3 |
T-bill (Primary issues) |
9.2 |
T-bill Rediscounts |
0.2 |
Reverse Repo Maturities |
2.5 |
Reverse Repo Purchases |
2.2 |
Term Auction Deposit |
10 |
Repos Maturities |
5.0 |
OMO Tap Sales |
7.0 |
Total Liquidity Injection |
72.4 |
Total Liquidity Withdrawal |
48.1 |
Net Liquidity Injection |
24.3 |
For the month of August, the government has issued a 5-year bond (FXD 1/2017/5) and re-opened a 10-year bond (FXD 1/2017/10) in a bid to raise Kshs 30.0 bn for budgetary support. The bonds have effective tenors of 5.0 years and 9.9 years, respectively. The government is behind on its domestic borrowing target for the current fiscal year, having borrowed Kshs 13.6 bn against a target of Kshs 36.7 bn (assuming a pro-rated borrowing target throughout the financial year of Kshs 317.7 bn budgeted for the full financial year). We expect investors to bid at a premium above the secondary market yields, which are at 12.3% and 13.0% for the 5.0-year and 9.9-year bonds, respectively, and we would therefore bid at a range of between 12.3% - 12.5% for the 5.0-year bond, and 13.0%-13.3% for the 9.9-year bond.
According to Bloomberg, yields on the 5-year and 10-year Eurobonds, with 2-years and 7-years to maturity, declined by 10 bps and 20 bps, respectively, to close at 4.2% and 6.3%, from 4.3% and 6.5% the previous week, respectively despite the fact that the country was conducting its general elections this week. Since the mid-January 2016 peak, yields on the Kenya Eurobonds have declined by 4.6% points and 3.3% points for the 5-year and 10-year Eurobonds, respectively, due to stable macroeconomic conditions in the country. The declining Eurobond yields and stable rating (Fitch Ratings having affirmed Kenya’s long-term foreign and local currency issuer default ratings (IDRs) at “B+”), are indications that Kenya’s macro-economic environment remains stable and hence an attractive investment destination.
The Kenya Shilling remained relatively stable during the week to close at Kshs 103.9, despite having hit a low of Kshs 104.0 on the eve of elections, due to last minute dollar demand from oil and retail importers. On a year to date basis, the shilling has depreciated against the dollar by 1.4%. The relative stability is because the dollar has also been depreciating against the other major currencies. Against the Euro, Yen and the Pound, the shilling has lost 13.8%, 8.6% and 6.8% YTD, respectively. The significant depreciation against the Euro, Yen and Pound is mainly because these currencies have appreciated against the Dollar as a result of weakening economic fundamentals in the US compared to the Eurozone, UK and Japan that have pushed further the expected path for the US interest rate hike cycle. In our view, the shilling should remain relatively stable to the dollar in the short term, supported by CBK’s activity; with the forex reserve levels currently at USD 7.4 bn (equivalent to 4.9 months of import cover) but we have seen forex reserves decline significantly from USD 8.3 bn at the pick in April this year.
According to the June 2017 Leading Economic Indicators report by the Kenya National Bureau of statistics (KNBS), the economic indicators under review points towards a stable economy given;
We still believe that the economy will remain stable in 2017, bearing in mind that the data released by KNBS points towards a stable outlook. Despite the stable review in the month, we expect to see a slower growth from last year due to a slowdown in agriculture and financial Intermediation, and we have seen the World Bank and IMF revise downwards the projections for this year to 5.5% and 5.3%, respectively. As per our Kenya 2017 GDP Growth and Outlook, we project that the economy will grow by 4.7%-5.2%% this year.
The country held its general election this week, which was relatively peaceful with the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (IEBC) undertaking its mandate with utmost diligence and transparency as per our expectations as highlighted in our focus note on the Post-Election Business Environment. Recently we have seen businesses go about their normal activities with caution and thus there has been subdued activity over the past one week but we expect this to normalise in the coming week as post-election fears and uncertainty dissipates, the president elect gets sworn in, and the government takes charge.
Rates in the fixed income market have remained stable, and we expect this to continue in the short-term. However, a budget deficit that is likely to result from depressed revenue collection creates uncertainty in the interest rates environment as any additional borrowing in the domestic market to plug the deficit could lead to upward pressures on interest rates. Our view is that investors should be biased towards short- to medium term fixed income instruments to reduce duration risk.
During the week, the equities market defied the elections and was on an upward trend with NSE 20, NSE 25 and NASI gaining 5.3%, 4.4% and 4.3%, respectively, taking their YTD performance to 24.8%, 24.7% and 23.7%, respectively. This week’s performance was driven by gains in select large cap stocks such as Equity Group, KCB Group and Safaricom, which gained 7.5%, 7.4% and 4.3%, respectively. Since the February 2015 peak, the market has lost 7.0% and 27.7% for NASI and NSE 20, respectively.
Equities turnover declined by 45.4% to close the week at USD 26.7 mn from USD 48.9mn the previous week. Foreign investors remained net sellers with a net outflow of USD 0.8 mn compared to a net outflow of USD 10.0 mn recorded the previous week. Foreign investor participation increased to 75.5% from 56.9% recorded the previous week. We expect the market to remain bullish despite the slower corporate earnings growth in 2017 and investor sentiment to be neutral as investors take advantage of the low stock valuations.
The market is currently trading at a price to earnings ratio (P/E) of 12.3x, versus a historical average of 13.4x, and a dividend yield of 5.1%, compared to a historical average of 3.8%. The current P/E valuation of 12.3x is 26.6% above the most recent trough valuation of 9.7x experienced in the first week of February 2017, and 47.8% above the previous trough valuation of 8.3x experienced in December 2011. The charts below indicate the historical P/E and dividend yields of the market.
Family Bank released their H1'2017 results, recording an after tax loss of Kshs 492.5 mn from a profit after tax of Kshs 711.5 mn in H1'2016. This is attributable to a 37.0% decline in total operating revenue to Kshs 3.0 bn from Kshs 4.8 bn in H1'2016, despite a 6.4% decline in total operating expenses to Kshs 3.6 bn from Kshs 3.8 bn in H1'2016. Key highlights for the performance from H1’2016 to H1’2017 include:
Family Bank has been experiencing a decline in interest income, with the decline in credit growth resulting in lower net margins from lending. In addition, the bank has not seen a pickup in Non Funded Income, with the fees it earns from loans being the hardest hit, declining by 45.2% to Kshs 169.9 mn from Kshs 310.0 mn in H1'2016. The performance of Family Bank could be attributed to the run suffered late last year owing to misleading allegations that the lender would be closed by the Central Bank of Kenya (CBK), and it seems to have not fully recovered from the flight. In our view, banks will still find it difficult to operate in this environment since pricing of risk has been limited to 4.0% above the Central Bank Rate. However, in a bid to reduce operating expenses and improve efficiency, we expect more emphasis on innovation, and agency banking, which will be a key driver for revenue diversification and efficient distribution channels.
Housing Finance Group has raised Kshs 3.0 bn in debt for an undisclosed tenor from international investors. The bank is expected to channel the debt towards general expense financing and in repaying the first tranche of the medium term note it issued in October 2010, worth Kshs 7.0 bn maturing on 2nd October 2017, which was used to fund business growth. Prior to issuing this debt, the bank had struggled with liquidity, which was at 21.4% in Q1’2017, 1.4% above the statutory requirements, and repayment of the bond would have put additional strain on the bank’s liquidity position. Given the additional debt funding, and liquid investments in cash and government securities amounting to Kshs 4.2 bn at Q1’2017, we are of the view that the bank will be able to repay the principal to bondholders and still remain sufficiently liquid to fund its operations.
According to the Capital Markets Soundness Report for the second quarter of 2017 by the Capital Markets Authority (CMA), CMA is in the process of developing a framework to ensure that all private offer transactions are made known to the authority. This implies that companies seeking to raise cash through sale of shares or short-term debt through private placements will be required to notify the regulator. CMA indicated in the report that the level of activity from private offerings market has been limited despite its significant potential for funding cash-strapped firms. This framework will see CMA enforce provisions in section 30c of the Act, which require that the Authority is notified through information notices by issuers raising funds through private offers. As such the regulator will be able to track the level of activity in the private space, and monitor trends driving the market. In our view, the impact of this framework will only be clear with time. On one hand, it can boost investor protection, as the regulator will be in a position to warn the public against investing in distressed companies. However, on the other hand, it can just serve to reduce the level of private offerings. Note that in advanced economies, the banks only fund 40% of business financing needs, with the balance, 60% coming from alternative and capital markets sources. In Kenya, the bank funding is at 95%, with alternative and capital markets funding accounting for only 5%, it is therefore imperative that we catalyse the alternative and capital markets funding, and increased regulation in that sector may not necessarily catalyse the alternatives and capital markets funding. Other key highlights that stood out in the report in regards to capital markets include market concentration risk, which as at June 2017, the top 10 listed companies in terms of market capitalization accounted for 80.5 % of the total market capitalization. We concur with the authority that this presents market concentration risk that needs to be addressed; the authority needs to take steps in conjunction with industry players to broaden the market in order to mitigate this risk through more listings of large cap entities or significant numbers of smaller and medium cap companies. In addition to making it easier to list, the timelines for approvals and turn around on engagements needs to be clear and predictable. As highlighted in our Cytonn Weekly #28/2017, the Capital Markets Authority (CMA) has done a fantastic job spearheading the introduction of new products such as Global Depositary Receipts and Global Depositary Notes thus providing faster and more convenient link to the market hence enabling market participants to exercise freedom of choice, which will in turn increase turnover. The market would also like to see more emphasis in expanding existing products.
Below is our Equities Universe of Coverage
all prices in Kshs unless stated otherwise |
||||||||
No. |
Company |
Price as at 04/08/17 |
Price as at 11/08/17 |
w/w Change |
YTD Change |
Target Price* |
Dividend Yield |
Upside/ (Downside)** |
1. |
NIC |
32.0 |
36.5 |
14.1% |
40.4% |
51.2 |
3.9% |
44.2% |
2. |
KCB Group*** |
40.5 |
43.5 |
7.4% |
51.3% |
54.0 |
7.4% |
31.5% |
3. |
I&M Holdings |
115.0 |
115.0 |
0.0% |
27.8% |
147.5 |
3.1% |
31.4% |
4. |
DTBK |
182.0 |
189.0 |
3.8% |
60.2% |
241.1 |
1.7% |
29.3% |
5. |
Barclays |
9.6 |
10.6 |
10.4% |
25.0% |
12.1 |
10.4% |
24.6% |
6. |
HF Group |
10.5 |
11.6 |
10.5% |
(17.1%) |
13.9 |
3.5% |
23.4% |
7. |
Co-op Bank |
15.6 |
16.2 |
3.9% |
22.3% |
18.5 |
5.0% |
19.5% |
8. |
Jubilee Insurance |
435.0 |
470.0 |
8.0% |
(4.1%) |
490.5 |
1.8% |
6.2% |
9. |
Stanbic Holdings |
80.0 |
81.0 |
1.3% |
14.9% |
77.0 |
5.9% |
0.9% |
10. |
Kenya Re |
21.5 |
22.0 |
2.3% |
(2.2%) |
20.5 |
4.4% |
(2.4%) |
11. |
Liberty |
12.8 |
13.5 |
5.9% |
2.3% |
13.0 |
0.0% |
(3.9%) |
12. |
StanChart |
221.0 |
230.0 |
4.1% |
21.7% |
209.3 |
4.7% |
(4.3%) |
13. |
Equity Group |
39.8 |
42.8 |
7.5% |
42.5% |
38.4 |
5.0% |
(5.1%) |
14. |
Britam |
14.2 |
14.9 |
5.3% |
49.0% |
13.2 |
1.8% |
(9.6%) |
15. |
Safaricom |
23.5 |
24.5 |
4.3% |
27.9% |
19.8 |
4.7% |
(14.6%) |
16. |
Sanlam Kenya |
27.5 |
27.8 |
0.9% |
0.9% |
21.1 |
0.0% |
(24.1%) |
17. |
CIC Group |
5.0 |
5.6 |
13.1% |
47.4% |
3.7 |
3.2% |
(30.6%) |
18. |
NBK |
9.6 |
11.0 |
15.2% |
52.8% |
4.0 |
0.0% |
(63.5%) |
*Target Price as per Cytonn Analyst estimates |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
**Upside / (Downside) is adjusted for Dividend Yield |
||||||||
***For full disclosure, Cytonn and/or its affiliates holds a significant stake in KCB Group, ranking as the 5th largest local institutional investor |
We remain "neutral with a bias to positive" for investors with short to medium-term investments horizon and are "positive" for investors with a long-term investment horizon.
On the Fundraising front
Three Danish Pension Funds; Pension Danmark, PKA and Medical Doctors’ Pension Fund, together with A.P. Moller Holding, a holding company of Danish Based shipping company, A.P. Moller-Maersk, have set up a fund that will invest in infrastructure development in Africa, focused in the transport and energy sector. The fund has received USD 550.0 mn in commitments from the partners and targets to achieve a total of USD 1.0 bn in commitments in the next 12 months. The fund targets to fund 10-15 infrastructural projects in the next decade and will be managed by former Maersk management members who have had experience in investments across Sub-Saharan African countries such as Nigeria and Ghana. Infrastructure investments remains an attractive venture given that in April 2017, Frontier Investments Management, a Danish private equity firm, raised USD 116.0 mn in the first close of its second fund, Frontier Energy II. The Fund is to finance greenfield renewable energy projects across the Sub-Sahara Africa region.
Acquisitions
Africa Rainbow Capital (ARC), a South African financial services firm, has committed to acquire 20% stake in Rain, a South African fixed and mobile network provider, for an undisclosed amount. The acquisition will (i) expand ARC’s presence in the telecommunication sector, having acquired 18.1% of Metrofibre, a South African based telecommunication company, in March 2016, and (ii) assist Rain to implement its expansion strategy to achieve 5,000 base station sites in South Africa in the next 3-years. The telecommunications sector remains robust in Sub- Sahara Africa as we witnessed the acquisition of 60% stake in Telkom Kenya Limited by Helios in June 2016. The growth in the sector is being supported by (i) improved regulatory frameworks by the relevant authorities that support competition hence growth in the sector, and (ii) growth of the middle class population with increasing numbers seeking quality voice and data services.
Private equity investments in Africa remains robust as evidenced by the increased deals. The increasing investor interest is attributed to (i) rapid urbanization, (ii) a resilient and adapting middle class and increased consumerism, (iii) the attractive valuations in Sub-Saharan Africa markets compared to global markets, and (iv) better economic projections in Sub Sahara Africa compared to global markets. We remain bullish on PE as an asset class in Sub-Sahara Africa. Going forward, the increasing investor interest and stable macro-economic environment will continue to boost deal flow into African markets.
During the week, Kenya National Bureau of Statistics released the leading economic indicators survey for June 2017. As per the report, the value of approved buildings declined significantly to Kshs 105.7 bn in the period January to May 2017, from Kshs 126.3 bn in the same period last year, representing a 16.3% drop. As per our earlier topical, Effects of the Election in the Real Estate Environment in Kenya, investors have a tendency to take a wait-and-see approach during the election period, hence the decline.
As shown below, the value of approved residential buildings experienced a 21.8% drop to Kshs 58.1 bn from Kshs 74.3 bn in 2016. Additionally, the value of non-residential approvals saw a decline of 8.5% to Kshs 47.6 bn from Kshs 52.0 bn in 2016. We attribute this mainly to i) reduced investment from the risk-averse investors due to the elections period, ii) constrained credit advancement from lending institutions and iii) the oversupply in certain themes like commercial office which as per our annual Cytonn Office Report, approximated an oversupply of 3.2 mn sqft of office space in 2017.
Below is a table showing value of approved building:
Year |
Residential |
Non-Residential |
Aggregate |
Change |
2013 |
40,006 |
37,756 |
77,762 |
24.5% |
2014 |
44,723 |
32,866 |
77,589 |
(0.2%) |
2015 |
52,717 |
28,586 |
81,303 |
4.8% |
2016 |
74,269 |
52,040 |
126,309 |
55.4% |
2017 |
58,063 |
47,623 |
105,686 |
(16.3%) |
From the table, building approvals for both sectors experienced the highest peak at 2016 and experiencing a sharp drop in 2017. This could be attributed to the prevailing tough macroeconomic conditions such as the interest rates cap law. However, the approvals had the highest increase in 2016 with a 55% growth, attributable to the great demand for affordable housing and availability of corporate tax relief for developers of the same as well as a growing economy and population. |
Source: KNBS Data
The decline in activity, however, is only temporary, and we expect it to stabilize in the near-term and increase in the medium-term, supported by the positive prospects of the real estate sector, which include i) large and growing population, ii) expanding middle class, iii) increased foreign investor participation, and iv) demand for institutional grade development properties, all pointing towards increased real estate development. The residential sector should resume its positive growth curve as well due to the increased incentives from the government to encourage developers to provide housing solutions.
Stanlib Fahari I-REIT, on 31st July 2017, released their H1’2017 earnings, posting earnings per unit of Kshs 0.43 for the 6-month period ending June 2017 realizing a 220.8% y/y growth from Kshs 0.13 in H1’2016. This was mainly attributable to a 30.0% decline in operating expenses to Kshs 112.5 mn from Kshs 160.8 mn in H1’2016 and a 14.2% increase in rental income to Kshs 138.0 mn from Kshs 120.9 mn in H1’2016 attributed to the rental income generated by the 3 real estate assets they manage; Greenspan Mall, Bay Holdings and Signature International Properties. The decline in expenses was because of the one-off set up and listing costs such as promotional and marketing expenses incurred in H1’2016, In addition, the REIT has no debt, thus no financing costs compared to the previous period, which had Kshs 23.0 mn in financing costs. The REIT manager did not recommend the distribution of an interim dividend. From our projections, the REIT has a 5.9% dividend yield at market price, assuming a 92% pay-out from its distributable earnings, similar to the 2016 dividend pay-out. This is an improvement from the last year performance, which saw the REIT deliver a yield of 4.3 %. However, this is still low compared to the market average of 10.0% rental yield for retail space and 9.3% yield for office space.
The graph below shows a comparative analysis for pre-tax yields for various sectors against the I-REIT’S.
*Banking and Insurance Sector calculated as dividend yield weighted by Market Capitalization
*Residential sector calculated excluding a 10% property management fee
*Retail and Office sector yields calculated from rent excluding service charge
*Fahari i-REIT dividend yield calculated as 92% pay-out from projected 2017 earnings as a percentage of price as at 11th August 2017
For a more comprehensive analysis, see our Stanlib Fahari REIT Earnings’ Note here.
We expect the real estate sector to stabilize once the government settles down and further supported by continued interest from multinational firms, improvement in the legal environment and the growth of the country’s GDP.
As investors, we all want our investments to grow and deliver higher risk adjusted returns despite the prevailing economic environment brought about by the cyclical nature of investments markets due to varying macroeconomic factors like politics, inflation, country growth and others. For long-term successful investment, it is important for an investor to have and adhere to an investment plan, and one fundamental pillar of that plan should be an asset allocation that ensures portfolio diversification, and which is aimed at attaining the investors’ objectives.
So how do we go about constructing a diversified portfolio? To start off, we first have to consider an analysis of the investor’s investment objectives and constraints in order to inform the investment strategy. This planning step involves taking a number of factors into consideration, but primarily the following 7 factors:
After analyzing an investor’s investment constraints, the next step is to construct the investment portfolio, taking into account the need to diversify. Diversification is a risk management technique that aims to minimize risk in a portfolio by spreading investments across a range of securities and asset classes, with the notion that a single negative event will not adversely affect all securities held in the same way and to the same degree. Diversification comes from the time-tested analogy - “don’t put all your eggs in one basket”. The rationale behind this contends that a portfolio constructed of different kinds of investments will, on average, yield higher returns and pose a lower risk than any individual investment within the portfolio. Where an investor has significant conviction on a certain asset class or security then one can hold a more concentrated portfolio.
In order to diversify your portfolio, you can invest in a variety of asset classes, which include:
The main thing to get right is to ensure that at all times the investors understands the risk levels of the issuer and ensure their ability to pay is sound.
As investors buy into companies, they should ensure that they understand the long-term prospect of the company and they buy in at the right valuations. Always good to know that a good company does not automatically translate to a good stock, and conversely, a bad company does not automatically translate to a bad stock, we have to factor in valuations.
Diversification has many proven benefits, however, it does not guarantee an investor protection against a loss. In addition, diversification does not reduce the systematic risk of investing in a particular market. This systematic risk is what is referred to as non- diversifiable risk or market risk. It is the risk not associated to a particular company or industry. Non- diversifiable risks include (i) inflation rate risk, (ii) exchange rate risk, (iii) political instability risk, and (iv) interest rate risk. They are the risks investors must accept willingly in order to invest.
In conclusion, the potential complexity associated with considering all these factors in an investment strategy requires a disciplined approach. This can be challenging especially if you are not involved in investment management on a daily basis and hence the need to partner with an investment professional, who will assist in coming up with your own specific investment portfolio. The first step could be the generation of an Investment Policy Statement (IPS). The IPS serves as a strategic guide to the planning and implementation of an investment program, and is highly customized to meet specific investors’ investment constraints. The investment professional should also help with the actual construction of the portfolio and security picking. In addition, the investment professional will periodically review your portfolio to allow for rebalancing back to your target allocation. Investors should take an active role in managing the portfolio to analyze their individual investments and determine if they are worth holding, since a well-diversified portfolio reduces risk without sacrificing returns. At all times investors should have an inquisitive approach to investments to ensure the partner understands where they want to get to and if there are any changes in circumstances, they are captured quite early.
On the run up to the elections we saw many investors taking a wait and see approach to investment, with most of them holding cash and cash equivalent investments, which have lower risk and stable returns. However, some investors saw this as an opportunity to jump in on the perceived riskier assets like equities and real estate at an attractive price. As can been seen from the performance of the equities market, the index has really gone up with NASI increasing by 4.3% during the week, and we expect to see a strong come back in the real estate sector as well.
For investors, getting the right investment partner is key to achieving one’s investment goals. Also making the right investment decision at the right time goes a long way alongside diversification in getting the best returns.