By Cytonn Research Team, Apr 2, 2017
Most of the global economies registered lower economic growth in 2016 with China, the US and the Eurozone registering growth of 6.7%, 1.6% and 1.7%, compared to 6.9%, 2.6% and 2.0%, respectively in 2015. The commodities markets remained vibrant with oil prices declining 7.0% during the quarter to USD 52.8 per barrel from USD 56.8 per barrel at the end of December 2016, driven by concerns of oversupply, despite expectations that OPEC members could extend their oil production cut agreement up until the end of 2017. The global stock market indices ended the quarter positive, with the MSCI World Index gaining 6.3% during the quarter as compared to 1.9% in the last quarter of 2016.
Below is the summary of the key happenings in the first quarter per region:
The US Fed raised the Federal Funds Rate by 25 bps to a bound of 0.75% - 1.00% in March, in line with our expectations of a 25 bps increase as per our Cytonn Weekly #10/2017. The decision by the Fed to hike rates was on the back of (i) relatively stable economic growth, with expectations of 2.1% growth in 2017 and 2018, despite GDP figures coming in at 1.6% in FY?2016, (ii) the continued strengthening of the labour market, given that the unemployment rate is at 4.7%, which is considered full employment level, and (iii) increasing inflation, with core inflation having hit a 2-year high of 1.8%, while headline inflation came in at 2.7%. In addition to this first hike of the year, the Fed is expected to hike rates twice more during the year, given the positive economic growth expected in 2017.
The stock market has been buoyant, with S&P 500 having gained 5.6% in Q1?2017, attributed to huge gains in the technology and financial services sectors, on optimism of pro-growth policies from the current Trump administration. In terms of valuations, the Cyclically Adjusted Price/Earnings (CAPE) ratio is currently at 29.1x, higher than the historical mean of 16.7x, an indication that the market is overvalued.
We expect the US market to remain supported by a strong labor market that will spur consumption and GDP growth in the economy. The key risk remains political as it is increasingly clear that the Trump administration may not be able to implement some of the campaign promises.
The stimulus package by the European Central Bank (ECB) seems to be bearing some fruits as the region saw an increase in the GDP growth with the 2016 growth coming in at 1.7% compared to the 0.7% average over the last five-years, and for the first time since 2008, grew faster than the US. The labor market has been recovering with the unemployment rate dropping to 9.6% at the end of the year from 10.5% in 2015. Despite the vote to exit the Eurozone in form of Brexit, the UK is still in discussions on how the actual exit will happen.
The ECB met in March and maintained the base lending rate at 0.0%, and the rates on the marginal lending facility and deposit facility at 0.25% and (0.40%), respectively. The current negative investment rates are expected to persist in 2017 and impact growth and investment positively, largely in the financial services sector. Moreover, inflation fell below the ECB?s target to 1.5% in March, down from 2.0% in February, and may serve to justify the bank?s quantitative easing initiatives.
The stock markets in Europe registered gains, with EuroStoxx 300 index rising 5.3%, while FTSE 100 gained 2.8%. This was supported by improved business sentiment in the Eurozone this year, on account of stronger domestic demand, a weaker Euro that boosted exports, and a pickup in manufacturing, with the Eurozone?s flash PMI rising to 56.2 in March, from 55.4 previously.
A key risk to the region comes in the form of political risk, with two of the region?s largest economies, France and Germany, set to hold elections in April and September, respectively, with both countries having been targets of violent attacks in 2016. Despite the uncertainty expected to be brought about by Brexit, elections in major economies and the migrant crisis, the region?s growth, albeit slow, is expected to persist on account of (i) an accommodative monetary policy, and (ii) private consumption driven by expected employment growth and higher wages.
The Chinese economy grew by 6.7% in 2016 compared to 6.9% in 2015 and the average of 7.9% over the last five-years. The growth was supported by an increase in private consumption and a pickup in the industrial sector, boosted by a recovery in commodity prices and increased investment in infrastructure. According to the IMF, China is projected to grow at 6.5% in 2017, 30 bps above the 6.2% forecasted in October 2016, with expectations for 2018 maintained at 6.0%.
Shanghai Composite gained 3.8% in Q1?2017, while trade data in February indicated that exports fell 1.3% y/y, with imports increasing 38.1% over the same period, which saw China end up with a rare trade deficit of USD 9.2 bn, following a surplus of USD 51.4 bn recorded in January, as a construction boom pushed imports for raw materials much higher than expected. Despite this, the continued implementation of structural reforms should help China overcome risks that include weak global demand for exports, falling investment in the manufacturing sector and a slowdown in credit growth.
China?s importance to the global economy remains significant, with the country contributing a third to global GDP growth in 2016, hence any sway in the economy will lead to a ripple effect that will be felt worldwide.
Sub Saharan Africa recorded the slowest growth in over two decades in 2016 at 1.5%, compared to 3.4% in 2015. This was as a result of a slowdown in some of the largest economies in the region such as Nigeria and Angola, which contracted by 1.5% in FY?2016, due to heavy reliance on oil, given the lower oil prices that prevailed in 2016. However, as highlighted in our Annual Market Outlook 2017, Sub Saharan Africa?s economic performance is expected to improve in 2017, with growth projected to come in at 2.9% and 3.6% in 2018, according to the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The East Africa region is expected to deliver the highest growth rate in 2017, supported by infrastructural expenditure. Sub-Saharan Africa?s projected 2017 growth rates per region are highlighted in the table below.
Africa GDP Growth Rates |
|||||
Region |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016e |
2017f |
East Africa |
6.40% |
7.00% |
6.80% |
7.00% |
7.20% |
Sub-Saharan Africa ex. Nigeria, SA |
6.50% |
5.70% |
4.70% |
3.90% |
4.90% |
Sub-Saharan Africa |
5.20% |
5.10% |
3.40% |
1.50% |
2.90% |
South Africa (SA) |
2.30% |
1.60% |
1.30% |
0.10% |
0.80% |
Global Growth Rate |
2.90% |
3.40% |
3.20% |
3.10% |
3.40% |
Source-IMF |
|
|
|
|
|
Below is a review of the key economic drivers during the quarter:
Global commodity prices have been stable but are expected to rise going forward. Most commodities registered gains in Q1?2017, namely metals, agriculture and select energy sources such as coal, whose prices were up 5.9%, 2.4% and 1.5%, respectively, according to the World Bank Commodity Prices Index. However, oil prices declined by 7.0% owing to oversupply from the US shale oil market. The recovery in commodity prices will consequently enhance the stability of the commodity-dependent economies such as Nigeria, Ghana, and other oil and metal exporting nations in Sub-Saharan Africa. Despite the performance of commodity prices, the recovery of these commodity driven economies will also require fiscal and monetary policy actions in order to support their foreign exchange markets and foster the recovery of their current account position. Below is a chart showing the performance of select commodity prices.
Regional currencies registered mixed performance during the quarter driven by different country specific fundamentals that drive the economies. Economies that are reliant on metals and minerals registered the highest gains attributed to a rise of 5.9% in metal prices. Currencies of economies that are heavy net oil importers weakened, due to the global strengthening of the dollar after the US rate hike in December 2016 and March 2017. Below is a table showing the performance of select African currencies.
Select Sub Saharan Africa Currency Performance vs USD |
|||||
Currency |
Mar-16 |
Dec-16 |
Mar-17 |
YTD Change (%) |
Last 12 months |
Zambian Kwacha |
10,930.1 |
9,938.0 |
9,675.0 |
2.6% |
11.3% |
South African Rand |
14.8 |
13.7 |
13.5 |
2.1% |
11.2% |
Botswana Pula |
10.8 |
10.7 |
10.5 |
1.9% |
3.1% |
Mauritius Rupee |
35.1 |
36.0 |
35.3 |
1.9% |
(0.6%) |
Malawian Kwacha |
675.4 |
727.4 |
725.2 |
0.3% |
7.4% |
Nigerian Naira |
199.1 |
315.0 |
314.6 |
0.1% |
(58.3%) |
Kenyan Shilling |
101.6 |
102.5 |
102.9 |
(0.4%) |
(1.5%) |
Ugandan Shilling |
3,365.0 |
3,596.5 |
3,615.0 |
(0.5%) |
(7.7%) |
Tanzanian Shilling |
2182.0 |
2,181.0 |
2,232.0 |
(2.3%) |
(2.7%) |
Ghanaian Cedi |
3.8 |
4.2 |
4.4 |
(2.8%) |
(14.2%) |
Yields on African Eurobonds have continued to decline, highlighting the improved investor sentiment owing to improving macro-economic conditions and a relatively stable political landscape. During the quarter, Nigeria successfully raised USD 1.0 bn through its third Eurobond at a yield of 7.9%, with a tenor of 15-years, recording more than 7.0x subscription level. Prior to this, Ghana raised USD 750.0 mn, in September 2016, through its 5th Eurobond at a yield of 9.3%, with a weighted average tenor of 5-years, recording more than 5.0x subscription level. This indicates the high appetite for Frontier markets securities. Below is a graph depicting the Eurobond performance of select African sovereign bonds.
Sub-Saharan African stock market performance has shown improvement with majority of the markets recording positive returns during the quarter. This can be attributable to (i) higher economic performance brought about by improved commodity prices, and (ii) renewed investor interest following attractive valuations on most stocks in these countries making them attractive to long-term investors. Below is a summary of the performance of key exchanges:
Equities Market Performance (Dollarized) |
|||
Country |
Dec-17 |
Mar-17 |
YTD Change (%) |
Ghana |
395.57 |
436.26 |
10.3% |
Malawi |
18.31 |
20.14 |
10.0% |
Zambia |
421.70 |
460.97 |
9.3% |
South Africa |
3,688.08 |
4,007.17 |
8.7% |
Tanzania |
1.01 |
1.04 |
3.0% |
Uganda |
0.41 |
0.42 |
2.1% |
Rwanda |
0.15 |
0.16 |
0.1% |
Kenya |
1.30 |
1.28 |
(1.8%) |
BRVM |
0.47 |
0.46 |
(2.0%) |
Nigeria |
85.32 |
82.74 |
(3.0%) |
We maintain our view that infrastructural spending, stable commodity prices, and political stability will be the key drivers for Sub-Saharan Africa region growth.
The Kenyan economy is still on a firm footing supported by continued investment in infrastructure and real estate, the growth in the financial sector and the recovery of the tourism sector. Despite the positive sentiment, there are a couple of challenges facing the economy, among them being the ongoing drought, political risk as we head into the election and increasing oil prices that may lead to a weakening shilling. The government in a bid to support the economy presented a very expansionary budget last week. The budget was themed ?Creating Jobs, Delivering a Better Life for All Kenyans?. There was a 2.4% increase in the budget to Kshs 2.3 tn from the Kshs 2.2 tn FY 2016/17 budget, as per the Budget announcement speech made by Cabinet Secretary to the National Treasury, Henry Rotich, with the bulk of it being financed by tax collection.
Key highlights as regards to financing the Budget were:
The tax incentives are a commendable effort by the government as it indicates that the operating environment will improve going forward.
The following table looks at the Kenya National Budget growth in the last 5-years, highlighting the changes from fiscal year 2016/17 to the 2017/18 budget estimates:
all figures in Kshs bns unless stated otherwise |
|||||||||
Kenya National Budget Change to 2017/18 from 2016/17 and 5-Year Growth |
|||||||||
Items |
2011/12 |
2012/13 |
2013/14 |
2014/15 |
2015/16 |
2016/17 |
2017/18 est. |
% Change (2016/17 - 2017/18) |
5-Year Growth |
Nominal GDP |
3,295.2 |
3,866.5 |
4,164.6 |
5,719.1 |
6,520.5 |
7,435.2 |
8,284.3 |
11.4% |
151.4% |
Revenue & grants |
|||||||||
Total revenue & grants |
854.5 |
984.7 |
1,098.3 |
1,231.0 |
1,431.6 |
1,566.9 |
1,763.3 |
12.5% |
106.4% |
Expenditure |
|||||||||
Recurrent & county allocation |
697.5 |
781.9 |
1,041.9 |
1,171.8 |
1,280.9 |
1,502.5 |
1,646.2 |
9.6% |
136.0% |
Development |
385.2 |
370.2 |
428.7 |
634.8 |
717.6 |
729.8 |
640.8 |
(12.2%) |
66.3% |
Total expenditure |
1,082.7 |
1,152.1 |
1,470.6 |
1,806.7 |
1,998.5 |
2,232.3 |
2,287.0 |
2.4% |
111.2% |
Budget -deficit/+surplus |
(228.2) |
(167.4) |
(372.3) |
(575.6) |
(567.0) |
(665.4) |
(523.7) |
(21.3%) |
129.5% |
% of GDP |
(6.9%) |
(4.3%) |
(8.9%) |
(10.1%) |
(8.7%) |
(8.9%) |
(6.3%) |
2.6% |
0.6% |
Deficit Financing |
|||||||||
Net external borrowing |
166.1 |
60.7 |
238.8 |
261.2 |
340.5 |
382.7 |
206.0 |
(46.2%) |
24.0% |
Domestic borrowing |
62.1 |
106.7 |
133.5 |
314.5 |
226.4 |
282.7 |
317.7 |
12.4% |
411.6% |
Total financing |
228.2 |
167.4 |
372.3 |
575.6 |
567.0 |
665.4 |
523.7 |
(21.3%) |
129.5% |
Key points to note from the table above are:
The Kenyan budget has always been expansionary, with no single year when the budget has been less than the previous years. However, we foresee the government facing these challenges in budget implementation, as has been in past years: (i) under-absorption of development expenditure, which has averaged 65.0%, and over-absorption of recurrent expenditure which has averaged 103.5% leaving the overall budget absorption rate below 100.0% consistently in the last 5 fiscal years, (ii) failure to meet revenue collection targets by the Kenya Revenue Authority, which is projected to rise to Kshs 1.7 tn in 2017/18, from Kshs 1.5 tn in 2016/17, after having missed its first half of the fiscal year target by 3.2%, and (iii) high budget deficit being plugged in by debt, especially external dollar denominated debt and resulting in a rising debt-to-GDP ratio. We are of the view that the government should put in place structural measures to address these challenges in order to ensure the budget policy items are actually well implemented. In addition, KRA needs to address a number of areas, including (i) streamlining tax collection, and allowing for efficient payment of taxes, and (ii) taxation of the informal sector in order to achieve their tax collection targets, to boost revenue collection and reduce the pressure on borrowings.
The Kenya Shilling depreciated against the US Dollar by 0.5% during the quarter to close at Kshs 103.0 from Kshs 102.5 at the end of 2016, due to global dollar strengthening as the Fed continues on its monetary tightening cycle. This week, the shilling depreciated against the US dollar by 0.1% w/w to close at Kshs 103.0 from Kshs 102.9 due to increased dollar demand from oil importers. The forex reserve level has increased to 5.1 months import cover from 4.6 months recorded at the end of 2016, on account of the receipt of the Kshs 82.3 bn syndicated loan last week. This is a significant rise given the foreign reserves had stabilized at 4.6 months throughout the quarter. Going forward, we expect the shilling to come under pressure from (i) global strengthening of the dollar due to planned rate hikes during the year, and (ii) recovery of global oil prices. However, with the current forex reserve level, the CBK will be able to support the shilling in the short term.
The inflation rate for Q1?2017 increased to 10.3% in March from 6.4% in December 2016. This was above our projections of 9.5% - 9.8% for the month of March. The rise in inflation was driven by (i) an increase in food prices, which rose 8.2% during the quarter, on account of the prevailing drought in the country, and (ii) transport prices, which rose 1.6% during the quarter, despite a notable decrease in the cost of diesel in January. We expect upward inflationary pressure to persist in the first half of 2017, and average 8.6% over the course of the year, which is above the upper bound of the government target range of 2.5%-7.5%, and this is despite the expectation that the food situation is expected to improve in the second half of 2017.
The Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) met twice during the quarter, on 30th January and on 27th March, and in both meetings, the MPC decided to maintain the CBR at 10.0% backed by (i) the prevailing stable macroeconomic conditions despite the rise in inflation to 10.3% in March, (ii) the relative stability of the currency supported by foreign exchange reserves of USD 7.7 bn representing 5.1 months of import cover, and (iii) the resilience of the banking sector with average liquidity and capital adequacy ratios at 43.2% and 19.7%, both above statutory requirements of 20.0% and 14.5%, respectively. Going forward, we expect the MPC to take note of the impact of the interest rate cap on private sector credit growth and economic growth. This assessment will be key in informing the next action to be taken by the MPC.
Private sector credit growth has been declining from highs of 21.0% in August 2015 to lows of 4.0% in March 2017 according to the CBK. This slow growth can be attributed to (i) an increase in investor participation in government securities, thus leading to a crowding out effect in the private sector, and (ii) an increase in commercial bank non-performing loans (NPLs) that has discouraged banks from lending to the private sector and instead preferred to lend to the government that is considered risk free. The new loan pricing framework brought about by the interest rate cap was a new factor that was perceived to worsen the situation, however, the Kenya Bankers Association and the CBK are to jointly carry out an assessment of the impact of the Banking (Amendment) Act, 2015 on private sector credit growth and economic growth. From the results of the assessment, they shall take a view on steps to be taken going forward. This in our view is commendable and a step in the right direction in terms of getting to the root cause and addressing it in order to revamp private sector credit growth which will be good for the economy going forward.
The table below summarizes the various macroeconomic factors, the expectation at the beginning of 2017, the actual 2017 experience YTD, and the impact of the same, and our expectations going forward:
Summary of Macro Economic Indicators |
|||||
Indicators |
2017 Expectations |
YTD 2017 Experience |
Going Forward |
Outlook - Beginning of the year |
Outlook |
GDP |
GDP growth of 5.4%-5.7% |
We still expect 2016 GDP to come in at 5.5% ? 6.0%. IMF, WB and Treasury expect GDP to come in at 6.0% |
We expect GDP growth for 2017 to come in at 5.4% - 5.7%, a slight decline from the expected 2016 growth of 6.0% |
Neutral |
Neutral |
Interest Rates |
A stable outlook on interest rates in 2017 with the CBR maintained at 10.0% |
The CBK has maintained the CBR at 10.0%. KRA missed their first half of FY 2016/17 target by 3.2% and is expected to meet the Kshs 1.5 tn overall target. Government has borrowed Kshs 236.8 bn ahead of its pro-rated target of Kshs 176.6 bn |
The interest rate environment is expected to remain relatively stable with the CBK not accepting higher yields on treasury securities and the MPC maintaining the CBR at 10.0%. There however seems to be an upward pressure on interest rates due to government borrowing pressure |
Neutral |
Neutral |
Inflation |
Expected to average 7.2%, within the 2.5%-7.5% government target |
Inflation increased to 10.3% in March from 6.4% in December mainly due to effects of the drought causing a 8.2% increase in food prices and increase in petrol and diesel pump prices causing a 1.6% increase in transport costs |
We expect upward inflationary pressure to persist in the 1st half of 2017, averaging 8.6% over the course of the year, above the 7.5% upper bound government target. This is despite the expectation that the food situation will improve in the 2nd half of 2017 |
Neutral |
Negative |
Exchange Rate |
Shilling to depreciate against major currencies |
The shilling has depreciated by 0.5% against the dollar YTD on account of increased dollar demand from oil importers and strengthening of the US dollar after the March Fed rate hike, despite retail goods importers coupled with dollar inflows from foreign investors and horticultural produce exporters |
We expect the currency to depreciate against the dollar driven by (i) global strengthening of the dollar as the Fed plans to increase the pace of rate hike in 2017, and (ii) recovery of the global oil prices. However, it is important to note that the CBK has sufficient reserves (equivalent to 5.1 months of import cover) to support the shilling in the short term |
Negative |
Neutral |
Corporate Earnings |
Corporate earnings growth of 8.0% in 2017 due to lower earnings for commercial banks attributed to the cap on interest rates |
Several companied so far have released mixed FY?2016 results, mainly banking sector (listed) with weighted average growth in core EPS of 4.4% from 2.3% in FY?2015, below our 2016 expectation of 12.5% |
We still expect corporate earnings to be worse than 2016, exhibiting decline in profits owing to slower private sector credit growth at 4.0% and effects of the cap on interest rates. We expect corporate earnings growth of 8.0% in 2017 with cheaper multiples than historical average |
Neutral with a bias to positive |
Neutral with a bias to positive |
Investor Sentiments |
Foreign investors to demand higher premiums due to political risks posed by elections and economic risk due to the planned rate hikes by the US Fed |
Investor sentiment has been high with foreign investors being net buyers throughout the year with inflows of USD 17.3 mn |
Political and economic risks on frontier markets still remains a risk, however, we expect long term investors to enter the market seeking to take advantage of the current low valuations |
Neutral |
Neutral |
Security |
Expect the government to put initiatives in place to ensure improved security, however, the 2017 election remains a challenge |
In January, the U.S. Department of State issued a travel warning regarding threats by Al-Shabaab on the Somalia border, coastal and north-eastern counties. In March, the U.K government issued a warning due to security concerns in parts of Laikipia County |
Security is expected to be tight as we head towards the elections with the government expected to keep this in check. However, uncertainty still exists due to the August elections |
Neutral |
Neutral |
Of the seven macroeconomic indicators that we follow, 2 have changed: (i) inflation has turned negative from neutral, and (ii) exchange rate has turned neutral from negative. From this, we can conclude that the operating environment will remain stable but economic growth in 2017 will decline from that which was experienced in 2016.
The first quarter of 2017 was characterized by T-bill oversubscriptions, with the overall subscription rate decreasing to 106.6% from 113.1% in the last quarter of 2016. Overall subscriptions for the 91, 182, and 364-day papers for the quarter came in at 89.2%, 193.2% and 142.2%, respectively. The 182-day paper has not been on offer for the last 4-weeks, though its last recorded yield remained unchanged at 10.5%, from 10.5% at end of 2016. The 182-day paper was withdrawn with the aim of managing maturities by spreading risk concentration evenly across all three papers. This saw investor interest being skewed towards the 364-day paper in the last two months of the quarter as it offered a higher return on a risk-adjusted basis. Yields on T-bills were relatively unchanged in Q1?2017, closing at 8.8% and 10.9%, from 8.6% and 11.0% for the 91 and 364-day papers, respectively, at the end of 2016.
During the week, T-bills were oversubscribed, with overall subscription coming in at 122.5%, compared to 145.6% recorded the previous week, with the subscription rate on the 91-day paper increasing to 112.2% from 88.1%, and that of the 364-day papers decreasing to 132.8% from 203.1%, the previous week. Yields on the 91 and 364-day T-bills remained relatively unchanged during the week, coming in at 8.8% and 10.9%, respectively.
In the recent T-Bill auctions, there has been upward pressure on interest rates and this pressure has been more on the 91-day paper, as it currently offers a negative real return of 1.6%. However, the government has remained disciplined throughout the year, rejecting bids that are considered as above market, as indicated by (i) the lower acceptance rate for the 91-day paper at 63.1% as compared to the 364-day paper at 70.0%, and (ii) the high variance between the market average yield and the accepted average yield for the 91-day T-bill at 0.2%, compared to 0.0% for the 364-day papers, respectively.
Treasury Bills Yields and Variance |
||
91-day |
364-day |
|
Market Weighted Average Yield* |
8.9% |
10.9% |
Weighted Average Accepted Yield* (a) |
8.7% |
10.9% |
Variance |
0.2% |
0.0% |
Inflation rate (as at March) (b) |
10.3% |
10.3% |
Average Real Return (a-b) |
(1.6%) |
0.6% |
Acceptance Rate |
63.1% |
70.0% |
*Average Yield for the last 4 auctions |
The 91-day T-bill is therefore currently trading below its 5-year average of 9.9% as can be seen on the graph below:
During the quarter, the Kenyan Government offered 3 Treasury bonds, one in each month with details in the table below:
No. |
Date |
Bond Auctioned |
Effective Tenor to Maturity (years) |
Coupon |
Amount to be Raised (Kshs bn) |
Actual Amount Raised (Kshs bn) |
Average Accepted Yield |
Acceptance Rate |
1. |
30/01/2017 |
FXD 2/2007/15 (re-open) |
5.4 |
13.5% |
30.0 |
- |
Auction Cancelled |
- |
2. |
27/02/2017 |
IFB 1/2017/12 |
8.8 |
12.5% |
30.0 |
13.6 |
13.6% |
17.1% |
3. |
27/03/2017 |
FXD 2/2014/5 (re-open) |
2.2 |
11.9% |
30.0 | 20.5 |
12.4% |
41.4% |
4. |
27/03/2017 |
FXD 3/2013/5 (re-open) |
1.7 |
12.0% |
30.0 |
19.7 |
11.8% |
36.2% |
During the quarter, investors showed a preference for short to medium term papers. In the month of January, the bond on offer, which was the FXD 2/2007/15 (re-open) was cancelled. This was an indication that either (i) investors bid at yields that the CBK considered unrealistically above market, or (ii) subscription rates for the bond were low as a result of the tight liquidity that had characterized the money market since the beginning of the year. The February infrastructural bond tap sale had a low subscription rate of 33.5% with a tax-adjusted yield of 14.7%, which was higher than the prevailing market rate at the time of 13.6% for a 9-year bond. Furthermore, the March auction was oversubscribed at an overall subscription of 214.2%, with the CBK accepting Kshs 24.9 bn and opening a tap sale to raise the remaining Kshs 5.1 bn. Contrary to the previous tap sale, this one was oversubscribed at 300.3%, keeping in mind that this auction had bonds with an average effective tenor to maturity of 2-years, lower than that of the IFB which had 8.8-years to maturity.
We are therefore of the view that this was an indication of investors keeping short to medium term due to the uncertainty around the interest rate environment.
East African Breweries Limited (EABL) offered a second tranche of its Kshs 11.0 bn Domestic Medium Term Note Programme that had been approved in 2015, offering an additional Kshs 6.0 bn worth of notes. The five-year note was priced at a yield of 14.2%, which is a premium of 0.8% above the same tenor treasury paper that is currently trading at 13.4%. In our view, this is a low risk premium as we would normally expect at least a 200 bps premium above government paper. However, the offer was highly oversubscribed at 141.0% subscription rate. The funds will go towards restructuring its balance sheet by retiring short term debt, and capital expenditure aimed at building capacity for the company.
The Kenya National Treasury launched its mobile-phone bond auction platform, ?M-Akiba??, following its postponement in October 2015, with the Central Depository & Settlement Corporation (CDSC) acting as the agent, and Safaricom and Airtel as the mobile virtual network operators. The M-Akiba platform is expected to raise Kshs 5.0 bn. The pilot issue that sought to raise Kshs 150.0 mn has so far managed to raise Kshs 75.2 mn, representing 50.1% of the target. The money would go towards infrastructure development, through the three-year fixed coupon retail infrastructure bond that will pay investors a tax-free interest income of 10.0% p.a., translating to 11.5% when adjusted for tax. The sale period closes on 11th April, from where it shall be traded on the Nairobi Securities Exchange (NSE) via mobile phone, with the NSE acting as the market maker. The effort is commendable as we believe that the platform will open the bond market to low income investors. This is also a pioneering initiative to trade on the mobile phone, which could very well be extended to other securities. However, the platform may end up not achieving its intended purpose, given (i) the lower end of the market is largely made up of net borrowers seeking capital rather than net savers seeking to invest, (ii) the low denominations will make it very difficult for bond holders to trade, and (iii) there still exists a large need for investor education targeted towards the retail investors that this bond is targeting.
During the quarter, the money market was liquid, with a net liquidity injection of Kshs 77.0 bn. Due to this, the average interbank rate declined by 440 bps to close at 3.8%, from 8.2% at the end of 2016. The injection was as a result of (i) government payments of Kshs 314.1 bn, (ii) reverse repo purchases and repo maturities of Kshs 259.2 bn in total as the CBK participated in Open Market Operations (OMO) to boost liquidity earlier in the quarter, and (iii) T-bill redemptions of Kshs 221.3 bn. The interbank rate is often determined by the liquidity distributions within the banking sector as opposed to the net liquidity position in the interbank market.
Below is a summary of the money market activity during the quarter:
all values in Kshs bn, unless stated otherwise |
|||
Q1'2017 Liquidity Position ? Kenya |
|||
Liquidity Injection |
Liquidity Reduction |
||
Term Auction Deposit Maturities |
103.1 |
T-bond sales |
6.0 |
Government Payments |
314.1 |
Transfer from Banks ? Taxes |
235.0 |
T-bond Redemptions |
28.4 |
T-bill (Primary issues) |
197.5 |
T-bill Redemption |
221.3 |
Term Auction Deposit |
148.8 |
T-bond Interest |
27.4 |
Reverse Repo Maturities |
146.1 |
T-bill Re-discounts |
4.9 |
Repos |
121.7 |
Reverse Repo Purchases |
132.3 |
OMO Tap Sales |
26.3 |
Repos Maturities |
126.9 |
||
Total Liquidity Injection |
958.4 |
Total Liquidity Withdrawal |
881.4 |
Net Liquidity Injection |
77.0 |
The secondary bonds market recorded reduced activity during the quarter, with turnover decreasing by 34.2% to Kshs 91.1 bn in Q1?2017, from Kshs 138.4 bn recorded in Q1?2016. Turnover however improved q/q by 38.7% from Kshs 65.7 bn recorded in Q4?2016, despite the yields on government securities remaining relatively flat during the quarter. The NSE FTSE Bond index declined by 0.4% in Q1?2017 due to investors concentrating on participation in the primary market given the CBK has had one T-bond auction per month, two of which had subsequent tap sales.
According to Bloomberg, the yield on the 5-year Eurobond decreased by 70 bps to 4.0%, from 4.7% at the end of 2016, whereas that on the 10-year Eurobond decreased by 90 bps to 6.9% from 7.8% at the close of 2016. Since the mid-January 2016 peak, yields on the Kenya Eurobonds have declined by 4.8% points and 2.8% points, for the 5-year and 10-year Eurobonds, respectively, due to improving macroeconomic conditions. This is an indication that Kenya remains an attractive investment destination. Given the expected Fed rate hikes and the triggering of Article 50 of the Treaty of the European Union by the UK, we expect foreign investor sentiment to deteriorate as investors exit their investments in frontier markets, seeking safe havens like US treasuries and gold.
The Government is ahead of its domestic borrowing for the current fiscal year, having borrowed Kshs 236.8 bn against a target of Kshs 176.6 bn (assuming a pro-rated borrowing throughout the financial year of Kshs 229.6 bn budgeted for the full financial year). The government has only borrowed Kshs 205.8 bn, of the budgeted foreign borrowing, representing 44.5% of its foreign borrowing target of Kshs 462.3 bn, and given Kenya Revenue Authority (KRA) has already missed its first half of 2016/17 fiscal year revenue collection target by 3.2%, and it is expected to miss its overall revenue collection target of Kshs 1.5 tn for the current fiscal year. Given that the government only has 3 months to the close of the current fiscal year and the fact that borrowing from the foreign market is a much longer process than borrowing from the domestic market, the government is likely to use the latter to plug in the deficit that is likely to arise. This creates uncertainty in the interest rate environment as this is a move that may exert upward pressure on interest rates, and result in longer term papers not offering investors the best returns on a risk-adjusted basis. It is due to this that we think it is prudent for investors to be biased towards short-term fixed income instruments.
During the quarter, the Kenyan equities market was on a downward trend, with NASI, NSE 20 and NSE 25 losing 2.1%, 2.3% and 1.7%, respectively, as a result of decline in prices of large cap stocks. Top gainers for the quarter were KCB Group, Standard Chartered and Equity Group, which gained 20.9%, 13.8% and 10.0%, respectively. The biggest losers among the top stocks by market capitalization were Housing Finance Group, ARM, Kenya Re, BAT and Safaricom, which lost 30.4%, 21.8%, 14.7%, 6.6% and 6.0%, respectively. Since the peak in February 2015, NASI and NSE 20 are down 23.9% and 38.6%, respectively.
Equity turnover during the quarter grew by 39.6% to USD 348.5 mn compared to USD 249.7 mn in Q4?2016, and declined by 2.8% from USD 358.6 mn in Q1?2016. Foreign investors were net buyers with net inflows rising 90.1% to Kshs 17.3 mn compared to net inflows of Kshs 9.1 mn witnessed in Q4?2016.
The market is currently trading at a price to earnings ratio of 10.8x from 10.5x at the end of Q4?2016 vs a historical average of 13.5x, with a dividend yield of 6.5% compared to 6.7% at the end of Q4?2016 vs a historical average of 3.7%.
The charts below indicate the historical PE and dividend yields of the market.
During the quarter, banks and insurance companies released FY?2016 results, recording mixed performance. Bank results were weighed down by the enactment of the Banking Act (Amendment) 2015, which placed regulations on banks? loan and deposit pricing framework, while results from insurance companies were boosted by the change in the valuation methodology of long-term insurance business liabilities to the Gross Premium Valuation (GPV) methodology from the previously applied Net Premium Valuation (NPV) methodology. In addition, a number of other companies also reported depressed earnings in 2016, with the number of companies that issued profit warnings at 11 companies following 14 companies in 2015, indicating a continually challenging operating environment. This resulted into a number of job lay-offs as several banks including Equity Group, National Bank of Kenya, Standard Chartered and Sidian Bank announced job-layoffs affecting more than 840 jobs last year, as highlighted in our Cytonn Weekly #3/2017.
Kenyan listed banks have all released their FY?2016 results, recording an average growth in core earnings per share of 4.4% compared to 2.8% in FY?2015. Based on the above growth, we can bucket the listed banks into four main buckets:
FY'2016 Listed Banking Sector Metrics |
||||||||||
|
Bank |
Core EPS Growth |
Deposit Growth |
Loan Growth |
Net Interest Margin |
Loan Loss Provision Growth |
Cost to Income* |
ROaE |
ROaA |
|
1 |
SCBK |
43.9% |
7.6% |
6.6% |
10.1% |
55.1% |
44.7% |
21.3% |
3.7% |
|
2 |
DTBK |
16.6% |
22.7% |
4.9% |
7.4% |
96.0% |
37.6% |
18.3% |
2.6% |
|
3 |
I&M Holdings |
8.4% |
10.2% |
5.4% |
8.3% |
201.1% |
34.7% |
22.7% |
3.9% |
|
4 |
Cooperative Bank |
8.3% |
(2.0%) |
11.0% |
9.0% |
28.7% |
52.1% |
22.7% |
3.7% |
|
5 |
KCB Group |
(0.5%) |
5.6% |
11.5% |
8.8% |
18.9% |
52.6% |
22.2% |
3.4% |
|
6 |
NIC Bank |
(3.3%) |
(0.5%) |
(1.3%) |
8.0% |
126.9% |
38.7% |
15.5% |
2.6% |
|
7 |
Equity Group |
(4.6%) |
11.6% |
(1.4%) |
11.0% |
173.1% |
50.7% |
21.5% |
3.7% |
|
8 |
Stanbic |
(9.9%) |
1.4% |
3.4% |
5.8% |
93.1% |
57.9% |
11.3% |
2.1% |
|
9 |
Barclays Bank |
(12.6%) |
7.9% |
15.9% |
10.5% |
122.4% |
53.4% |
17.9% |
3.0% |
|
10 |
HF Group |
(24.3%) |
(8.6%) |
2.7% |
6.5% |
38.8% |
56.3% |
8.3% |
1.3% |
|
11 |
National Bank |
N/A |
(12.3%) |
(12.5%) |
8.2% |
(27.5%) |
73.9% |
1.5% |
0.1% |
|
|
FY'2016 Weighted Average |
4.4% |
6.4% |
6.3% |
9.2% |
91.3% |
49.4% |
19.9% |
3.3% |
|
Average is Market cap weighted |
||||||||||
*Without Loan Loss Charge |
Following the release of all listed banks FY?2016 results, we shall be releasing a comprehensive sector report covering Kenya?s banking sector on 10th April 2017.
IRA released FY?2016 results for the insurance industry with the market recording growth in core earnings by 10.9% to Kshs 14.6 bn from Kshs 13.1 bn in FY?2015.
Key takes from the industry performance in FY?2016 from FY?2015 include:
With both increased competition and regulation in the industry, there is need for insurance companies to come up with innovative products so as to increase insurance uptake. In addition, as highlighted in our H1?2016 Insurance Sector Report, there is need for companies to increase market awareness to grow Kenya?s low market penetration of 3.0% compared to countries such as South Africa, which is at 14.0%.
Kenyan listed insurance companies released their FY?2016 results recording an average core EPS growth of 3.4%. Sanlam and Jubilee Insurance registered growth in core EPS of 157.6% and 17.7%, respectively, while Kenya Re, Liberty and CIC recorded core EPS declines of 7.5%, 12.4% and 83.3%, respectively. Britam's EPS growth cannot be calculated since it registered a profit in FY?2016 from a loss in 2015.
FY?2016 Insurance Sector Metrics |
|||||||
|
Insurance |
Core EPS Growth |
Net Premium growth |
Claims growth |
Loss Ratio |
ROaE |
ROaA |
1 |
Sanlam |
157.9% |
0.7% |
5.2% |
86.8% |
1.8% |
4.0% |
2 |
Jubilee |
17.7% |
18.9% |
20.8% |
79.4% |
17.6% |
0.2% |
3 |
Kenya Re |
(7.5%) |
(0.7%) |
(6.0%) |
54.1% |
14.4% |
9.0% |
4 |
Liberty |
(12.4%) |
0.9% |
26.4% |
70.9% |
11.3% |
1.3% |
5 |
CIC |
(83.3%) |
(6.5%) |
(11.2%) |
63.5% |
13.5% |
10.5% |
6 |
Britam |
N/A |
6.2% |
(52.9%) |
28.8% |
14.0% |
3.1% |
|
Weighted Average |
3.4% |
6.4% |
(5.5%) |
61.6% |
13.8% |
3.9% |
|
Average is market cap weighted |
Based on the above growth, we can bucket the listed insurance companies into 3 main buckets:
Following the release of all listed insurance companies? FY?2016 results, we shall be releasing a comprehensive sector report covering Kenya?s insurance sector on 24th April 2017.
During the quarter, non-financial large cap companies released their results posting weak performance.
The relatively poor performance of the equities market for FY?2016 can be attributed to:
Below is our Equities Recommendation Table;
all prices in Kshs unless stated |
||||||||
EQUITY RECOMMENDATION |
||||||||
No. |
Company |
Price as at 30/12/16 |
Price as at 31/03/17 |
q/q Change |
Target Price* |
Dividend Yield |
Upside/ (Downside)** |
Recommendation |
1. |
ARM |
25.5 |
20.0 |
(21.8%) |
31.2 |
0.0% |
56.4% |
Buy |
2. |
HF Group |
14.0 |
9.8 |
(30.4%) |
13.8 |
9.2% |
50.7% |
Buy |
3. |
Bamburi |
160.0 |
165.0 |
3.1% |
231.7 |
7.8% |
48.2% |
Buy |
4. |
Kenya Re |
22.5 |
19.2 |
(14.7%) |
26.9 |
3.6% |
43.7% |
Buy |
5. |
Stanbic Holdings |
70.5 |
63.0 |
(10.6%) |
84.7 |
7.9% |
42.3% |
Buy |
6. |
Britam |
10.0 |
10.3 |
3.0% |
13.5 |
2.9% |
34.0% |
Buy |
7. |
KCB Group*** |
28.8 |
34.8 |
20.9% |
39.6 |
10.2% |
24.2% |
Buy |
8. |
Sanlam Kenya |
27.5 |
24.8 |
(10.0%) |
30.5 |
0.0% |
23.2% |
Buy |
9. |
Liberty |
13.2 |
11.4 |
(13.6%) |
13.9 |
0.0% |
21.9% |
Buy |
10. |
NIC |
26.0 |
26.5 |
1.9% |
30.8 |
5.1% |
21.3% |
Buy |
11. |
BAT (K) |
909.0 |
849.0 |
(6.6%) |
970.8 |
6.2% |
20.5% |
Buy |
12. |
Safaricom |
19.2 |
18.0 |
(6.0%) |
19.8 |
4.7% |
14.5% |
Accumulate |
13. |
I&M Holdings |
90.0 |
87.0 |
(3.3%) |
90.7 |
3.9% |
8.2% |
Hold |
14. |
Barclays |
8.5 |
8.0 |
(6.3%) |
7.6 |
9.7% |
5.3% |
Hold |
15. |
Co-op Bank |
13.2 |
14.0 |
5.7% |
13.6 |
5.7% |
3.2% |
Lighten |
16. |
Equity Group |
30.0 |
33.0 |
10.0% |
31.3 |
7.7% |
2.5% |
Lighten |
17. |
DTBK |
118.0 |
116.0 |
(1.7%) |
116.8 |
1.8% |
2.5% |
Lighten |
18. |
Jubilee Insurance |
490.0 |
489.0 |
(0.2%) |
482.2 |
1.8% |
0.4% |
Lighten |
19. |
SCBK |
189.0 |
215.0 |
13.8% |
157.7 |
9.2% |
(17.5%) |
Sell |
20. |
NBK |
7.2 |
6.5 |
(10.4%) |
3.8 |
0.0% |
(41.1%) |
Sell |
*Target Price as per Cytonn Analyst estimates |
||||||||
**Upside / (Downside) is adjusted for Dividend Yield |
||||||||
***For full disclosure, Cytonn and/or affiliates hold a significant stake in KCB Group, ranking as the 14th largest shareholder in the Group |
||||||||
Accumulate ? Buying should be restrained and timed to happen when there are momentary dips in stock prices. |
||||||||
Lighten ? Investor to consider selling, timed to happen when there are price rallies |
We remain "neutral with a bias to positive" for investors with short to medium-term investments horizon and are "positive" for investors with long-term investments horizon.
During the first quarter, there was heightened private equity activity, with transactions being witnessed across all major investment sectors, combined with active fundraising being undertaken by major players in the African private markets space.
Deals focused on the financial services, hospitality, energy and technology sectors, as expounded below:
The financial services sector continued to attract capital in Q1?2017, supported by the demand for financial services in the region. Some of the deals include:
Financial services sector continues to attract private equity players driven by (i) improved regulatory frameworks, (ii) growth of the middle class population with increasing numbers seeking quality financial services, and (iii) innovation in the sector with integration of mobile technology.
Deals in the hospitality sector over the first quarter of the year include:
Deals in the technology sector over the first quarter of the year include:
With an ever-growing demand for energy, both from commercial users and domestic consumers, there has been an increase in the number and value of investments into this sector, with a focus on oil. Deals in the energy sector over the first quarter of the year include:
The FMCG sector is expected to continue witnessing increased activity from both local and global players given increase in demand for quality goods by the rising middle class.
Private equity investments in Africa remains robust as evidenced by the increased deals and deal volumes in the region?s key note sectors; financial services, FMCGs, hospitality, energy and telecommunication services. Some of the global firms that have been on the spotlight include TA Associates, Amethis Finance, Total, Abraaj Group, Caryle Group and Actis. The Carlyle Group has notably been actively involved in Sub-Saharan Africa, announcing acquisitions in three different sectors during the quarter. The increasing investor interest is attributed to (i) positive demographics, such as rapid urbanization, a resilient and adapting middle class and increased consumption expenditure, (ii) the attractive valuations in private markets compared to global markets, and (iii) better economic projections in Sub Sahara Africa compared to global markets, we remain bullish on PE as an asset class in Sub-Sahara Africa. Going forward, the increasing investor interest and stable macro-economic environment will continue to boost deal flow into African markets.
The real estate sector continues to enjoy lots of positive news and according to the 2017 Wealth Report - Kenyan Chapter by Knight Frank, high-net-worth investors are investing a bulk of their money in real estate, whose share is 28%, compared to 20% invested in personal businesses and 18% invested in equities and precious metals.
However, the sector has its share of challenges, including:
Regardless of this, there are efforts to bring understanding and high quality to the construction sector and the real estate sector at large. For instance, The Board of Registration of Architects and Quality Surveyors of Kenya (BORAQS) aims at improving on the quality of buildings in Kenya and easing the approval processes for developers through a five-year strategic plan.
There were a number of other notable events in the Q1?2017, which include:
We have hence witnessed increased activity in the sector in January 2017 across most themes with the exemption of the commercial sector as covered below:
The residential theme continues to attract investments, owing to demand for housing especially in the Nairobi Metropolis. This is driven by an estimated housing deficit of over 206,000 houses per annum, in addition to the backlog of over 2 million units. Developers continue to provide housing for the mid and high end market segments even though demand is highest in the low-end market, in order to service this huge housing deficit through institutional grade real estate developments.
Asking prices for detached housing units in Nairobi Metropolis increased by 4.7% compared to apartments at 2.5%. This can be attributed to preference for privacy and own compound as opposed to apartments, which are more attractive to investors. As we near the election period, we are likely to witness lower demand and transaction volumes as investors take a wait-and-see approach.
i) Detached Houses- Top 3 High End Areas in Performance in Nairobi Metropolis |
|||||
Location |
Average Price per SM |
Average Rent per SM |
Average y/y Price Change |
Average Rental Yield |
Total Return |
Karen |
233,985 |
960 |
14% |
3% |
17% |
Kitisuru |
301,218 |
1,140 |
-11% |
6% |
-5% |
Rosslyn |
168,463 |
931 |
-2% |
7% |
5% |
Average |
234,555 |
1,010 |
1% |
5% |
6% |
Karen had the highest change in asking prices in Q1/2017 driven by demand due to its up-market state, proximity to shopping centres and serene environment away from the Central Business District. Kitisuru has the highest asking rents at Ksh 1,140 per Square Metre on average due to its proximity to diplomatic offices in Gigiri |
ii) Detached Houses- Top 3 Lower Middle Income Suburbs in Performance in Nairobi Metropolis |
|||||
Location |
Average Price per SM |
Average Rent per SM |
Average y/y Price Change |
Average Rental Yield |
Total Return |
South C |
148,475 |
577 |
15.8% |
2.0% |
17.8% |
Langata |
72,500 |
411 |
9.2% |
2.4% |
11.6% |
Buruburu |
61,141 |
259 |
7.0% |
5.1% |
12.1% |
Average |
94,039 |
415 |
10.7% |
3.2% |
13.8% |
Asking prices in South C and Lang?ata increased by 15.8% and 9.2%, respectively. This can be attributed to demand for housing by the employed middle income earners, due to proximity to Nairobi CBD and other business districts such as Upperhill. |
iii) Detached Houses- Top 3 Lower Middle Income Satellite Towns in Performance in the Nairobi Metropolis |
|||||
Location |
Average Price per SM |
Average Rent per SM |
Average y/y Price Change |
Average Rental Yield |
Total Return |
Kitengela |
74,027 |
311 |
4.9% |
5.4% |
10.3% |
Athi River |
75,755 |
264 |
3.9% |
4.2% |
8.1% |
Ruai |
51,148 |
421 |
1.3% |
4.1% |
5.4% |
Average |
66,838 |
304 |
-0.7% |
4.2% |
3.4% |
Asking prices in Kitengela and Athi River increased by 4.9% and 3.9%, respectively. This can be attributed to affordability of housing in these areas with the price of a 4-bedroom townhouse ranging from Ksh 8- Ksh 15 Mn |
iv) Apartments- Top 3 Areas in Performance in Upper Middle Income Areas in the Nairobi Metropolis |
|||||
Location |
Average Price per SM |
Average Rent per SM |
Average y/y Price Change |
Average Rental Yield |
Total Return |
Kilimani |
112,604 |
799 |
10.7% |
7.0% |
17.7% |
Westlands |
93,306 |
415 |
2.6% |
2.3% |
4.9% |
Riverside |
106,313 |
474 |
-1.8% |
5.7% |
3.9% |
Average |
102,202 |
574 |
-1.1% |
4.8% |
3.7% |
Asking prices in the Upper-Middle Income market declined by 1.1% in Q1/2017. Kilimani area had the highest price increase at 10.7% driven by its proximity to business districts such as Upperhill, Kilimani and Nairobi CBD |
v) Apartments- Top 3 Areas in Performance in Lower Middle Income Areas in Nairobi Metropolis |
|||||
Location |
Average Price per SM |
Average Rent per SM |
Average y/y Price Change |
Average Rental Yield |
Total Return |
Dagoretti |
115,076 |
685 |
8.6% |
6.9% |
15.5% |
South B & C |
107,581 |
504 |
10.0% |
4.3% |
14.4% |
Komarock |
75,508 |
420 |
10.4% |
3.7% |
14.1% |
Average |
92,398 |
461 |
5.2% |
5.0% |
10.2% |
Asking prices in the Lower Income market in Nairobi Metropolis increased by 5.2% in Q1/2017. Komarock and South B&C recorded the highest price change at 10.4% and 10.0%, respectively. South B &C are attractive to middle income earners due to proximity to Nairobi CBD and good roads, while Komarock is more affordable with the average price per square metre at Ksh 75000 |
vi) Apartments- Top 3 Areas in Performance in Lower Middle Income Areas in Nairobi Satellite Towns |
|||||
Location |
Average Price per SM |
Average Rent per SM |
Average y/y Price Change |
Average Rental Yield |
Total Return |
Athi River |
59,922 |
340 |
12.5% |
5.2% |
17.7% |
Kitengela |
60,977 |
293 |
11.4% |
4.4% |
15.8% |
Mlolongo |
64,685 |
337 |
-3.9% |
4.1% |
0.2% |
Average |
64,526 |
342 |
1.6% |
4.5% |
6.1% |
Asking prices in the Lower Income market in Nairobi's Satellite Towns increased by 1.6% in Q1/2017. Athi River and Kitengela recorded the highest price change at 12.5% and 11.4%, respectively due to affordability of housing in these areas |
We foresee the opportunity in this subsector being the lower income segment of the market. The gap is brought about by the fact that most investors in the sector provide housing for the mid and high-end market leaving the lower income segment to be catered for by the government. The biggest challenge has been high land prices and cost of construction, which is passed to the end user and financing with a mortgage to GDP rate of just 2.4% in Kenya, and only 22,000 mortgages issued in Kenya despite the capping of interest rates last year. Most home buyers are opting for other cheaper, flexible payment plans such as off-plan sales and instalment buying, and also financing solutions such purchase of real estate through SACCO?s.
The commercial office sector?s performance declined evidenced by a decline in office rents and occupancies by 1.0% and 2.0%, respectively. This is despite an increase in the number of corporations announcing plans to set up offices in Nairobi, namely Johnson and Johnson, Power China and Boeing. A summary of performance of the various commercial real estate themes is given below:
The commercial office market softened slightly in the first quarter of 2017 with average asking rents and occupancy rates declining by 2.0% from their levels in the last quarter of 2016. The prices remained largely flat increasing slightly by 2.0%, which led to a decline in rental yields by 3.0% from 9.4% in the last quarter of 2016 to 9.1%. This is mainly attributable to increased supply with the businesses moving to the newly completed office buildings such as the UAP ? Old Mutual Towers and their own office buildings.
Summary of Commercial Office Returns in Nairobi Over Time |
|||||||||
Year |
2011 |
2013 |
2015 |
2016 |
Q1 2017 |
? (2013) |
? (2015) |
? (2016) |
? Q1 (2017) |
Occupancy (%) |
91% |
90% |
89% |
88% |
86% |
(1%) |
(1%) |
(1%) |
(2%) |
Asking Rents (Kshs/Sq. ft) |
78 |
95 |
97 |
103 |
102 |
22% |
2% |
6% |
(1%) |
Average Prices (Kshs/Sq. ft) |
10,557 |
12,433 |
12,776 |
13,003 |
13,211 |
18% |
3% |
2% |
2% |
Average Rental Yields (%) |
10% |
10.% |
9% |
9% |
9% |
2% |
(7%) |
1% |
(3%) |
There was slight softening in the market in the first quarter of 2017 with occupancy and rents declining by 2.0% each from the last quarter of 2016. This is attributable to increased supply in the market with several businesses moving to the newly completed office spaces. |
In terms of submarket analysis in Nairobi, Gigiri, Karen and Westlands were the best performers in the quarter due to superior locations allowing them to charge premium rents. These locations recorded on average rental yields of 12.9%, 10.4% and 9.9%, respectively. Nairobi CBD was the worst performing submarket with rental yields of on average 8.4%. This was mainly due to poor location because of inadequate space, traffic and the general feel of the area. This resulted in several companies relocating from the CBD, such as Ecobank and Keninvest, and moving to more attractive business districts such as Westlands and Upperhill, respectively. If no action is taken to revamp the zone as a commercial office zone, it is likely to be relegated to performing largely a retail function.
Summary of Commercial Office Performance in Nairobi by Nodes |
||||
Area |
Price / SQFT ?Kshs? |
Rent / SQFT ?Kshs" |
Occupancy (%) |
Rental Yields (%) |
Gigiri |
14,000 |
130 |
70.0% |
12.9% |
Karen |
14,500 |
124 |
96.7% |
10.4% |
Westlands |
13,000 |
103 |
83.0% |
9.9% |
Parklands |
13,167 |
104 |
85.0% |
9.8% |
Kilimani |
13,800 |
105 |
87.6% |
9.3% |
UpperHill |
13,864 |
108 |
83.3% |
9.1% |
Msa Road |
11,643 |
86 |
76.7% |
8.6% |
Nairobi CBD |
11,750 |
87 |
92.7% |
8.4% |
Average |
13,194 |
101 |
86.4% |
9.1% |
Nairobi CBD was the worst performing region with average rental yields of 8.4%. This is attributable to inadequate space in the area and increased retail activity hence making it lose the exclusive high-end feel sought after in prime commercial office locations. |
In the first quarter of 2017, retail market performance remained unchanged from the last quarter of 2016. The sector recorded average rental yields of 10.2% and an average annual occupancy of 83.1%. The rents charged averaged at Kshs 190 per square foot in Nairobi. In terms of submarkets, Karen, Ngong Road and Westlands were the best performing markets due to prime locations near high-end population and companies and ease of access to these areas. These areas recorded average rental yields of 13.4%, 12.3% and 11.9%, respectively. The worst performing submarkets were Eastlands and Satellite Towns, which recorded average rental yields of 7.5% and 7.3%, respectively.
Summary of Retail Sector Performance by Nodes in Nairobi |
|||
Location |
Rent / SQFT ?Kshs? |
Occupancy (%) |
Yield (%) |
Karen |
230 |
90.0% |
13.5% |
Ngong Rd |
215 |
87.5% |
12.3% |
Westlands |
223 |
88.2% |
11.9% |
Kiambu Rd |
222 |
75.0% |
10.9% |
Kilimani |
188 |
86.7% |
10.7% |
Thika Road |
188 |
82.5% |
10.0% |
Mombasa Rd |
148 |
83.7% |
8.1% |
Eastlands |
148 |
77.0% |
7.5% |
Satellite Towns** |
143 |
77.5% |
7.3% |
Average |
190 |
83.1% |
10.2% |
Karen is the best performing submarket, with a yield of 13.5% and an occupancy of 90.0%. This is attributable to the premium for class charged on their rents and lower competition from small scale retailers present in low end areas **The Satellite towns include but not limited to Ngong, Rongai, Kitengela |
In the first quarter of 2017, the industrial theme remained largely flat recording average yields of 5.8% on average, similar to the last quarter of 2016. Rental rates averaged at Kshs 33 per square foot with selling prices of Kshs 5,904 per square foot and a high uptake of 82.6%. In submarket analysis, Baba Dogo was the best performing market with average rental yields of 7.1% and a high occupancy of 93.8%. This can be attributed to the high demand for warehousing space in the area due to presence of many manufacturing companies in the area as well as proximity to Thika Road making it easily to accessible both from the CBD and Central Kenya. Mombasa Road is the worst performing submarket with rental yields of 4.3% attributable to traffic congestions along Mombasa Road.
Summary of Industrial Market Performance in Nairobi by Nodes |
||||
Location |
Price / SQFT "Kshs" |
Rent / SQFT "Kshs" |
Occupancy % |
Rental Yields % |
Baba Dogo |
6,125 |
39 |
93.8% |
7.1% |
Industrial Area |
7,600 |
43 |
83.3% |
6.4% |
Syokimau |
5,925 |
38 |
84.0% |
6.4% |
Athi River |
3,977 |
24 |
75.6% |
5.0% |
Mombasa Road |
7,824 |
32 |
86.1% |
4.3% |
Grand Total |
5,904 |
33 |
82.6% |
5.8% |
Baba Dogo was the best performing market with average rental yields of 7.1% and a high occupancy of 94%. This can be attribute to the high demand for warehousing space in the area due to presence many manufacturing companies in the area as well as proximity to Thika Road making it easily to accessible both from the CBD and Central Kenya |
Land
In the first quarter of 2017, land has continued to attract developers and investors. The performance of the theme in the first quarter of 2017 is as outlined below:
All Values in Kshs Millions (mn) unless stated otherwise |
||||||||
Land Appreciation Rates in the Nairobi Metropolitan Area |
||||||||
Location |
2011 Price |
2015 Price |
2016 Price |
25 percentile |
75 percentile |
5-yr CAGR |
||
Nairobi Suburbs |
||||||||
Commercial Areas |
191 |
389 |
516 |
376 |
579 |
22.4% |
||
High Rise residential areas |
46 |
80 |
97 |
68 |
118 |
17.7% |
||
Low Rise Residential areas |
65 |
114 |
133 |
85 |
172 |
16.5% |
||
Satellite Towns |
||||||||
Serviced Land |
6 |
13 |
15 |
10 |
19 |
24.5% |
||
Unserviced Land |
9 |
14 |
17 |
12 |
22 |
17.6% |
||
Market Average |
63 |
122 |
156 |
110 |
182 |
19.7% |
||
Serviced land in Satellite towns have the highest appreciation rates as they rose from a low base and the servicing increases their attractiveness to the buyers. Land in commercial areas have also witnessed rapid appreciation as a result of limited supply and increased demand |
A number of activities on the transactions and legal fronts affected the land sector as outlined below:
The Kenyan hospitality sector continues to witness increased investment by both local and global players. Tourism in the country is recovering from a five-year dip evidenced by a (5%) growth of Total RevPAR between 2011 & 2016. These findings are documented in the Cytonn Hospitality Report 2016 released in October 2016. This has attracted investors specifically in Q1?2017, including the following:
We expect that there will be continued spending in hotels this year due to:
During the quarter, Fahari I REIT?s share price declined 5.6% to close at Kshs 11.0 per unit, which is a 45% decline from Kshs 20 at the time of the listing. The prices for the instrument have remained low largely due to (i) opacity of the exact returns from the underlying assets, (ii) inadequate investor knowledge and lack of institutional support for REITS, and (iii) the negative sentiment currently engulfing the sector given the poor performance of Fahari and that the Fusion REIT, dubbed Fusion Real Estate Development (FRED).
Also in the month, Stanlib Fahari i-REIT released its earnings. The entity recorded a net profit of Kshs 109 mn and announced a dividend pay-out of 92.6% translating to Kshs 0.5 per unit and hence a dividend yield of 4.7%. While this is a move in the right direction as it ensures they comply with the requisite regulations, the returns are not attractive enough to spur investment in the instrument as direct investment in real estate delivered higher returns, with retail buildings like the underlying assets for the REIT offering yields of 10.1% p.a. We hence expect the REIT to continue trading at low prices and in low volumes. See Cytonn Weekly #12/2017
We expect the real estate sector?s performance to remain stable in the year with prices remaining at the current levels as investors adopt a wait-and-see approach.
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this publication, are those of the writers where particulars are not warranted. This publication, which is in compliance with Section 2 of the Capital Markets Authority Act Cap 485A, is meant for general information only, and is not a warranty, representation, advice or solicitation of any nature. Readers are advised in all circumstances to seek the advice of a registered investment advisor.