Mar 11, 2018
In 2017, we released our Nairobi Commercial Office Report - 2017, which covered the performance of the office sector in Nairobi in 2016. According to the report, the commercial office sector was transitioning to a buyers’ market due to an oversupply of space that stood at 2.9 mn SQFT in 2016, expected to reach 3.2 mn SQFT in 2017. Rental yields had stagnated at 2015 levels of 9.3%, and occupancy rates reduced by 1.0% points to come in at 88.0% in 2016 from 89.0% in 2015. However, we noted that the commercial office theme had pockets of value in differentiated concepts such as Mixed-Use Developments (MUDs), serviced offices and also in Kenyan Counties due to devolution. This week, we update that report with our Nairobi Commercial Office Report - 2018. The report highlights the performance of the office sector in 2017, based on rental yields, prices, occupancy rates, demand and supply, all in comparison to 2016 and the years before to identify the trends, and hence outlook for the sector, and we give a recommendation for investment. In this focus note, we will highlight the key take-outs from the report, starting with a brief introduction to the commercial office sector in Nairobi, performance summary over time, by nodes and by grades, and conclude by highlighting the outlook and thus opportunity in the sector.
Introduction
Supported by robust GDP growth of more than 5.0% p.a, growth in professional services, financial services as well as the growth of Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs), the commercial office sector boomed between 2011 and 2015. The sector recorded high returns with average rental yields of 10.0% and occupancy levels of on average 90.0% as at 2011. Attracted by the high demand for office space from the bodies above and the high returns, developers increased the supply of office space in the market with the stock of office space increasing from 6.7mn SQFT in 2011 to 22.9 mn SQFT in 2015, a 4 year CAGR of 27.9%. In 2016, largely as a result of the increase in supply the market’s performance started softening with occupancy rates declining by 1.0% points y/y, and rental yields stagnating at 2015 levels of 9.3%. In 2017, the commercial office performance softened further, with occupancy rates declining by 4.8% points from an average of 88.0% in 2016 to an average of 83.2%, the largest annual decline over the last five years. The rental yields also softened, reducing by 0.1% points from an average of 9.3% in 2016 to an average of 9.2% in 2017. The decline in performance is largely attributed to;
The reduced demand thus led to a decline in occupancy rates and consequently an increase in oversupply as showed below;
Summary of Nairobi Commercial Office Demand and Supply Trends Over Time |
||||||||||||
Year |
2011 |
2013 |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018F |
3 Year CAGR (2013-2016) |
y/y ∆ 2016 |
y/y ∆ 2017 |
|||
Office Stock (SQFT) |
6.7mn |
9.7mn |
22.9mn |
28.9mn |
31.8mn |
35.5mn |
31.4% |
26.2% |
10.0% |
|||
Completions (SQFT) |
2.1 mn |
7.8 mn |
6.5mn |
3.5mn |
4.3mn |
32.6% |
(16.7%) |
(46.2%) |
||||
Vacancy Rates (%) |
11.0% |
10.0% |
11.0% |
12.0% |
16.8% |
16.8% |
|
1.0% |
4.8% points |
|||
*Demand (SQFT) |
1.9mn |
6.8mn |
5.6mn |
1.6mn |
3.7mn |
31.0% |
(17.6%) |
(71.4%) |
||||
** Supply ( SQFT) |
2.6mn |
8.8mn |
8.4mn |
6.3mn |
9.0mn |
34.1% |
(4.5%) |
(25.0%) |
||||
***Oversupply (SQFT) |
|
0.8mn |
2.1mn |
2.9mn |
4.7mn |
5.3mn |
38.0% |
38.1% |
62.1% |
|||
*Demand – It is computed by summing space absorbed during the year and depreciated office stock. Space absorbed is computed by subtracting occupied stock the previous year from occupied stock the current year. We assume depreciation at a rate of 2% on all available commercial office stock **Supply – It is computed by summing the vacant stock the previous period to the size of completed stock the current period **Oversupply – Computed by subtracting the supply from the demand, if supply exceeds demand, then the market has an oversupply |
Source: Cytonn Research, Building Plan Approvals Data from the Nairobi City County
Market Performance
In our analysis of commercial office market performance in 2017, we will look at the performance i) over time, ii) based on nodes/ submarkets, iii) based on Classes/ Grades, and iv) a combination of Grades and Nodes
In 2017, the commercial office sector’s performance in Nairobi softened slightly with asking rental yields declining by 0.1% points to average at 9.2%, from 9.3% in 2016. Occupancy rates recorded the highest decline year on year over the last five-years, declining by 4.8% points to average at 83.2% from 88.0% in 2016. This is as a result of an increase in supply leading to an oversupply of 4.7 mn SQFT. Rents and prices remained stable mainly as higher quality office space came to the market attracting higher rents, and as office leases are normally long term (6 years) and subject to escalations, therefore relatively inelastic in the short run.
The table below summarizes the performance of the commercial office theme over time:
Nairobi Commercial Office Performance Summary Over Time |
|||||||
Year |
2011 |
2013 |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
y/y ∆ 2016 |
y/y ∆ 2017 |
Occupancy (%) |
91.0% |
90.0% |
89.0% |
88.0% |
83.2% |
(1.0%) |
(4.8% points) |
Asking Rents (Kshs/SQFT) |
78 |
95 |
97 |
97 |
99 |
0.0% |
1.8% |
Average Prices (Kshs/SQFT) |
10,557 |
12,433 |
12,776 |
12,031 |
12,595 |
(5.8%) |
4.7% |
Average Rental Yields (%) |
9.8% |
10.0% |
9.3% |
9.3% |
9.2% |
0.0% |
(0.1% points) |
|
Source: Cytonn Research
For submarket analysis, we classified the main office nodes in Nairobi into 8 nodes: i) Nairobi CBD, covering the Central Business District, ii) Westlands, covering environs including Riverside, iii) Parklands, iv) Mombasa Road, v) Thika Road, vi) Upperhill, vii) Karen, and viii) Kilimani, covering space in Kilimani, Kileleshwa and Lavington. As was the case in 2015 and 2016, Parklands and Karen had the highest returns with average rental yields of 9.7% and 9.5%, respectively. This is attributed to their prime locations and high-quality office spaces enabling them to charge prime rents. Nairobi CBD, Thika Road, and Mombasa Road had the lowest returns with average rental yields of 8.7% for the CBD, and 8.5% for both Mombasa Road and Thika Road. The poor performance is attributed to two main reasons:
Commercial Office Performance in 2017 by Nodes |
||||||||||
Area |
Price (Kshs/ SQFT) |
Rent 2017 (Kshs/SQFT) |
Occupancy 2017(%) |
Yield 2017(%) |
Price 2016 (Kshs/SQFT) |
Rent 2016 (Kshs/SQFT) |
Occupancy 2016(%) |
Yield 2016 (%) |
% Change in Rents Y/Y |
|
Parklands |
12,729 |
103 |
85.7% |
9.7% |
11,771 |
102 |
80.0% |
10.0% |
1.3% |
|
Karen |
13,167 |
113 |
89.2% |
9.5% |
13,500 |
107 |
90.0% |
10.1% |
5.8% |
|
Kilimani |
12,901 |
101 |
84.5% |
9.5% |
12,667 |
99 |
90.5% |
9.5% |
2.2% |
|
Westlands |
12,872 |
103 |
88.5% |
9.4% |
12,482 |
102 |
92.1% |
9.3% |
1.1% |
|
UpperHill |
12,995 |
99 |
82.0% |
9.0% |
12,529 |
102 |
89.8% |
9.0% |
(3.0%) |
|
Nairobi CBD |
12,286 |
88 |
84.1% |
8.7% |
11,750 |
92 |
92.7% |
9.3% |
(4.2%) |
|
Thika Road |
11,500 |
82 |
73.6% |
8.5% |
11,700 |
91 |
80.3% |
8.3% |
(10.3%) |
|
Mombasa Road |
11,641 |
82 |
74.2% |
8.5% |
10,720 |
80 |
86.1% |
8.3% |
2.1% |
|
Average |
12,679 |
99 |
83.9% |
9.23% |
12,053 |
100 |
88.9% |
9.2% |
(0.6%) |
|
|
We also analyzed performance in terms of class and nodes where we classified commercial office buildings into three main categories based on size and quality of office spaces. These are:
Under this category, Grade A outperformed other classes recording yields of 9.8% as the offices are in prime business districts with superior amenities and are thus able to charge prime rents, which are on average Kshs 112 per SQFT per month, against a market average of Kshs 99 per SQFT per month. Despite the high returns, the increase in supply in the market constrained the performance of Grade A offices, leading to a 0.2% points decline in yields from the 10.0% recorded in 2016. Grade B offices are the most popular with the highest average occupancy of 85.1%. This is as they are of a better quality than Grade C offices and are more affordable than Grade A offices, with Grade B rents being 11.4% cheaper per SQFT compared to Grade A offices. They therefore bucked the downward trend of returns recording a 0.1%-point increase in yields from 9.3% in 2016 to 9.2% in 2017. Grade C offices had the lowest returns with average rental yields of 8.4% mainly due to low quality of office space and thus attract rents that are lower than market averages. Similar to Grade A offices, the performance of Grade C offices softened in 2017 as a result of an increase in supply and the economic slowdown. The yields declined by 0.2% points from 8.6% in 2016 to 8.4% in 2017. The performance according to grades / class is as summarized in the table below;
Commercial Office Performance in Nairobi 2017 by Grades |
||||||||||||
Typology |
Price Kshs/ SQFT |
Rent 2017 (Kshs/SQFT) |
Occupancy 2017(%) |
Yield 2017(%) |
Price 2016 (Kshs/SQFT) |
Rents 2016 (Kshs/SQFT) |
Occupancy 2016 (%) |
Rental Yields 2016(%) |
y/y Change in yields |
|||
Grade A |
13,053 |
112 |
81.5% |
9.8% |
12,889 |
112 |
85.7% |
10.0% |
(0.2%) |
|||
Grade B |
12,804 |
99 |
85.1% |
9.3% |
11,959 |
98 |
90.6% |
9.2% |
0.1% |
|||
Grade C |
11,929 |
84 |
83.1% |
8.4% |
11,245 |
82 |
87.5% |
8.6% |
(0.2%) |
|||
Average |
12,595 |
99 |
83.2% |
9.2% |
12,031 |
97 |
88.0% |
9.3% |
(0.1%) |
|||
|
Combining the analysis of performance by nodes and by class shows that for Grade A offices the opportunity is in Kilimani with high yields of on average 9.9%. For Grade B, the opportunity is in Parklands with average rental yield of 9.9%. For Grade C, the opportunity in lies in Kilimani with rental yields of on average 9.1% and 98.3% occupancy levels
Commercial Office Performance by Nodes and Grades in Nairobi 2017 |
||||||
Grade A |
Grade B |
Grade C |
||||
Area |
Yield |
Occupancy |
Yield |
Occupancy |
Yield |
Occupancy |
Karen |
9.4% |
92.9% |
9.7% |
86.7% |
||
Kilimani |
9.9% |
69.6% |
9.4% |
86.4% |
9.1% |
98.3% |
Msa Road |
10.1% |
84.9% |
9.7% |
79.8% |
7.3% |
67.6% |
Parklands |
9.7% |
59.8% |
9.9% |
87.8% |
8.9% |
90.0% |
UpperHill |
9.4% |
74.9% |
9.1% |
83.5% |
8.2% |
92.5% |
Westlands |
9.7% |
90.7% |
9.4% |
89.5% |
9.1% |
85.0% |
Thika Road |
9.1% |
65.3% |
8.0% |
81.8% |
||
Nairobi CBD |
|
|
8.7% |
83.7% |
8.3% |
86.1% |
|
Source: Cytonn Research
Commercial Office Performance in Select Sub Saharan African Cities
We also compared the performance of the commercial office market in Nairobi with selected cities in Sub Saharan African markets that we cover. These are; Accra- Ghana, Kampala- Uganda, Dar Es Salaam- Tanzania, and Kigali- Rwanda. Nairobi outperforms Dar Es Salaam generating an average rental yield of 8.5% to the dollar, against an average of 6.4% in Dar Es Salaam. Kampala - Uganda has the highest yields for commercial offices at 10.6%, followed by Accra and Kigali with average rental yields of 10.1%, and 9.8%, respectively.
Source: Cytonn Research
Office Market Conclusion and Outlook
Nairobi Commercial Office Outlook |
||||
Measure |
2016 Sentiment |
2017 Sentiment |
2017 Outlook |
2018 Outlook |
Supply |
|
|
Negative
|
Negative |
Demand |
|
|
Negative |
Positive |
Office Market Performance |
|
|
Neutral |
Negative |
General Outlook and Opportunity |
|
For the 2017 commercial office outlook, we had two out of the three metrics as negative and one neutral and thus a negative outlook for the commercial office market in Nairobi. For 2018, two of the metrics under consideration are negative and one positive and thus we retain our negative outlook for the commercial office market in Nairobi. Investments in the sector should, therefore, be biased toward the long-term, for gains when the market picks up in 3-5 years. The pockets of value in the sector are in zones with low supply and high returns such as Karen and in differentiated concepts such a serviced offices and green buildings.
--------------------------
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this publication, are those of the writers where particulars are not warranted- as the facts may change from time to time. This publication is meant for general information only, and is not a warranty, representation or solicitation for any product that may be on offer. Readers are thereby advised in all circumstances, to seek the advice of an independent financial advisor to advise them of the suitability of any financial product for their investment purposes.