Nov 21, 2021
In December 2020, we released the Nairobi Metropolitan Area Mixed-Use Developments (MUDs) Report-2020, which highlighted that Mixed-Use Developments (MUDs) recorded an average rental yield of 6.9%, 0.1% points higher than the respective single use Retail, Commercial Office and Residential themes with 6.8% in 2020. The relatively better performance by MUDs compared to single-use developments was attributed to the prime locations mostly serving the high and growing middle income class, coupled with the concept’s convenience that incorporates working, shopping and living spaces.
This week we update our report with the 2021 market research that was conducted in 7 nodes within the Nairobi Metropolitan Area (NMA), in order to determine the market performance of MUDs against the market performance of the Residential, Commercial Office and Retail sectors. Therefore, this topical will cover the following:
Section I: Overview of Mixed-Use Developments
As a recap, a Mixed-Use Development (MUD) refers to an urban development that incorporates more than one Real Estate theme. This therefore means that a single development project will serve more than one purpose, that is, residential, commercial, retail, and, hospitality purposes, all at the same location. Due to the integration, MUDs offer benefits such as easier access to amenities and services, residential and working spaces all in one location.
Some of the factors that have been driving the growth of MUDs include;
Despite the aforementioned supporting factors, Mixed- Use Developments face various challenges such as:
Section II: Mixed-Use Developments Performance Summary in 2021
Mixed-Use Developments recorded an average rental yield of 7.2% in 2021, 0.7% points higher than the respective single use themes which recorded average rental yield of 6.5% in the similar period. The relatively better performance was mainly attributed to; i) an improved business environment, ii) strategic and prime locations of the developments with the capability to attract prospective clients, and, iii) preference by target clients due to their convenience hence improved demand and returns to investors. The retail and commercial office theme in the MUDs recorded a 1.3% and 0.2% points increase in the average rental yield to 8.4% and 7.1%, respectively in 2021, from 7.1% and 6.9% in 2020. This was mainly due to an improved business environment leading to increased demand and uptake of spaces. For the Residential theme in the MUDs, the average rental yield declined by 0.3% points to 6.0% in 2021, from 6.3% in 2020, attributed to other landlords still offering discounts in a bid to attract more tenants as well as retaining the existing ones. Additionally, the Retail, Commercial Office and Residential themes in the MUDs performed better in 2021 when compared to single Retail, Commercial Office and Residential themes which realized rental yields of 7.8%, 6.6%% and 5.2%, respectively in 2021. This was attributed to their incorporated live, work and play lifestyle thus more preferred, coupled with the adequate amenities available leading to their increased demand.
The table below shows the performance of single-use and mixed-use development themes between 2020 and 2021;
Thematic Performance of MUDs in Key Nodes 2020-2021 |
||||||
|
MUD Themes Average |
Market Performance Average |
||||
|
Rental Yield 2021 |
Rental Yield 2020 |
∆ in y/y MUD Rental yield |
Rental Yield 2021 |
Rental Yield 2020 |
∆ in y/y Market Average Rental Yield |
Retail |
8.4% |
7.1% |
1.3% |
7.8% |
7.7% |
0.1% |
Offices |
7.1% |
6.9% |
0.2% |
6.6% |
6.8% |
(0.2%) |
Residential |
6.0% |
6.3% |
(0.3%) |
5.2% |
5.8% |
(0.6%) |
Average |
7.2% |
6.9% |
0.3% |
6.5% |
6.8% |
(0.3%) |
* Market performance is calculated from nodes where sampled MUDs exist |
Source: Cytonn Research 2021
Karen was the best performing node with an average MUD rental yield of 8.7%, 1.5% points higher than the market average of 7.2% in 2021. In terms of respective performance of the MUD themes in Karen; Retail and Office themes recorded average rental yields of 8.8%, and 9.0%, respectively, 0.4%, and 1.9% points higher than the market average of 8.4%, and 7.1%, respectively. The remarkable performance was largely attributed to; i) the prime developments fetching higher rates, and, ii) the adequate amenities and infrastructure servicing the area.
Eastlands was the worst performing node with the average MUD rental yield coming in at 5.1%, 2.1% points lower than the market average of 7.2%. The respective themes i.e. Retail, commercial office and Residential sectors recorded average rental yield of 5.5%, 5.0% and 4.2%, respectively, 2.9%, 2.1% and 0.8% points lower than the market average of 8.4%, 7.1% and 6.0%, respectively. The poor performance was mainly attributed to low quality developments fetching lower rents thus affecting the overall yields, as well as inadequate amenities and infrastructure servicing the area.
The table below shows the performance of Mixed-Use Developments by node in 2021;
(All Values in Kshs Unless Stated Otherwise)
Nairobi’s Mixed-Use Developments Market Performance by Nodes 2021 |
|||||||||||||
|
Retail Performance |
Commercial Office Performance |
Residential Performance |
|
|||||||||
Location |
Price/SQFT |
Rent/SQFT |
Occup. (%) |
Rental Yield (%) |
Price/ SQFT |
Rent/SQFT |
Occup. %) |
Rental Yield (%) |
Price/ SQM |
Rent/ SQM |
Annual Uptake % |
Rental Yield % |
Average MUD yield |
Karen |
23,333 |
196 |
86.7% |
8.8% |
13,233 |
117 |
85.0% |
9.0% |
|
|
|
|
8.7% |
Westlands |
15,833 |
173 |
70.8% |
9.5% |
12,892 |
110 |
71.7% |
7.3% |
211,525 |
1,226 |
15.6% |
7.0% |
7.8% |
Kilimani |
18,500 |
162 |
79.0% |
8.3% |
13,713 |
106 |
79.0% |
6.7% |
|
|
|
|
7.4% |
Mombasa Rd |
20,000 |
185 |
70.0% |
8.4% |
13,000 |
100 |
60.0% |
5.5% |
156,079 |
853 |
13.3% |
6.6% |
7.4% |
Thika Rd |
23,750 |
215 |
82.5% |
9.2% |
13,250 |
105 |
72.5% |
6.9% |
128,545 |
612 |
17.9% |
6.1% |
7.0% |
Upper Hill |
15,485 |
130 |
62.5% |
6.4% |
12,000 |
102 |
70.0% |
7.0% |
|
|
|
|
6.8% |
Eastlands |
20,000 |
124 |
75.0% |
5.5% |
12,000 |
80 |
62.5% |
5.0% |
72,072 |
360 |
10.0% |
4.2% |
5.1% |
Average |
18,759 |
170 |
75.9% |
8.4% |
12,924 |
106 |
73.6% |
7.1% |
142,055 |
763 |
15.0% |
6.0% |
7.2% |
*The average MUDs performance is based on areas where sampled projects exist |
Source: Cytonn Research 2021
In our Mixed-Use Development analysis, we looked into the performance of the retail, commercial office and residential themes:
The average rental yield of retail spaces in Mixed-Use Developments came in at 8.4% in 2021, 0.6% points higher than single use retail developments that realized an average rental yield of 7.8%. This was mainly attributed to the higher rental rates that MUDs generated at Kshs 170 per SQFT when compared to Kshs 168 per SQFT recorded for the single-use retail spaces. Moreover, the remarkable performance for the MUDs was attributed to their higher preference and demand resulting from their convenience as one-stop centers for consumers living and working in the area.
Westlands was the best performing node with the average rental yield at 9.5%, 1.1% points higher than the market average of 8.4%. This was mainly driven by; i) the presence of high and middle income earning residents with greater purchasing power, ii) relatively higher rental rates and prices fetching higher returns, and iii) adequate amenities and infrastructure servicing the developments. Contrary to this, Eastlands was the worst performing node with an average rental yield of 5.5%, 2.9% points lower than the market average of 8.4%, as a result of the higher competition of informal retail spaces, and the low supply of quality spaces which in turn generated lower rental rates.
The table below provides a summary of the performance of retail spaces in MUDs against market performance in 2021;
Performance of Retail in MUDs versus Market Performance 2021 |
|||||||
|
MUD Performance |
Market Performance |
|
||||
Location |
Rent/SQFT |
Occupancy (%) |
Rental Yield (%) |
Rent/SQFT |
Occupancy (%) |
Rental Yield (%) |
Rental Yield Difference |
Westlands |
173 |
70.8% |
9.5% |
209 |
80.4% |
9.7% |
(0.2%) |
Thika Rd |
215 |
82.5% |
9.2% |
158 |
74.2% |
6.7% |
2.5% |
Karen |
196 |
86.7% |
8.8% |
214 |
80.8% |
9.4% |
(0.5%) |
Mombasa Rd |
185 |
70.0% |
8.4% |
136 |
70.5% |
6.0% |
2.4% |
Kilimani |
162 |
79.0% |
8.3% |
172 |
83.6% |
9.0% |
(0.7%) |
Upper Hill |
130 |
62.5% |
6.4% |
|
|
|
|
Eastlands |
124 |
75.0% |
5.5% |
135 |
72.5% |
5.9% |
(0.4%) |
Average |
170 |
75.9% |
8.4% |
168 |
77.0% |
7.8% |
0.6% |
*Market performance is calculated from nodes where sampled MUDs exist |
Cytonn Research 2021
The average rental yield for commercial office spaces in MUDs came in at 7.1%, 0.5% points higher than the market performance which realized an average rental yield of 6.6% in 2021. The performance by MUDs was largely attributed to; i) the presence of quality spaces generating higher rental rates at Kshs 105 per SQFT compared to the market’s average of Kshs 91 per SQFT, and, ii) higher prices at Kshs 12,924 per SQFT against market’s average of Kshs 12,306 per SQFT generating higher returns. In light of this, Karen was the best performing node with an average rental yield of 9.0% against the market average of 7.1% due to; i) the presence of high-end developments such as the Galleria business park and the Hub that offer higher rental rates and returns, ii) adequate infrastructure and amenities servicing the area, and, iii) prime location targeting clients who are willing to pay premiums for the spaces. Eastlands was the worst performing node with an average rental yield of 5.0% as a result of the availability of low quality office spaces generating lower rents at Kshs 80 per SQFT against the market average of Kshs 105 per SQFT.
The table below shows the performance of office spaces in MUDs against the single use themed market in 2021;
All Values in Kshs Unless Stated Otherwise
Performance of Commercial Offices in MUDs versus Market Performance 2021 |
|||||||||
|
MUD Performance |
Market Performance |
|
||||||
Location |
Price/SQFT |
Rent/SQFT |
Occupancy (%) |
Rental Yield (%) |
Price/SQFT |
Rent/SQFT |
Occupancy (%) |
Rental Yield (%) |
Rental Yield Difference |
Karen |
13,233 |
117 |
85.0% |
9.0% |
13,325 |
104 |
84.8% |
7.5% |
1.5% |
Westlands |
12,892 |
110 |
71.7% |
7.3% |
12,038 |
104 |
75.6% |
7.9% |
(0.6%) |
Upper Hill |
12,000 |
102 |
70.0% |
7.0% |
12,432 |
93 |
77.1% |
6.7% |
0.3% |
Thika Rd |
13,250 |
105 |
72.5% |
6.9% |
12,500 |
79 |
76.7% |
5.6% |
1.3% |
Kilimani |
13,713 |
106 |
79.0% |
6.7% |
12,293 |
92 |
79.8% |
7.1% |
(0.4%) |
Mombasa Rd |
13,000 |
100 |
60.0% |
5.5% |
11,250 |
71 |
61.3% |
4.7% |
0.8% |
Eastlands |
12,000 |
80 |
62.5% |
5.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
12,924 |
105 |
73.6% |
7.1% |
12,306 |
91 |
75.9% |
6.6% |
0.5% |
*Market performance is calculated from nodes where sampled MUDs exist |
Cytonn Research 2021
Residential units within MUDs recorded an average rental yield of 6.0% in 2021, 0.8% points higher than the single-use residential market rental yield of 5.2%. The better performance was largely driven by; i) availability of adequate amenities and infrastructure, and ii) relatively higher prices and rents at Kshs 142,055 per SQFT and Kshs 763 per SQFT, respectively, compared to the Kshs 88,013 and Kshs 459 per SQFT realized for the single use residential theme, respectively. Westlands was the best performing node with an average rental yield of 7.0% due to the presence of affluent developments fetching high rents and prices, and the adequate infrastructure servicing the area such as Redhill and Mwanzi roads. However, Eastlands was the worst performing node with an average rental yield of 4.2% resulting from; i) lower rental prices and rates, ii) inadequate infrastructure to service the developments, and iii) availability of low quality units fetching lower rates that affect returns as well.
The table below summarizes the performance of residential spaces in MUDs against the single themed market in 2021;
All Values in Kshs Unless Stated Otherwise
Performance of Residential Units in MUDs versus Market Performance 2021 |
|||||||||
|
MUD performance |
Market performance |
|
||||||
Location |
Price/SQM |
Rent/SQM |
Uptake % |
Rental Yield % |
Price/SQM |
Rent/SQM |
Uptake % |
Rental Yield % |
Rental Yield Difference |
Westlands |
211,525 |
1,226 |
15.6% |
7.0% |
145951 |
833 |
27.9% |
4.6% |
2.4% |
Mombasa Rd |
156,079 |
853 |
13.3% |
6.6% |
81,578 |
428 |
12.6% |
5.5% |
1.1% |
Thika Rd |
128,545 |
612 |
17.9% |
6.1% |
83153 |
413 |
15.5% |
4.8% |
1.3% |
Eastlands |
72,072 |
360 |
10.0% |
4.2% |
71,971 |
327 |
13.8% |
5.1% |
(0.9%) |
Average |
142,055 |
763 |
15% |
6.0% |
88,013 |
459 |
15.1% |
5.2% |
0.8% |
Westlands and Limuru Road recorded the highest prices and rents attributed to the affluent developments with adequate amenities and infrastructure thus fetching higher rates *The average residential performance is based on areas where sampled MUDs exist |
Cytonn Research 2021
Section III: Mixed-Use Developments Investment Opportunity and Outlook
The table below summarizes our outlook on Mixed-Use Developments (MUDs), where we look at the general performance of the key sectors that compose MUDs i.e. retail, commercial office and residential and investment opportunities that lies in the themes;
|
Mixed-Use Developments (MUDs) Outlook |
|
|
Sector |
2021 Sentiment and Outlook |
2021 Outlook |
|
Retail |
|
Neutral |
|
Office |
|
Neutral |
|
Residential |
|
Neutral |
|
Outlook |
We are NEUTRAL of the Mixed-Use Developments (MUDs) outlook supported by the impressive returns recorded at 7.2% in 2021, from 6.9% in 2020. However, their performance is expected to be weighed down by existing oversupply at 7.3 mn SQFT in the NMA office market, and oversupply in the retail market at 3.0 mn SQFT in the NMA and 1.7 mn SQFT in Kenya retail market. The investment opportunity lies in areas with relatively high returns such as Karen and Westlands which recorded an average MUD rental yield of 8.7%, and, 7.8% respectively, against the market average of 7.2%. |
Source: Cytonn Research 2021
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this publication are those of the writers where particulars are not warranted. This publication, which is in compliance with Section 2 of the Capital Markets Authority Act Cap 485A, is meant for general information only and is not a warranty, representation, advice or solicitation of any nature. Readers are advised in all circumstances to seek the advice of a registered investment advisor.