Cytonn Group Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Edwin Dande has responded to reports making rounds on social media based on a letter authored by the Capital Markets Authority (CMA).
Mr Dande said that the reports are quoting the letter without the requisite context.
He acknowledged that Cytonn had received the letter in question from CMA. The regulator was asking the investment company to limit investments by Cytonn High Yield Fund, CHYF, into real estate managed by Cytonn to no more than 10% of the fund.
The directive was purportedly based on regulation 16 (2) of the Collective Investment Schemes Regulation.
“Regulation 16 (2) is only applicable to a Fund where the Fund Manager, the Custodian and the Trustee are related, with the view that given the relatedness in the governance of the Fund, it’s prudent to limit investments into in-house projects to 10%,” noted Mr Dande.
“However, in the case of CHYF, the Trustee is National Bank, the Fund Manager is Cytonn Asset Managers Limited and the Custodian, SBM Bank Kenya are not related companies, hence it was our contention that regulation 16 (2) could not apply to CHYF, not to mention that the constitutive documents are clear that the fund can only invest in real estate managed by Cytonn,” he further said.
The Cytonn boss also acknowledged that they held discussions with CMA to try and get them to retract their letter but the discussions did not yield much.
“Consequently, we filed a petition for judicial interpretation of the issue and both Cytonn and CMA appeared Inter Parties before the High Court on September 21, whereupon the high court issued stay orders against the CMA letter,” Mr Dande said.
“Subsequent to the stay order issued on September 21, CMA then authored a letter dated September 21, put it into a replying affidavit dated September 22nd, delivered it to our offices on September 23rd and shared the affidavit with the public,” the Cytonn CEO clarified, “However, in the affidavit, they raised issues with another fund, the privately offered Cytonn High Yield Solutions, CHYS, which is a different fund, not regulated by CMA and has nothing to do with the matter in court.
“The decision is binding to all CHYS Pre-COVID investors. Out of 4,000 investors, about 13 of them were unhappy and approached CMA, and that is the letter that is making rounds in the news.,” Mr Dande said in a communication to media houses.
Staff Writer - 1 year ago
Kevin Namunwa - 2 months ago
Kevin Namunwa - 13 hours ago
Digital Team - 1 week ago