By Research Team, Jan 26, 2020
During the week, T-bills remained oversubscribed, with the subscription rate coming in at 145.9%, up from 118.1% recorded the previous week, and higher than the YTD average of 111.2%. The oversubscription is attributable to improved liquidity in the market during the week supported mainly by government payments, which partly offset tax remittances. The Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) is set to meet on Monday, 27th January 2020, to review the prevailing macro-economic conditions and decide on the direction of the Central Bank Rate (CBR). We expect MPC to maintain the CBR at 8.5%, having lowered the CBR from 9.0% to 8.5% in their last meeting on 25th November, 2019. During the week, the Treasury released the Draft 2020 Budget Policy Statement, which highlights the current performance of the country’s economy and gives a medium-term outlook, in preparation for the 2020/21 Budget for comments from the general public;
During the week, the equities market was on a downward trend, with NASI, NSE 20, and NSE 25 recording declines of (0.8%), (1.0%), and (0.7%), respectively, taking their YTD performance to (0.9%), (0.4%), and (0.6%), for the NASI, NSE 20, and NSE 25, respectively. Jubilee Holdings announced plans to lay off 52 employees as the firm completes splitting of its insurance business in Kenya to increase efficiency and management focus and also comply with the revised 2010 Insurance Act, cap 487, which requires all composite companies to have separate entities, by separating short-term underwriting business from the long-term underwriting business. The Capital Markets Authority released the Q4'2019 Statistical Bulletin, highlighting the performance of the Equities market during the quarter under review;
During the week, the Kenyan Government’s affordable housing agenda received a major boost as United Kingdom based investor, United Kingdom Climate Investment (UKCI) pledged to invest GBP 30 mn (Kshs 3.9 bn) towards development of 10,000 green affordable homes in Kenya. In the retail sector, Amethis Finance, a Paris-based private equity fund, acquired a 30.0% stake in Naivas Limited for an undisclosed amount, while in the hospitality sector, PrideInn, a local hotel group, announced its first management facility, the five-star Azure Hotel located in Westlands;
In 2017 we reviewed the real estate industry and prepared two topical reports, Is There a Real Estate Bubble in Kenya? and What Real Estate Bubble?, addressing speculations that the property market was experiencing a bubble. Overall, we concluded that the Kenyan real estate market was still in its nascent stage and was just being institutionalized. This week, we revisit the topic by reviewing the current state of the market, and comparing it to two property markets that have previously experienced a property bubble, namely Poland and Japan, and finalize by giving our view on the same.
Money Markets, T-Bills & T-Bonds Primary Auction:
During the week, T-bills remained oversubscribed, with the subscription rate coming in at 145.9%, up from 118.1% recorded the previous week, and higher than the YTD average of 111.2%. The oversubscription is attributable to improved liquidity in the market during the week, supported mainly by government payments, which partly offset tax remittances. We note that the 364-day paper continued to receive the most interest from investors, having recorded the highest subscription rate of the 3 papers, at 217.1%. This is attributable to the market currently pricing that the government will be under pressure to meet its domestic borrowing target, and as such a bias to shorter-dated papers in order to avoid duration risk, which has seen most investors still keen on the primary fixed income market, finding the 364-day T-bill more attractive on a risk-adjusted return basis, compared to a two year bond with a yield of 10.4%. The yields on the 91-day, 182-day and 364-day papers increased by 4.7 bps, 4.5 bps and 1.7 bps to 7.3%, 8.2%, and 9.9%, respectively. The acceptance rate declined to 77.0%, from 80.1% recorded the previous week, with the government accepting Kshs 26.9 bn of the Kshs 35.0 bn worth of bids received.
During the month of January, the government reopened two bonds, FXD1/2019/5 and FXD1/2019/10, in a bid to raise Kshs 50.0 bn for budgetary support. The FXD1/2019/5 and FXD1/2019/10 had an effective tenor of 4.1-years and 9.1-years, and coupon rates of 11.3% and 12.4%, respectively, with the overall subscription rate coming in at 139.9%. Further to this, we note that there was pent up demand on the FXD1/2019/5, which received bids worth Kshs 44.5 bn of the Kshs 69.9 bn worth of bids received for both bonds, in line with our expectations that investors will be attracted to the shorter-term paper due to its relatively shorter tenor, thus, reduced duration risk, coupled with the high liquidity in the market. The yields came in at 11.5% and 12.5% for the 5-year and 10-year bonds, respectively, with the government accepting Kshs 63.7 bn out of the Kshs 69.9 bn worth of bids received, translating to an acceptance rate of 91.1%. We note that this was higher than the quantum of Kshs 50.0 bn for the issue, emphasizing the government’s aggressiveness in accepting money in an effort to meet its domestic borrowing target.
In the money markets, 3-month bank placements ended the week at 8.4% (based on what we have been offered by various banks), the 91-day T-bill came in at 7.3%, while the average of Top 5 Money Market Funds came in at 10.1%, unchanged from the previous week. The yield on the Cytonn Money Market increased marginally by 0.1% points to close at 11.2%, from the 11.1% recorded the previous week.
Liquidity:
During the week, the average interbank rate increased marginally to 3.9%, from 3.8% recorded the previous week. The average interbank rate is way below the 2019 average of 4.3%, an indication of the improved liquidity position in the money markets, supported by government payments and debt maturities, with commercial banks’ excess reserves coming in at Kshs 28.2 bn in relation to the 5.25% cash reserves requirement (CRR). The average interbank volumes increased by 17.6% to Kshs 13.2 bn, from Kshs 11.2 bn recorded the previous week.
Kenya Eurobonds:
According to Reuters, the yield on the 10-year Eurobond issued in June 2014 increased marginally by 0.1% points to 4.7%, from 4.6% recorded the previous week.
During the week, the yields on the 10-year Eurobond increased marginally to 5.9%, from 5.8% seen the previous week, while that of the 30-year Eurobond remained unchanged at 7.5%.
During the week, the yield on the 7-year Eurobond increased by 0.1% points to 5.7%, from 5.6% recorded the previous week. The yield on the 12-year Eurobond also increased by 0.1% points to 6.8%, from 6.7% recorded the previous week.
Kenya Shilling:
During the week, the Kenya Shilling appreciated marginally by 0.1% against the US Dollar to close at Kshs 100.9, from 101.0 recorded the previous week, mostly supported by dollar inflows from horticulture exports and offshore investors buying government debt. On an YTD basis, the shilling has appreciated by 0.4% against the dollar, in comparison to the 0.5% appreciation in 2019. In our view, the shilling should remain relatively stable against the dollar in the short term, with a bias to a 2.4% depreciation by the end of 2020, supported by:
We, however, expect pressure on the Kenyan shilling to arise from:
Monetary Policy:
The Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) is set to meet on Monday, 27th January 2020, to review the prevailing macro-economic conditions and decide on the direction of the Central Bank Rate (CBR). In their previous meeting held on 25th November 2019, the MPC lowered the CBR by 50 bps to 8.5% from 9.0%, citing that the economy was operating below its potential level concluding that there was room for accommodative monetary policy to support economic activity. This was in line with our expectations as per our MPC Note, with our view being informed by:
The Monetary Policy Committee also noted that the current account deficit had narrowed to 4.1% of GDP in the 12-months to September 2019 compared to 5.1% in September 2018, supported by strong growth in diaspora remittances. The decline was also partly attributable to higher receipts from the tourism and transport services as well as lower food and SGR-related equipment imports.
We expect the MPC to hold the CBR at 8.5%, with their decision being supported by:
Based on this, we believe the MPC will hold the rates steady as they continue monitoring the market reactions of the previous cut.
For our detailed MPC analysis, please see our MPC Note for the 27th January 2020 meeting here.
Weekly Highlight:
During the week, the Treasury released the Draft 2020 Budget Policy Statement, which highlights the current performance of the country’s economy and gives a medium-term outlook, in preparation for the FY2020/21 Budget for comments from the general public. The Budget Policy Statement (BPS) is a government policy document that sets out the strategic priorities, policy targets as well as a summary of the government’s spending plans in preparation for the FY 2020/21 Budget. It is prepared by the National Treasury and submitted to the Cabinet for approval. Upon approval, the BPS is submitted for deliberations in Parliament where a resolution will be passed to adopt it, with or without amendments. The Cabinet Secretary will then take into account the resolutions passed by parliament in finalizing the budget for that Fiscal Year.
Below is a comparison of the FY’2019/20 budget and the projected FY’2020/21 budget as per the Draft 2020 BPS;
(All values in billions)
A Comparison of the FY’2019/20 Budget with the Projected FY’2020/21 Budget |
||||
FY'2018/2019 Budget Outturn |
FY'2019/2020 Supplementary 2019 |
FY'2020/2021 BPS |
% Change 2019/20 to 2020/21 |
|
Total Revenue |
1,698.8 |
2,084.2 |
2,133.5 |
2.4% |
External Grants |
19.7 |
41.8 |
43.1 |
3.0% |
Total Revenue & External Grants |
1,718.5 |
2,126.1 |
2,176.5 |
2.4% |
Recurrent Expenditure |
1,531.1 |
1,760.0 |
1,786.9 |
1.5% |
Development Expenditure & Net Lending |
541.9 |
730.8 |
576.0 |
(21.2%) |
County Governments + Contingencies |
360.7 |
383.4 |
381.0 |
(0.6%) |
Total Expenditure |
2,433.7 |
2,874.2 |
2,743.8 |
(4.5%) |
Fiscal Deficit Excluding Grants |
(734.9) |
(789.9) |
(610.3) |
(22.7%) |
Fiscal Deficit Including Grants |
(715.2) |
(748.1) |
(567.3) |
(24.2%) |
Deficit as % of GDP; |
|
|
|
|
Excluding Grants |
7.9% |
7.6% |
5.2% |
|
Including Grants |
7.7% |
7.2% |
4.9% |
|
Net Foreign Borrowing |
414.5 |
353.5 |
247.3 |
(30.0%) |
Net Domestic Borrowing |
303.7 |
300.7 |
318.9 |
6.0% |
Other Domestic Financing |
2.9 |
3.2 |
3.2 |
|
Total Borrowing |
721.1 |
657.4 |
569.4 |
(13.4%) |
GDP Estimate |
9,348.3 |
10,355.4 |
11,633.4 |
12.3% |
Source: The National Treasury
Key take-outs from the table include:
In conclusion, the government has taken a keen focus on fiscal consolidation where we can see the significant reduction in the expenditure towards development, and the more realistic revenue targets that they have set. This will allow them to get a clear picture of the current fiscal framework, which will ultimately help make policies more effective. Similarly, the proposed debt restructuring will contribute significantly to reducing the fiscal deficit through the restructuring of expensive commercial loans to cheaper multi and bilateral loans. We, however, remain concerned about the country’s debt levels and are pessimistic about their ability to meet its revenue collection targets due to the levels of domestic debt maturities in FY’2019/20, currently at Kshs 493.0 bn, coupled with the historical underperformance of ordinary revenues, with the government having met 93.1% of its target as per the FY’2018/2019 budget outturn. There is more to be done in terms of revenue collection such as:
Inflation Projections:
We are projecting the Y/Y inflation rate for the month of January to come in within the range of 5.7% - 6.1%, compared to 5.8% recorded in December. The Y/Y inflation for the month of January is expected to rise due to the base effect. The M/M inflation is also expected to rise driven by:
Going forward, we expect the inflation rate to remain within the government set range of 2.5% - 7.5%.
Rates in the fixed income market have remained relatively stable as the government rejects expensive bids. The government is 33.2% ahead of its domestic borrowing target, having borrowed Kshs 238.5 bn against a pro-rated target of Kshs 179.0 bn. We expect an improvement in private sector credit growth considering the repeal of the interest rate cap. This will result in increased competition for bank funds from both the private and public sectors, resulting in upward pressure on interest rates. Owing to this, our view is that investors should be biased towards short-term fixed-income securities to reduce duration risk.
Market Performance
During the week, the equities market was on a downward trend with NASI, NSE 20, and NSE 25 recording declines of (0.8%), (1.0%), and (0.7%), respectively, taking their YTD performance to (0.9%), (0.4%) and (0.6%), for the NASI, NSE 20, and NSE 25, respectively. The performance in NASI was driven by losses recorded by large-cap stocks such as Bamburi, Barclays and Co-operative bank of (8.4%), (3.0%) and (2.5%), respectively.
Equities turnover decreased by 29.9% during the week to USD 28.2 mn, from USD 40.2 mn recorded the previous week, taking the YTD turnover to USD 97.1 mn. Foreign investors remained net buyers for the week, with a net buying position of USD 1.6 mn, a 75.0% decrease from a net buying position of USD 6.6 mn recorded the previous week.
The market is currently trading at a price to earnings ratio (P/E) of 11.3x, 15.0% below the historical average of 13.3x, and a dividend yield of 5.7%, 1.8% points above the historical average of 3.9%. With the market trading at valuations below the historical average, we believe there is value in the market. The current P/E valuation of 11.3x is 16.6% above the most recent trough valuation of 9.7x experienced in the first week of February 2017, and 36.3% above the previous trough valuation of 8.3x experienced in December 2011. The charts below indicate the historical P/E and dividend yields of the market.
Weekly Highlight
During the week, Jubilee Holdings announced plans to lay off 52 employees as it completes splitting of its insurance business in Kenya to increase efficiency and management focus and to comply with the revised 2010 Insurance Act, cap 487, which requires all composite companies to have separate entities, by separating short-term underwriting business from the long-term underwriting business. The separation has led to the creation of two new companies, Jubilee Health Insurance offering medical covers and Jubilee General Insurance offering general insurance covers. In H1’2019 Jubilee’s net profits dropped marginally by 1.6% to Kshs 1.8 bn, from Kshs 1.9bn in H1’2018, attributable to a tough operating environment, which affected the top-line revenue, coupled with rising inefficiencies, consequently leading to declines in net income. Similarly in 2019, Sanlam Kenya PLC also undertook restructuring as part of a cost-cutting strategy aimed at trimming operating costs, as the company aimed to record a profitable performance following the depletion of earnings in 2018 to record a Kshs 2.0 bn loss. Over the last few years, companies have continued to face economic challenges that has seen them restructure their staffing, with others declaring redundancies, and others opting for outright closure. The table below shows some of the listed companies that have announced or undertook restructuring in the last one year. In our view, restructuring continues to be a major theme shaping various sectors’ business models into 2020, with companies adopting cost-saving measures to boost bottom-line performance, attributable to a tough business environment;
Kenya Listed Companies Restructuring |
||
Company |
Staff Retrenchment |
Date |
Jubilee Holdings |
52 |
Jan-20 |
East Africa Portland Cement |
800* |
Aug-19 |
Stanbic Bank of Kenya |
88 |
Aug-19 |
East Africa Breweries Limited |
100 |
Jul-19 |
Sanlam Kenya |
19 |
Sep-19 |
Mumias Sugar** |
All staff |
Nov-19 |
*EAPC declared all its staff redundant and required them to reapply under new terms **Mumias sugar was placed in receivership on 20th September 2019 |
During the week, the Capital Markets Authority released the Q4'2019 Statistical Bulletin, highlighting the performance of the Equities market during the quarter under review;
We maintain our view that to improve the performance of the equities market, the following should be addressed;
Universe of Coverage
Banks |
Price at 17/01/2020 |
Price at 24/01/2020 |
w/w change |
YTD Change |
Year Open |
Target Price* |
Dividend Yield |
Upside/ Downside** |
P/TBv Multiple |
Recommendation |
Kenya Reinsurance |
3.0 |
3.0 |
0.0% |
(1.0%) |
3.0 |
4.8 |
15.0% |
75.0% |
0.3x |
Buy |
Diamond Trust Bank |
117.0 |
116.8 |
(0.2%) |
7.1% |
109.0 |
189.0 |
2.2% |
64.1% |
0.6x |
Buy |
I&M Holdings*** |
58.3 |
57.5 |
(1.3%) |
6.5% |
54.0 |
75.2 |
6.8% |
37.6% |
1.0x |
Buy |
KCB Group*** |
51.8 |
51.8 |
0.0% |
(4.2%) |
54.0 |
64.2 |
6.8% |
30.8% |
1.4x |
Buy |
Jubilee Holdings |
360.0 |
360.0 |
0.0% |
2.6% |
351.0 |
453.4 |
2.5% |
28.4% |
1.2x |
Buy |
Sanlam |
17.5 |
17.3 |
(1.1%) |
0.6% |
17.2 |
21.7 |
0.0% |
25.4% |
0.7x |
Buy |
Co-op Bank*** |
16.0 |
15.6 |
(2.5%) |
(4.6%) |
16.4 |
18.1 |
6.4% |
22.4% |
1.3x |
Buy |
Equity Group*** |
51.3 |
51.5 |
0.5% |
(3.7%) |
53.5 |
56.7 |
3.9% |
14.0% |
1.9x |
Accumulate |
Standard Chartered |
204.5 |
205.0 |
0.2% |
1.2% |
202.5 |
211.6 |
9.3% |
12.5% |
1.5x |
Accumulate |
Barclays Bank*** |
13.5 |
13.1 |
(3.0%) |
(1.9%) |
13.4 |
13.0 |
8.4% |
7.6% |
1.7x |
Hold |
Stanbic Holdings |
112.8 |
100.8 |
(10.6%) |
(7.8%) |
109.3 |
103.1 |
4.8% |
7.1% |
1.1x |
Hold |
NCBA |
36.3 |
36.5 |
0.7% |
(0.9%) |
36.9 |
37.0 |
4.1% |
5.5% |
0.8x |
Hold |
Liberty Holdings |
10.4 |
10.4 |
(0.5%) |
0.0% |
10.4 |
10.1 |
4.8% |
2.1% |
0.9x |
Lighten |
CIC Group |
2.9 |
2.9 |
1.4% |
9.0% |
2.7 |
2.6 |
4.5% |
(5.2%) |
1.0x |
Sell |
HF Group |
6.1 |
5.7 |
(6.9%) |
(11.8%) |
6.5 |
4.2 |
0.0% |
(26.3%) |
0.2x |
Sell |
Britam |
9.2 |
9.2 |
0.4% |
2.7% |
9.0 |
6.8 |
0.0% |
(26.9%) |
0.9x |
Sell |
*Target Price as per Cytonn Analyst estimates **Upside/ (Downside) is adjusted for Dividend Yield ***Banks in which Cytonn and/ or its affiliates are invested in |
We are “Positive” on equities for investors as the sustained price declines have seen the market P/E decline to below its historical average. We expect increased market activity, and possibly increased inflows from foreign investors, as they take advantage of the attractive valuations, to support the positive performance.
During the week, United Kingdom Climate Investment (UKCI), a joint venture between the Green Investment Group, a UK-based specialist developer and investor of green infrastructure, and the United Kingdom Government’s Department for Business, pledged to invest GBP 30 mn (Kshs 3.9 bn) towards affordable green housing in Kenya, a major boost for the Kenyan Government’s affordable housing agenda. The pledge will be delivered through a locally managed vehicle that also seeks to raise between Kshs 8.0 bn and Kshs 25.0 bn, from Kenyan and international institutional investors, to be geared towards alleviating the affordable housing shortage, currently estimated at 2.0 mn units, while embedding green design standards and stimulating institutional investment in sustainable buildings locally. With the affordable housing initiative’s estimated total cost of Kshs 1.3 tn, the investment will provide a significant impetus to the programme, which aims to deliver 500,000 units by 2022. The government has thus far allocated a total of Kshs 16.5 bn from the 2018/19 and 2019/2020 budgets and a further Kshs 28.0 bn from the Supplementary Appropriation Bills of 2018 and 2019. Previously, the government also received similar support in 2018, from the United Nations Project Services (UNoPs), in which the UN subsidiary committed to deliver 100,000 low cost green homes across Kenya at an estimated cost of Kshs 64.7 bn. As such, we expect continued interest in Kenya’s investment scene particularly affordable housing owing to; (i) government’s investor-friendly incentives and regulations, (ii) a stable macroeconomic environment, and (iii) positive demographics characterised by an expanding middle class and rapid population growth, which have continued to sustain the demand for housing.
During the week, leading local retailer Naivas Limited signed a deal to sell 30.0% of its business to Paris-based private equity fund, Amethis Finance, for an undisclosed amount. The PE firm, which has presence across Africa in cities such as Accra, Abidjan, and Casablanca aims to grant entrepreneurs access to external growth opportunities, while improving their efficiency and governance, and therefore, we expect that the move will boost the local retailer’s expansion strategy that has seen it open 57 branches across the country, while also help it avoid corporate governance and management issues that have plagued retail giants such as Nakumatt, Choppies, and Uchumi. In our view, the move affirms the continued investor confidence by international players in Kenya’s retail sector signalling its positive outlook, which is largely driven by; (i) Kenya’s attractive economic projections as compared to global markets, with Kenya among the countries expected to spearhead growth in the Sub Saharan Africa (SSA) region with an expected GDP growth of 5.7%, as per the Cytonn Markets Outlook 2020, in comparison to SSA’s projections of 2.9%, (ii) strong domestic demand driven by the growing middle class population and rapid population growth, which has led to international retailers such as Mango and Skechers setting up shop in the region to satiate demand for quality international products, and (iii) a general improvement in ease of doing business in the region evidenced by Kenya’s move from position #61 in 2018 to #56 in 2019 on the Ease of Doing Business Index by World Bank .
For investors in retail real estate, the entry of foreign players boosts retail space performance and stabilizes uptake and thus, enhancing investor returns. As of 2019, the retail sector recorded average yield of 7.8% in comparison to the office and residential sectors with 7.5% and 5.0%, respectively, with markets such as Westlands and Karen offering relatively high returns of up to 10.3%.
Nairobi Retail Sector Performance by Nodes 2019 |
|||
Location |
Rent Kshs/SQFT FY' 2019 |
Occupancy FY’ 2019 |
Rental Yield FY' 2019 |
Westlands |
215 |
82.8% |
10.3% |
Karen |
222 |
80.0% |
9.5% |
Kilimani |
167 |
87.4% |
8.8% |
Ngong Road |
181 |
80.5% |
8.3% |
Kiambu Road |
180 |
67.6% |
7.2% |
Thika road |
173 |
72.8% |
7.1% |
Eastlands |
150 |
71.7% |
6.8% |
Mombasa road |
156 |
66.8% |
6.3% |
Satellite Towns |
136 |
73.3% |
5.9% |
Average |
176 |
75.9% |
7.8% |
· As of 2019, the retail sector posted average yield of 7.8%, with nodes such as Westlands, Karen, Kilimani and Ngong Road registering average yields of 10.3%, 9.5%, 8.8% and 8.3%, respectively |
Source: Cytonn Research
PrideInn, a local hospitality group, revealed plans of undertaking its first management facility, Azure Hotel, a Kshs 1.2 bn five-star hotel with 164-rooms located in Westlands. Currently, PrideInn operates various own-facilities in Westlands, Nairobi and others in Mombasa. Overall, this plays testament to Westland’s attractiveness as a hospitality node, attributable to; (i) proximity to business nodes such as Kilimani, Central Business District (CBD), and Upperhill, enabled by relatively good road connectivity, (ii) availability of amenities such as the Westgate Mall, Sarit Centre, and other recreational amenities that help to attract visitors, and (iii) convenient accessibility to the main airports, that is, Jomo Kenyatta International Airport (JKIA) and Wilson Airport – and this is bound to improve further with the planned JKIA-James Gichuru Express Highway. The move also affirms Nairobi’s vibrant hospitality sector that is driven by; (i) Nairobi’s status as a key financial hub in Africa, which attracts business and Meeting, Incentives, Conferences and Exhibitions (MICE) travellers, (ii) relatively good infrastructure, and (iii) the government’s open sky policy that has enhanced the ease of movement for Africans, thereby attracting tourists and investors. According to Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (KNBS), international visitors reported in 2018 increased by 14.0% to 2.0 mn from 1.8 mn in 2017, and this is expected to increase in 2020. The graph below shows the growth of the number of in tourism earnings and tourist arrivals;
Source: Kenya National Bureau of Statistic
We expect the sector to remain vibrant in 2020 and based on the KNBS historical data, we expect that international arrivals will grow by 4.9% on average to 2.1 mn and 2.2 mn for 2019 and 2020, respectively, boosted by:
Overall, we expect the real estate sector to continue improving with pockets of value in themes such as affordable housing, hospitality sector and select retail markets, boosted by; (i) rapid urbanization, growing middle class and thus, increased consumerism, (ii) Kenya’s attractive economic projections compared to global markets, with Kenya among the countries expected to spearhead growth in the Sub Saharan Africa (SSA) region with GDP growth expected to come in at 5.7% in comparison to SSA’s projections of 2.9%, and (iii) government’s investor-friendly incentives and regulations for real estate investors.
In 2017 we reviewed the real estate industry and prepared two topical pieces, Is There a Real Estate Bubble in Kenya? and What Real Estate Bubble?, addressing speculations that the property market was experiencing a bubble. According to the two topical reports, the Kenyan real estate market was still in its nascent stage and was just being institutionalized. The Kenyan market was thus, not experiencing a bubble but the normal real estate cycles of rising demand, peaking market, falling market then bottoming out. The rapid price increments witnessed were attributed to the real estate market being in the rising phase that was characterized by low supply and high demand leading to an increase in prices. This week, we revisit the topic by reviewing the current state of the market.
It is evident that the property market in Nairobi has been burgeoning, with buildings stretching far and beyond. In the recent years, the Nairobi Metropolitan Area has recorded increased development activities, and the same is evident throughout the country. According to Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (KNBS), the real estate sector grew by 4.8% on average from Q1’2019 to Q3’2019, 0.3% points higher than the growth rate recorded over the same period in 2018. In terms of performance, the sector continues to record relatively high returns with the 5-year average coming in at 20.1% p.a., compared to traditional assets at 8.7% p.a. This has been boosted by;
Despite the above, real estate firms have been reporting decline in residential units’ occupancy rates especially in the high-end market segment, while the commercial office and retail sector have continued to record an oversupply estimated at 5.6 mn and 2.8 mn SQFT, respectively. This has resulted in speculation that Kenya’s property market is having a bubble or headed there. With the aim of addressing the same, this week, we shall look into;
A real estate bubble is defined as a run-up in property prices fueled by demand, speculation, and exuberant spending, bringing the sector to the point of collapse. It usually starts with an increase in demand for property, in the face of limited supply, which takes a relatively extended period to replenish and increase. Speculators bring in money into the market, further driving up demand. At some point, the demand decreases or stagnates at the same time supply increases, resulting in a sharp drop in prices, and the bubble bursts. A housing bubble has been witnessed in mature, first world economies such as Japan, Poland, United States of America, Australia and China.
A real estate bubble is characterized by;
Having looked at what a real estate bubble is and its characteristics, we now shift our focus to case studies of Poland and Japan, which experienced property bubbles that eventually burst in 2008 and 1991, respectively. The two markets were mainly characterized by availability and affordability of credit, which resulted in a relatively high demand for property outstripping the supply.
The property market in Poland experienced a housing boom following Poland’s ascension to the European Union in December 2002. Polish banks relaxed their financial regulations by making credit more readily available leading to historically low rates on the mortgage loans. The property boom was mainly driven by:
As a result, residential prices rose rapidly with the average residential prices increasing by a 2-year CAGR of 13.1% between 2006 and 2008. According to REAS JLL, a real estate management services firm, residential prices in the Polish capital, Warsaw, rose by 23.0% in 2005, 28.0% in 2006, 45.0% in 2007, and 13.0% in 2008.
The residential market bubble was pricked during the global recession of 2008 as the country’s GDP growth rate declined by 1.5% while the residential market prices dropped by 13.8% between 2008 and 2013. This was attributed to a decline in the value of the local currency, the Zloty (PLN), which resulted in relatively high mortgage service costs, thus, borrowers were not able to service their mortgages.
The Japanese asset price bubble lasted approximately 6-years from 1986 to 1991 during which real estate prices were greatly inflated with land recording an annual appreciation of approximately 42.0%, driven by speculation. In early 1992, this price bubble burst and Japan's economy stagnated and property prices deflated through to 2001 and the 10-year period was known as "Japan's Lost Decade". The bubble mainly impacted the Tokyo Metropolis and was characterized by; (i) rapid acceleration of real estate prices, resulting from overheated property transactions with the demand outstripping the supply, (ii) relatively low interest rates which encouraged uptake of mortgages and hence increased the demand for housing units in the market, and (iii) speculation regarding property prices.
The main causes of the bubble were;
The ultra-low interest rates and relatively high money supply in the market, fueled a housing bubble in Japan by driving demand for property which eventually outstripped the supply, and resulted in a significant rise in prices of property with land and residential properties recording an annual appreciation of approximately 42.0% and 10.0%, respectively. It eventually became too expensive for the general population to afford property, which resulted in lower demand hence, property prices declining tremendously. For instance, land values corrected throughout the 1990s, by approximately 70% by 2001, and the property bubble was said to have burst.
In the two case studies, real estate prices increase in response to the heightened demand and investment leading to a boom period which creates a period of irrational excitement with people demanding and taking credit to purchase houses.
For the Kenyan market, we believe this is not the case, and this is supported by;
Additionally, In Poland, the interest rates averaged at approximately 5.8%, which was a 2.3% points decline from 8.1% in 2006, leading to increased mortgage loan uptake with speculators paying as much as 10% - 20% as deposits and taking up entire phases of off-plan developments. On the other hand, in the Kenyan market, interest rates on loans have remained relatively high, over the last couple of years averaging at approximately 13.5%, with the interest rate cap, and are expected to go even higher following the repeal of the cap in 2019. It is thus high enough to prevent excessive borrowing from financial institutions or individuals to fund speculative purchase of property that may result into unsustainable demand,
Currently there exists an oversupply of space in the commercial office and retail sectors estimated at 5.6 mn SQFT and 2.0 mn SQFT, respectively. We attribute the surplus to relatively low uptake of space as compared to the existing supply. However, the market has continued to witness increased entry and expansion of multinationals, local and international retailers, such as French Retailer Carrefour and South African Shoprite, who have continued to take up available retail space. In addition, the market has witnessed a slow-down in incoming supply with no new developments expected to come into the retail market in 2020 and thus, we expect the market to absorb the surplus supply in the short- term. For the residential market, in Kenya, there is a need for over 200,000 houses annually according to the National Housing Cooperative (NHC) with Nairobi experiencing deficit of about 120,000. Approximately 35,000 houses are constructed each year in Nairobi meaning there is an unmet demand of 85,000 houses annually in Nairobi and its metropolis. The demand clearly outweighs the supply indicating that there is no bubble in the market and no burst is likely to be experienced, at least in the medium to long term. The sector’s resilience will thus, be backed by fundamentals that determine the demand for real estate products. There could be oversupply in some markets, especially in the upper middle income areas. Investors should conduct proper market research to identify the pockets of value.
In conclusion, real estate prices increase in response to the increased demand and investment leading to a boom period, which creates a period of irrational excitement with people demanding and taking credit to purchase houses. That said, we do not foresee a real estate bubble occurring in Kenya, as the market is still constrained by issues such as unavailability of credit and relatively high interest rates, tight credit underwriting standards, inaccessibility of mortgage financing and thus, there lacks the possibility of unsustainable demand that will supersede the current supply across all the sectors.
Currently, the sector is just experiencing the normal real estate cycles, and the rapid price increments and declines being witnessed are a result of low supply and high demand, and vice versa in select sectors. Therefore, the real estate market still has pockets of value:
Below is a summary of the specific themes and nodes:
The Key Areas of Opportunities by Theme in Real Estate Sector |
|||
Sector |
Themes |
Locations |
Reasons |
Residential Sector |
High-End (Detached) |
Runda, Karen |
Annual returns at 6.4% and 5.5%, respectively, against the high-end market average of 5.0% For speculative buyers, Karen and Kitisuru recorded the highest annual uptake in this segment with 21.0% and 21.8%, respectively, against the high-end market average of 19.9% |
Upper Mid-End (Detached) |
Runda Mumwe, Ridgeways/Garden Estate |
Relatively high uptake at 22.7% and 25.0%, respectively. The areas also have relatively low supply coupled by availability of development land in comparison to other upper mid-end areas such as Lavington and Lang’ata |
|
Upper Mid-End (Apartments) |
Parklands, Kileleshwa |
Relatively high annual returns of 7.5% and 7.1%, respectively, against upper mid-end market average of 6.1% |
|
Low-End (Detached) |
Athi River, Kitengela |
Relatively high returns averaging 7.1% and 7.0%, respectively, in comparison to the respective market average of 6.6% |
|
Low-End (Apartments) |
Thindigua, Ruaka, Athi River |
Relatively high annual returns and uptake of up to 8.2% and 21.0%, respectively |
|
Commercial Office Sector |
Grade A Offices |
Gigiri, Karen |
Relatively low supply, proximity to commercial hubs and high yields of 9.2% and 8.3%, respectively |
Serviced Offices |
Westlands |
Prime commercial hubs with high occupancy of 85.5% and yields of 15.8% |
|
Retail Sector |
Suburban Malls |
Counties such as Mt. Kenya Regions and Kiambu |
Mt. Kenya Regions and Kiambu with attractive yields at 8.6% and 8.0% and occupancy rates at 82.3% and 79.4%, respectively |
Mixed Use Developments (MUDs) |
MUD |
Kilimani, Limuru Road |
Affluent neighborhoods with high rental yield return of 9.1% and 8.0%, respectively |
Hospitality Sector |
Serviced Apartments |
Westlands & Parklands, Kilimani |
Relatively high rental yields of above 10.8% and 9.5%, respectively, compared to the market average of 7.6% |
Land Sector |
Satellite Towns |
Utawala and Limuru |
Relatively high capital appreciation of above 10.0% y/y, the provision of trunk infrastructure such as road networks and the growing demand for development land |
Suburbs |
Karen, Runda, Kitisuru and Kilimani |
Relatively high capital appreciation of above 10.0% y/y and proximity to amenities |
Source: Cytonn Research
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this publication are those of the writers where particulars are not warranted. This publication is meant for general information only and is not a warranty, representation, advice or solicitation of any nature. Readers are advised in all circumstances to seek the advice of a registered investment advisor.