By Cytonn Research Team, May 30, 2021
During the week, T-bills remained oversubscribed, but the overall subscription rate dropped to 152.4%, from 162.0% recorded the previous week. The demand for the 364-day paper persisted, as it recorded the highest bids worth Kshs 23.8 bn against the offered Kshs 10.0 bn, translating to a subscription rate of 238.2%, a decrease from the 241.3% recorded the previous week. Investors’ continued interest in the 364-day paper is mainly attributable to the paper’s attractive return of 9.2%, which is higher than the rate for most bank placements. The yields on all the three papers declined; with the 91-day, 182-day and 364-day paper declining by 1.6 bps, 8.8 bps and 12.8 bps, to 7.1%, 7.9% and 9.2%, respectively.
During the week, the National Treasury gazetted the revenue and net expenditures for the first ten months of FY’2021/2021, highlighting that Total revenue collected as at the end of April 2021 amounted to Kshs 2.2 tn, equivalent to 74.1% of the revised FY’2020/2021 target of Kshs 2.9 tn. The total expenditure amounted to Kshs 2.2 tn in the 10 months leading to the end of April 2021, equivalent to 73.6% of the revised FY’2020/2021 budget of Kshs 2.9 tn and 88.3% of the 10-months prorated expenditure estimates.
We are projecting the y/y inflation rate for May 2021 to remain stable within the range of 5.6% - 5.9%, compared to 5.8% recorded in April 2021.
The National Treasury and Planning announced that it had presented the Finance Bill 2021 to Parliament and one of the key note is that the overall budget for FY’2021/2022 total expenditure is projected to increase Kshs 3.6 tn from Kshs 2.9 tn in the financial year 2020/2021 as the government tries to balance between stimulating economic recovery and responding to the health challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic.
During the week, the equities market was on an upward trajectory, with NSE 20, NASI and NSE 25 gaining by 0.2%, 4.2% and 3.5% respectively. This week’s performance took their YTD performance to gains of 13.6% and 8.9%, for NASI and NSE 25, respectively, and a loss of 0.5% for NSE 20. The equities market performance was driven by gains recorded by stocks such as EABL, Safaricom and ABSA which gained by 7.0%, 5.9% and 4.6%, respectively. The gains were however weighed down by losses recorded by stocks such as Bamburi, Diamond Trust Bank (DTB-K) and BAT which lost by 7.2%, 5.9 and 1.3%, respectively. During the week, Safaricom Plc announced that the Ethiopian Communications Authority (ECA) had approved a bid for an Ethiopia Telco License which was submitted by a consortium including Safaricom, Vodacom Group Ltd, Vodafone Group Plc (UK), CDC Group Plc and Sumitomo Corporation. During the week, KCB Group, I&M Holdings, Equity Group, NCBA Group, Diamond Trust Bank Kenya (DTB-K), Standard Chartered Bank Kenya, and HF Group released their Q1’2021 financial results;
During the week, the Central Bank of Kenya (CBK), released the Bank Supervision Annual Report 2020, highlighting that the residential mortgage market recorded a 3.7% decline in the number of mortgage loans accounts in the market, to 26,971 in December 2020 from 27,993 in December 2019. In the hospitality sector, Kenya Airports Authority announced that JKIA passenger movement registered a 24.1% decline in the month of March 2021, to 279,413 passengers from 368,279 passengers in the same period last year;
Following the release of FY’2020 results by insurance companies, this week we analyze the performance of the 5 listed insurance companies in the country, identify the key factors that influenced their performance, and give our outlook for the insurance sector going forward;
Investment Updates:
Real Estate Updates:
For recent news about the group, see our news section here.
Money Markets, T-Bills & T-Bonds Primary Auction:
During the week, T-bills remained oversubscribed, but the overall subscription rate dropped; coming in at 152.4%, from 162.0% recorded the previous week. The demand for the 364-day paper persisted, as it recorded the highest bids worth Kshs 23.8 bn against the offered Kshs 10.0 bn, translating to a subscription rate of 238.2%, a decrease from the 241.3% recorded the previous week. Investors’ continued interest in the 364-day paper is mainly attributable to the paper’s attractive return of 9.2% which is higher than the rate being offered by most bank. The subscription rate for the 182-day paper increased to 103.1%, from 101.1% recorded the previous week, receiving bids worth Kshs 10.3 bn against the Kshs 10.0 bn offered. The subscription rate for the 91-day paper declined to 61.2%, from 116.1% recorded the previous week, with the paper receiving bids worth Kshs 2.4 bn against the offered amounts of Kshs 4.0 bn. The yields on all the three papers declined; with the 91-day, 182-day and 364-day paper declining by 1.6 bps, 8.8 bps and 12.8 bps, to 7.1%, 7.9% and 9.2%, respectively. The government continued to reject expensive bids, accepting Kshs 20.6 bn out of the Kshs 36.6 bn worth of bids received, translating to an acceptance rate of 56.3%.
In the money markets, 3-month bank placements ended the week at 7.9% (based on what we have been offered by various banks), while the yield on the 91-day T-bill declined marginally by 1.6 bps to 7.1%. The average yield of the Top 5 Money Market Funds remained unchanged at 10.0%, similar to what was recorded the previous week. The yield on the Cytonn Money Market Fund remained unchanged at 10.6%, similar to what was recorded the previous week. The table below shows the Money Market Fund Yields for Kenyan Fund Managers as published on 28th May 2021:
Money Market Fund Yield for Fund Managers as published on 28th May 2021 |
|||
Rank |
Fund Manager |
Daily Yield |
Effective Annual Rate |
1 |
Cytonn Money Market Fund |
10.04% |
10.56% |
2 |
Nabo Africa Money Market Fund |
9.74% |
10.18% |
3 |
Zimele Money Market Fund |
9.56% |
9.91% |
4 |
GenCapHela Imara Money Market Fund |
9.45% |
9.91% |
5 |
Alphafrica Kaisha Money Market Fund |
9.22% |
9.62% |
6 |
CIC Money Market Fund |
9.05% |
9.38% |
7 |
Madison Money Market Fund |
8.90% |
9.31% |
8 |
Sanlam Money Market Fund |
8.79% |
9.19% |
9 |
Co-op Money Market Fund |
8.52% |
8.90% |
10 |
Dry Associates Money Market Fund |
8.27% |
8.60% |
11 |
British-American Money Market Fund |
8.27% |
8.59% |
12 |
Apollo Money Market Fund |
8.43% |
8.50% |
13 |
ICEA Lion Money Market Fund |
8.00% |
8.33% |
14 |
NCBA Money Market Fund |
8.03% |
8.33% |
15 |
Old Mutual Money Market Fund |
7.27% |
7.52% |
16 |
AA Kenya Shillings Fund |
6.23% |
6.41% |
Liquidity:
During the week, liquidity in the money market tightened, with the average interbank rate increasing marginally to 5.0%, from 4.9% recorded the previous week, partly attributable to tax remittances which partly offset Government payments. The average interbank volumes declined by 3.4% to Kshs 9.2 bn, from Kshs 9.5 bn recorded the previous week.
Kenya Eurobonds:
During the week, the yields on all Eurobonds declined, with the yields on the 10-year Eurobond issued in June 2014, 10-year bond issued in 2018, 30-year bond issued in 2018, 7-year bond issued in 2019 and 12-year bond issued in 2019 declining to 3.1%, 5.3%, 7.3%, 4.7% and 6.2%, from 3.2%, 5.6%, 7.5%, 4.8% and 6.4%, respectively. The decline in the yields was partly attributable to improved investor confidence, following the recent announcement by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) that it has reached a staff-level agreement with Kenya to enable the nation access a loan of USD 410.0 mn (Kshs 44.4 bn) to aid in stabilizing Kenya’s economy and create a sustainable growth path. Below is a summary of the performance:
Kenya Eurobond Performance |
|||||
|
2014 |
2018 |
2019 |
||
Date |
10-year issue |
10-year issue |
30-year issue |
7-year issue |
12-year issue |
31-Dec-2020 |
3.9% |
5.2% |
7.0% |
4.9% |
5.9% |
30-April-2021 |
3.2% |
5.7% |
7.7% |
5.0% |
6.7% |
20-May-21 |
3.2% |
5.6% |
7.5% |
4.8% |
6.4% |
21-May-21 |
3.1% |
5.4% |
7.4% |
4.7% |
6.3% |
24-May-21 |
3.1% |
5.4% |
7.4% |
4.7% |
6.2% |
25-May-21 |
3.1% |
5.4% |
7.4% |
4.7% |
6.2% |
26-May-21 |
3.0% |
5.3% |
7.3% |
4.7% |
6.2% |
27-May-21 |
3.1% |
5.3% |
7.3% |
4.7% |
6.2% |
Weekly Change |
(0.1%) |
(0.3%) |
(0.1%) |
(0.1%) |
(0.1%) |
MTD Change |
(0.2%) |
(0.4%) |
(0.3%) |
(0.3%) |
(0.4%) |
YTD Change |
(0.8%) |
0.1% |
0.3% |
(0.2%) |
0.3% |
Source: Reuters
Kenya Shilling:
During the week, the Kenyan shilling appreciated against the US dollar by 0.6% to close at Kshs 107.5, from Kshs 108.2 recorded the previous week, mainly due to adequate supply of dollars from exporters amid a drop in demand from commodity importers. On a YTD basis, the shilling has appreciated by 1.5% against the dollar, in comparison to the 7.7% depreciation recorded in 2020. Despite the recent appreciation of the shilling, we expect the shilling to remain under pressure in 2021 as a result of:
The shilling is however expected to be supported by:
Weekly Highlights:
During the week, the National Treasury gazetted the revenue and net expenditures for the first ten months of FY’2021/2021, ending on 30th April 2021. Below is a summary of the performance:
FY'2020/2021 Budget Outturn - As at 30th April 2021 |
|||
Amounts in Kshs billions unless stated otherwise |
|||
Item |
12-months Revised Estimates |
10-months Actual |
Percentage Achieved |
Opening Balance |
48.0 |
48.0 |
100.0% |
Tax Revenue |
1,469.7 |
1,190.6 |
81.0% |
Non-Tax Revenue |
124.3 |
81.0 |
65.2% |
External Loans & Grants |
418.8 |
112.5 |
26.9% |
Domestic Borrowings |
853.8 |
729.6 |
85.4% |
Other Domestic Financing |
28.5 |
19.6 |
68.7% |
Total Revenue |
2,943.2 |
2,181.3 |
74.1% |
Recurrent Exchequer issues |
1,084.4 |
826.0 |
76.2% |
CFS Exchequer Issues |
1,073.7 |
841.1 |
78.3% |
Development Expenditure & Net Lending |
401.4 |
258.2 |
64.3% |
County Governments +Contingencies |
383.6 |
239.8 |
62.5% |
Total Expenditure |
2,943.2 |
2,165.1 |
73.6% |
Fiscal Deficit excluding Grants |
(418.8) |
(96.4) |
23.0% |
Total Borrowing |
1,272.6 |
842.1 |
66.2% |
The key take-outs from the report include:
The revenue underperformance was expected given the ravaging effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the economy for most parts of 2020. However, the recent reversal of the tax incentives introduced earlier in 2020 has helped improve tax revenue collections, as seen by reported revenue out-performances in the first four months of 2021.
Additionally, the Government received USD 410.0 mn (Kshs 44.4 bn) from the recently announced IMF credit facility in May 2021 to help in stabilizing Kenya’s economy and create a sustainable growth path. Looking at tax revenue, we expect revenue collection to slow down in the remaining two months owing to the COVID-19 related movement restrictions that were put in place during the month of April and a relatively subdued but recovering business environment. In our view, we expect the government to fall short of its revenue target as it currently has Kshs 96.4 bn in deficits. With less than two months before the end of the current fiscal year, we believe that the government will continue to borrow aggressively in the domestic market and in turn might lead to an upward pressure on the yield curve.
We are projecting the y/y inflation rate for May 2021 to remain stable within the range of 5.6% - 5.9%, compared to 5.8% recorded in April 2021. The key drivers include:
Going forward, we expect the inflation rate to remain within the government set range of 2.5% - 7.5%.
Recently, the Cabinet Secretary for the National Treasury announced that they had presented the Finance Bill 2021 to Parliament for consideration. Some of the key points, including our take on each, include;
Overall, the Finance Bill 2021 is aimed at increasing revenue partly by encouraging manufacturing and industrial activities and increasing tax rates as seen in the case of ordinary bread.
Rates in the fixed income market have remained relatively stable due to the high liquidity in the money markets, coupled with the discipline by the Central Bank as they reject expensive bids. The government is 4.1% behind of its prorated borrowing target of Kshs 506.6 bn having borrowed Kshs 485.8 bn. In our view, due to the current subdued economic performance brought about by the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, the government will record a shortfall in revenue collection having collected Kshs. 1,190.6 bn as at 10 months to April 2021, compared to Kshs 1,224.8 bn prorated target collection for FY’2020/2021, thus leading to a larger budget deficit than the projected 7.5% of GDP. The high deficit and the lower credit rating from S&P Global to 'B' from 'B+' will mean that the government might be forced to borrow more from the domestic market which will ultimately create uncertainty in the interest rate environment. In our view, investors should be biased towards short-term fixed income securities to reduce duration risk.
During the week, the equities market was on an upward trajectory, with NSE 20, NASI and NSE 25 gaining by 0.2%, 4.2% and 3.5% respectively. This week’s performance took their YTD performance to gains of 13.6% and 8.9%, for NASI and NSE 25, respectively, and a loss of 0.5% for the NSE 20. The equities market performance was driven by gains recorded by stocks such as EABL, Safaricom and ABSA which gained by 7.0%, 5.9% and 4.6%, respectively. The gains were however weighed down by losses recorded by stocks such as Bamburi, Diamond Trust Bank (DTB-K) and BAT which lost by 7.2%, 5.9 and 1.3%, respectively.
Equities turnover increased by 56.7% to USD 46.3 mn, from USD 29.6 mn recorded the previous week, taking the YTD turnover to USD 509.3 mn. Foreign investors turned net buyers during the week, with a net buying position of USD 7.2 mn, from last week’s net selling position of USD 15.1 mn, taking the YTD net selling position to USD 15.7 mn.
The market is currently trading at a price to earnings ratio (P/E) of 14.2x, which is 10.2% above the 12-year historical average of 12.9x, and a dividend yield of 3.5%, 0.6% points below the historical average of 4.1%. NASI’s high P/E ratio of 14.2x is mainly attributable to the price rally seen during the week by most stocks and it’s the highest it has been since July 2018 when the market was trading at a P/E ratio of 14.3x. Key to note, NASI’s PEG ratio currently stands at 1.6x, an indication that the market is trading at a premium to its future earnings growth. Basically, a PEG ratio greater than 1.0x indicates that the market may be overvalued while a PEG ratio less than 1.0x indicates that the market is undervalued. The current P/E valuation of 14.2x is 84.8% above the most recent trough valuation of 7.7x experienced in the first week of August 2020. The charts below indicates the historical P/E and dividend yields of the market.
Weekly Highlight:
During the week, Safaricom Plc announced that the Ethiopian Communications Authority (ECA) had approved a bid for an Ethiopia Telco License which was submitted by a consortium including Safaricom, Vodacom Group Ltd, Vodafone Group Plc (UK), CDC Group Plc and Sumitomo Corporation. The consortium’s financial bid of USD 850.0 mn (Kshs 91.8 bn) will allow the consortium to operate a telecommunications network in Ethiopia, but will not include a license to operate mobile money. The term of the license will be 15 years with the right to apply for an additional 15 years. Safaricom will own 55.7% shareholding of the consortium, with Sumitomo, CDC and Vodacom having a shareholding of 27.2%, 10.9% and 6.2%, respectively. Key to note, MTN’s bid of USD 600.0 mn for the second Ethiopian license was deemed not sufficient and hence rejected by the ECA
In our view, the consortium, which plans to begin operations in 2022, will generate an additional revenue stream for Safaricom and reduce the company’s reliance on the Kenyan market. The joint bid also means that the venture will be less capital intensive for Safaricom since the four companies will share costs, although Safaricom, as the majority shareholder, will bear the greater cost. Ethiopia, with a population of 112.0 mn people according to World Bank data, presents an untapped market for internet connectivity, with 66.0% of the population being covered by mobile network but do not have mobile internet access. For more information on the bid, see our Cytonn Monthly – April 2021.
Earnings Releases
During the week, KCB Group, Equity Group, I&M Holdings, NCBA Group, Diamond Trust Bank Kenya (DTB-K), Standard Chartered Bank Kenya, and HF Group released their Q1’2021 financial results. Below is a summary of their performance;
Key Ratios
KCB Group Q1’2021 Key Highlights |
|||||
Balance Sheet |
|||||
Balance Sheet Items |
Q1’2020 (Kshs bn) |
Q1’2021 (Kshs bn) |
y/y change |
||
Net Loans and Advances |
553.9 |
597.1 |
7.8% |
||
Government Securities |
202.6 |
212.1 |
4.7% |
||
Total Assets |
947.1 |
977.5 |
3.2% |
||
Customer Deposits |
740.4 |
749.4 |
1.2% |
||
Deposits per Branch |
2.2 |
2.1 |
(1.9%) |
||
Total Liabilities |
811.5 |
830.0 |
2.3% |
||
Shareholders’ Funds |
135.5 |
147.5 |
8.8% |
||
Income Statement |
|||||
Income Statement Items |
Q1’2020 (Kshs bn) |
Q1’2021 (Kshs bn) |
y/y Change |
||
Net Interest Income |
15.1 |
16.7 |
11.1% |
||
Net non-Interest Income |
7.9 |
6.3 |
(20.0%) |
||
Total Operating income |
23.0 |
23.0 |
0.4% |
||
Loan Loss provision |
(2.90) |
(2.86) |
(1.3%) |
||
Total Operating expenses |
(14.0) |
(13.9) |
(0.8%) |
||
Profit before tax |
8.9 |
9.1 |
2.2% |
||
Profit after tax |
6.3 |
6.4 |
1.8% |
||
Core EPS |
1.95 |
1.98 |
1.8% |
||
Income Statement Ratios |
Q1’2020 |
Q1’2021 |
% point Change |
||
Yield from interest-earning assets |
10.8% |
10.9% |
0.1% |
||
Cost of funding |
2.8% |
2.6% |
(0.2%) |
||
Net Interest Margin |
8.1% |
8.4% |
0.3% |
||
Non-Performing Loans (NPL) Ratio |
11.1% |
14.9% |
3.8% |
||
NPL Coverage |
61.3% |
61.6% |
0.3% |
||
Cost to Income With LLP |
61.1% |
60.4% |
(0.7%) |
||
Loan to Deposit Ratio |
74.8% |
79.7% |
4.9% |
||
Cost to Income Without LLP |
48.5% |
48.0% |
(0.5%) |
||
Return on average equity |
20.1% |
13.9% |
(6.2%) |
||
Return on average assets |
3.1% |
2.0% |
(1.1%) |
||
Equity to Assets |
15.2% |
14.7% |
(0.5%) |
||
Capital Adequacy Ratios |
|||||
Ratios |
Q1’2020 |
Q1’2021 |
% point Change |
||
Core Capital/Total Liabilities |
17.1% |
19.2% |
2.1% |
||
Minimum Statutory ratio |
8.0% |
8.0% |
0.0% |
||
Excess |
9.1% |
11.2% |
2.1% |
||
Core Capital/Total Risk Weighted Assets |
17.1% |
18.2% |
1.1% |
||
Minimum Statutory ratio |
10.5% |
10.5% |
0.0% |
||
Excess |
6.6% |
7.7% |
1.1% |
||
Total Capital/Total Risk Weighted Assets |
19.0% |
21.8% |
2.8% |
||
Minimum Statutory ratio |
14.5% |
14.5% |
0.0% |
||
Excess |
4.5% |
7.3% |
2.8% |
Key take-outs from the earnings release include;
For a comprehensive analysis, please see our KCB Group Q1’2021 Earnings Note
Equity Group Q1’2021 Key Highlights |
|||
Balance Sheet |
|||
Balance Sheet items |
Q1’2020 (Kshs bns) |
Q1’2021 (Kshs bns) |
y/y change |
Government Securities |
157.6 |
183.0 |
16.1% |
Net Loans and Advances |
379.2 |
487.7 |
28.6% |
Total Assets |
693.2 |
1,066.4 |
53.8% |
Customer Deposits |
499.3 |
789.9 |
58.2% |
Deposits Per Branch |
1.7 |
2.4 |
41.3% |
Total Liabilities |
576.8 |
926.0 |
60.5% |
Shareholders’ Funds |
115.3 |
133.9 |
16.1% |
Income Statement |
|||
Income Statement Items |
Q1’2020 (Kshs bns) |
Q1’2021 (Kshs bns) |
y/y change |
Net Interest Income |
11.5 |
14.8 |
28.4% |
Net non-Interest Income |
8.3 |
10.9 |
30.7% |
Total Operating income |
19.9 |
25.7 |
29.3% |
Loan Loss provision |
(3.1) |
(1.3) |
(59.3%) |
Total Operating expenses |
(12.9) |
(14.0) |
8.7% |
Profit before tax |
7.0 |
11.7 |
67.1% |
Profit after tax |
5.3 |
8.7 |
63.8% |
Core EPS |
1.4 |
2.3 |
63.8% |
Key Ratios |
|||
Ratios |
Q1’2020 |
Q1’2021 |
% point change |
Yield from interest-earning assets |
11.0% |
10.3% |
(0.7%) |
Cost of funding |
3.0% |
2.8% |
(0.2%) |
Net Interest Margin |
8.2% |
7.6% |
(0.6%) |
Non- Performing Loans (NPL) Ratio |
11.2% |
12.1% |
0.9% |
NPL Coverage |
45.8% |
55.5% |
9.7% |
Cost to Income with LLP |
64.7% |
54.4% |
(10.3%) |
Loan to Deposit Ratio |
75.9% |
61.7% |
(14.2%) |
Return on Average Assets |
3.3% |
2.7% |
(0.6%) |
Return on Average Equity |
20.7% |
18.9% |
(1.8%) |
Equity to Assets |
16.2% |
14.2% |
(2.0%) |
Capital Adequacy Ratios |
|||
Ratios |
Q1'2020 |
Q1'2021 |
% point change |
Core Capital/Total Liabilities |
21.9% |
15.8% |
(6.1%) |
Minimum Statutory ratio |
8.0% |
8.0% |
0.0% |
Excess |
13.9% |
7.8% |
(6.1%) |
Core Capital/Total Risk Weighted Assets |
17.5% |
14.2% |
(3.3%) |
Minimum Statutory ratio |
10.5% |
10.5% |
0.0% |
Excess |
7.0% |
3.7% |
(6.1%) |
Total Capital/Total Risk Weighted Assets |
21.0% |
18.0% |
(3.0%) |
Minimum Statutory ratio |
14.5% |
14.5% |
0.0% |
Excess |
6.5% |
3.5% |
(3.0%) |
Key take-outs from the earnings release include;
For a comprehensive analysis, please see our Equity Group Q1’2021 Earnings Note
I&M Holdings Q1’2021 Key Highlights |
|||
Balance Sheet |
|||
Balance Sheet Items |
Q1’2020 (Kshs bn) |
Q1’2021 (Kshs bn) |
y/y change |
Government Securities |
54.1 |
102.4 |
89.5% |
Net Loans and Advances |
182.9 |
193.2 |
5.6% |
Total Assets |
336.0 |
364.4 |
8.5% |
Customer Deposits |
240.7 |
263.1 |
9.3% |
Deposits per branch |
3.6 |
4.0 |
11.0% |
Total Liabilities |
273.3 |
294.9 |
7.9% |
Shareholders’ Funds |
59.3 |
65.6 |
10.5% |
|
|
|
|
Income Statement |
|||
Income Statement Items |
Q1’2020 (Kshs bn) |
Q1’2021 (Kshs bn) |
y/y change |
Net Interest Income |
3.5 |
4.3 |
23.4% |
Net non-Interest Income |
2.2 |
1.8 |
(17.7%) |
Total Operating income |
5.7 |
6.1 |
7.4% |
Loan Loss provision |
(0.6) |
(0.8) |
36.7% |
Total Operating expenses |
(3.0) |
(3.6) |
18.0% |
Profit before tax |
2.5 |
2.7 |
7.0% |
Profit after tax |
1.7 |
1.9 |
13.5% |
Core EPS |
2.0 |
2.3 |
13.5% |
Key Ratios |
|||
Income statement ratios |
Q1'2020 |
Q1'2021 |
% point change |
Yield from interest-earning assets |
10.1% |
9.4% |
(0.7%) |
Cost of funding |
4.7% |
4.4% |
(0.3%) |
Net Interest Margin |
5.8% |
5.4% |
(0.4%) |
Non-Performing Loans (NPL) Ratio |
11.3% |
11.9% |
0.6% |
NPL Coverage |
58.8% |
61.1% |
2.3% |
Cost to Income With LLP |
52.9% |
58.0% |
5.1% |
Loan to Deposit Ratio |
76.0% |
73.4% |
(2.6%) |
Cost to Income Without LLP |
43.1% |
45.7% |
2.6% |
Return on average equity |
17.5% |
13.3% |
(4.2%) |
Return on average assets |
3.0% |
2.4% |
(0.6%) |
Equity to assets |
17.2% |
17.8% |
0.6% |
Capital Adequacy Ratios |
Q1'2020 |
Q1'2021 |
% Points change |
Core Capital/Total Liabilities |
21.8% |
22.3% |
0.5% |
Minimum Statutory ratio |
8.0% |
8.0% |
0.0% |
Excess |
13.8% |
14.3% |
0.5% |
Core Capital/Total Risk Weighted Assets |
16.8% |
18.1% |
1.3% |
Minimum Statutory ratio |
10.5% |
10.5% |
0.0% |
Excess |
6.3% |
7.6% |
1.3% |
Total Capital/Total Risk Weighted Assets |
21.1% |
21.6% |
0.5% |
Minimum Statutory ratio |
14.5% |
14.5% |
0.0% |
Excess |
6.6% |
7.1% |
0.5% |
Key take-outs from the earnings release include;
For a comprehensive analysis, please see our I&M Holdings Q1’2021 Earnings Note
Diamond Trust Bank (DTB-K) Q1’2021 Key Highlights |
|||
Balance Sheet |
|||
Balance Sheet items |
Q1’2020 (Kshs bns) |
Q1’2021 (Kshs bns) |
y/y change |
Government Securities |
128.2 |
138.4 |
7.9% |
Net Loans and Advances |
201.3 |
205.8 |
2.3% |
Total Assets |
385.0 |
417.3 |
8.4% |
Customer Deposits |
272.8 |
301.8 |
10.6% |
Deposits Per Branch |
2.0 |
2.3 |
10.6% |
Total Liabilities |
318.1 |
346.9 |
9.0% |
Shareholders’ Funds |
61.0 |
64.0 |
4.8% |
Income Statement |
|||
Income Statement Items |
Q1’2020 (Kshs bns) |
Q1’2021 (Kshs bns) |
y/y change |
Net Interest Income |
4.7 |
5.0 |
6.2% |
Net non-Interest Income |
1.6 |
1.6 |
(1.9%) |
Total Operating income |
6.3 |
6.5 |
4.1% |
Loan Loss provision |
0.4 |
0.7 |
67.7% |
Total Operating expenses |
3.3 |
3.5 |
6.1% |
Profit before tax |
3.0 |
3.0 |
1.3% |
Profit after tax |
2.0 |
2.1 |
0.5% |
Core EPS |
7.3 |
7.3 |
0.5% |
Key Ratios |
|||
Ratios |
Q1’2020 |
Q1’2021 |
% point change |
Yield from interest-earning assets |
9.8% |
9.0% |
(0.8%) |
Cost of funding |
4.5% |
4.0% |
(0.5%) |
Net Interest Margin |
5.7% |
5.3% |
(0.4%) |
Non- Performing Loans (NPL) Ratio |
8.0% |
10.6% |
2.6% |
NPL Coverage |
42.1% |
46.5% |
4.4% |
Cost to Income with LLP |
52.9% |
54.0% |
1.1% |
Loan to Deposit Ratio |
73.8% |
68.2% |
(5.6%) |
Return on average assets |
1.9% |
0.9% |
(1.1%) |
Return on average equity |
12.6% |
5.7% |
(6.9%) |
Equity to Assets |
15.4% |
15.6% |
0.2% |
Capital Adequacy Ratios |
|||
Ratios |
Q1'2020 |
Q1'2021 |
% point change |
Core Capital/Total Liabilities |
23.7% |
22.8% |
(0.9%) |
Minimum Statutory ratio |
8.0% |
8.0% |
0.0% |
Excess |
15.7% |
14.8% |
(0.9%) |
Core Capital/Total Risk Weighted Assets |
19.3% |
20.8% |
1.5% |
Minimum Statutory ratio |
10.5% |
10.5% |
0.0% |
Excess |
8.8% |
10.3% |
1.5% |
Total Capital/Total Risk Weighted Assets |
21.0% |
22.4% |
1.4% |
Minimum Statutory ratio |
14.5% |
14.5% |
0.0% |
Excess |
6.5% |
7.9% |
1.4% |
Key take-outs from the earnings release include;
For a comprehensive analysis, please see our Diamond Trust Bank (DTB-K) Q1’2021 Earnings Note
NCBA Group Q1’2021 Key Highlights |
|||
Balance Sheet |
|||
Balance Sheet items |
Q1’2020 (Kshs bns) |
Q1’2021 (Kshs bns) |
y/y change |
Government Securities |
136.5 |
157.1 |
15.1% |
Net Loans and Advances |
245.9 |
243.1 |
(1.1%) |
Total Assets |
509.6 |
542.1 |
6.4% |
Customer Deposits |
390.5 |
434.2 |
11.2% |
Deposits Per Branch |
5.6 |
6.2 |
11.2% |
Total Liabilities |
440.8 |
467.5 |
6.1% |
Shareholders’ Funds |
68.6 |
74.4 |
8.5% |
Income Statement |
|||
Income Statement Items |
Q1’2020 (Kshs bns) |
Q1’2021 (Kshs bns) |
y/y change |
Net Interest Income |
5.5 |
6.6 |
19.9% |
Net non-Interest Income |
5.4 |
5.2 |
(3.3%) |
Total Operating income |
10.9 |
11.8 |
8.3% |
Loan Loss provision |
3.8 |
2.6 |
(30.1%) |
Total Operating expenses |
8.3 |
7.8 |
(6.5%) |
Profit before tax |
2.4 |
3.9 |
60.2% |
Profit after tax |
1.6 |
2.8 |
73.8% |
Core EPS |
1.0 |
1.7 |
73.8% |
Key Ratios |
|||
Ratios |
Q1’2020 |
Q1’2021 |
% point change |
Yield from interest-earning assets |
6.3% |
10.0% |
3.7% |
Cost of funding |
3.1% |
4.2% |
1.1% |
Net Interest Margin |
3.3% |
5.9% |
2.6% |
Non- Performing Loans (NPL) Ratio |
14.5% |
14.7% |
0.2% |
NPL Coverage |
54.5% |
65.0% |
10.5% |
Cost to Income with LLP |
76.1% |
65.6% |
10.5% |
Loan to Deposit Ratio |
63.0% |
56.0% |
(7.0%) |
Return on average assets |
1.5% |
1.1% |
(0.4%) |
Return on average equity |
10.7% |
8.1% |
(2.6%) |
Equity to Assets |
13.9% |
13.6% |
(0.3%) |
Capital Adequacy Ratios |
|||
Ratios |
Q1'2020 |
Q1'2021 |
% point change |
Core Capital/Total Liabilities |
17.4% |
15.6% |
(1.8%) |
Minimum Statutory ratio |
8.0% |
8.0% |
0.0% |
Excess |
9.4% |
7.6% |
(1.8%) |
Core Capital/Total Risk Weighted Assets |
17.9% |
18.2% |
0.3% |
Minimum Statutory ratio |
10.5% |
10.5% |
0.0% |
Excess |
7.4% |
7.7% |
0.3% |
Total Capital/Total Risk Weighted Assets |
18.5% |
18.3% |
(0.2%) |
Minimum Statutory ratio |
14.5% |
14.5% |
0.0% |
Excess |
4.0% |
3.8% |
(0.2%) |
Key take-outs from the earnings release include;
For a comprehensive analysis, please see our NCBA Group Q1’2021 Earnings Note
Standard Chartered Bank Kenya Q1’2021 Key Highlights |
|||
Balance Sheet |
|||
Balance Sheet items |
Q1’2020 (Kshs bns) |
Q1’2021 (Kshs bns) |
y/y change |
Government Securities |
95.0 |
102.4 |
7.8% |
Net Loans and Advances |
125.5 |
117.9 |
(6.1%) |
Total Assets |
311.5 |
339.3 |
8.9% |
Customer Deposits |
243.6 |
265.2 |
8.9% |
Deposits per branch |
6.8 |
7.4 |
8.9% |
Total Liabilities |
261.6 |
286.4 |
9.4% |
Shareholders’ Funds |
49.8 |
52.9 |
6.1% |
Income Statement |
|||
Income Statement Items |
Q1’2020 (Kshs bns) |
Q1’2021 (Kshs bns) |
y/y change |
Net Interest Income |
4.7 |
4.6 |
(2.8%) |
Net non-Interest Income |
2.2 |
2.5 |
11.1% |
Total Operating income |
7.0 |
7.1 |
1.7% |
Loan Loss provision |
0.4 |
0.4 |
(3.5%) |
Total Operating expenses |
4.0 |
3.7 |
(9.0%) |
Profit before tax |
2.9 |
3.4 |
16.6% |
Profit after tax |
2.0 |
2.4 |
18.9% |
Core EPS |
5.3 |
6.3 |
18.9% |
Key Ratios |
|||
Ratios |
Q1’2020 |
Q1’2021 |
% point change |
Yield from interest-earning assets |
9.4% |
8.1% |
(1.3%) |
Cost of funding |
2.4% |
1.6% |
(0.8%) |
Net Interest Margin |
7.2% |
6.7% |
(0.6%) |
Non- Performing Loans (NPL) Ratio |
14.2% |
16.4% |
2.2% |
NPL Coverage |
78.1% |
81.1% |
3.0% |
Cost to Income with LLP |
58.1% |
52.0% |
(6.1%) |
Loan to Deposit Ratio |
51.5% |
44.4% |
(7.1%) |
Return on average assets |
2.6% |
1.8% |
(0.8%) |
Return on average equity |
15.8% |
11.3% |
(4.5%) |
Equity to Assets |
16.1% |
15.8% |
(0.3%) |
Capital Adequacy Ratios |
|||
Ratios |
Q1'2020 |
Q1'2021 |
% point change |
Core Capital/Total Liabilities |
15.1% |
15.1% |
0.0% |
Minimum Statutory ratio |
8.0% |
8.0% |
0.0% |
Excess |
7.1% |
7.1% |
0.0% |
Core Capital/Total Risk Weighted Assets |
15.0% |
15.9% |
0.9% |
Minimum Statutory ratio |
10.5% |
10.5% |
0.0% |
Excess |
4.5% |
5.4% |
0.9% |
Total Capital/Total Risk Weighted Assets |
18.0% |
18.3% |
0.3% |
Minimum Statutory ratio |
14.5% |
14.5% |
0.0% |
Excess |
3.5% |
3.8% |
0.3% |
Key take-outs from the earnings release include;
For a comprehensive analysis, please see our Standard Chartered Bank Kenya Q1’2021 Earnings Note
HF Group Q1’2021 Key Highlights |
|||
Balance Sheet |
|||
Balance Sheet items |
Q1’2020 (Kshs bns) |
Q1’2021 (Kshs bns) |
y/y change |
Government Securities |
5.0 |
5.7 |
13.4% |
Net loans |
38.4 |
35.8 |
(6.9%) |
Total Assets |
56.6 |
53.9 |
(4.7%) |
Customer Deposits |
38.0 |
37.2 |
(2.1%) |
Deposits per branch |
1.73 |
1.69 |
(2.1%) |
Total Liabilities |
46.4 |
45.7 |
(1.6%) |
Shareholder's Funds |
10.2 |
8.3 |
(18.9%) |
Income Statement |
|||
Income Statement Items |
Q1’2020 (Kshs bns) |
Q1’2021 (Kshs bns) |
y/y change |
Net Interest Income |
0.6 |
0.5 |
(18.3%) |
Net non-Interest Income |
0.3 |
0.1 |
(46.7%) |
Total Operating income |
0.8 |
0.6 |
(27.0%) |
Loan Loss provision |
(0.1) |
(0.1) |
(45.8%) |
Total Operating expenses |
(0.8) |
(0.8) |
(4.8%) |
Profit before tax |
0.0 |
(0.2) |
N/A |
Profit after tax |
(0.0) |
(0.2) |
N/A |
Core EPS |
(0.0) |
(0.5) |
N/A |
Key Ratios |
|||
Ratios |
Q1’2020 |
Q1’2021 |
% point change |
Yield from interest-earning assets |
11.2% |
9.3% |
(1.9%) |
Cost of funding |
6.5% |
5.1% |
(1.3%) |
Net Interest Margin |
4.5% |
4.1% |
(0.5%) |
Non- Performing Loans (NPL) Ratio |
27.3% |
24.7% |
(2.6%) |
NPL Coverage |
52.2% |
64.7% |
12.5% |
Cost to Income with LLP |
99.2% |
129.3% |
30.1% |
Loan to Deposit Ratio |
101.1% |
96.2% |
(4.9%) |
Return on average assets |
0.1% |
(3.4%) |
(3.5%) |
Return on average equity |
0.5% |
(20.4%) |
(20.9%) |
Capital Adequacy Ratios |
|||
Ratios |
Q1'2020 |
Q1'2021 |
% point change |
Core Capital/Total Liabilities |
14.4% |
7.4% |
(7.0%) |
Minimum Statutory ratio |
8.0% |
8.0% |
0.0% |
Excess |
6.4% |
(0.7%) |
(7.0%) |
Core Capital/Total Risk Weighted Assets |
12.4% |
6.4% |
(6.0)% |
Minimum Statutory ratio |
10.5% |
10.5% |
0.0% |
Excess |
1.9% |
(4.1%) |
(6.0%) |
Total Capital/Total Risk Weighted Assets |
13.7% |
9.9% |
(3.8%) |
Minimum Statutory ratio |
14.5% |
14.5% |
0.0% |
Excess |
(0.8%) |
(4.7%) |
(3.8%) |
Key take-outs from the earnings release include;
For a comprehensive analysis, please see our HF Group Q1’2021 Earnings Note
Asset Quality
The table below is a summary of the asset quality for the companies that have released
Q1’2020 NPL Ratio** |
Q1’2021 NPL Ratio* |
Q1’2020 NPL Coverage** |
Q1’2021 NPL Coverage* |
% point change NPL Ratio |
% point change NPL Coverage |
|
Stanbic Bank |
12.1% |
15.10% |
59.3% |
63.9% |
3.0% |
4.6% |
KCB |
11.1% |
14.9% |
61.3% |
61.6% |
3.8% |
0.3% |
SCBK |
14.2% |
16.4% |
78.1% |
81.1% |
2.2% |
3.0% |
Equity Group |
11.2% |
12.1% |
45.8% |
55.5% |
0.9% |
9.7% |
Co-op Bank |
10.8% |
16.9% |
54.8% |
58.4% |
6.1% |
3.6% |
DTB-K |
8.0% |
10.6% |
42.4% |
46.5% |
2.6% |
4.1% |
ABSA |
8.1% |
7.5% |
64.5% |
74.3% |
(0.6%) |
9.8% |
NCBA Group |
14.5% |
14.7% |
54.5% |
65.0% |
0.2% |
10.5% |
I&M Holdings |
11.3% |
11.9% |
58.8% |
61.1% |
0.6% |
2.3% |
HF Group |
27.3% |
24.70% |
52.2% |
64.7% |
(2.6%) |
12.5% |
Mkt Weighted Average |
11.4% |
13.5% |
57.4% |
62.1% |
2.1% |
4.7% |
*Market cap weighted as at 28/05/2021 **Market cap weighted as at 02/06/2020 |
Key take-outs from the table include;
Summary Performance
The table below highlights the performance of the banks that have released so far, showing the performance using several metrics, and the key take-outs of the performance;
Bank |
Core EPS Growth |
Interest Income Growth |
Interest Expense Growth |
Net Interest Income Growth |
Net Interest Margin |
Non-Funded Income Growth |
NFI to Total Operating Income |
Growth in Total Fees & Commissions |
Deposit Growth |
Growth in Government Securities |
Loan to Deposit Ratio |
Loan Growth |
Return on Average Equity |
Stanbic |
23.1% |
0.5% |
(7.3%) |
5.0% |
6.1% |
19.3% |
46.7% |
(8.5%) |
10.6% |
42.3% |
69.5% |
(2.4%) |
13.2% |
KCB |
1.80% |
8.7% |
1.8% |
11.1% |
8.4% |
(20.0%) |
27.4% |
(26.5%) |
1.2% |
4.7% |
79.7% |
7.8% |
13.9% |
SCBK |
18.9% |
(9.0%) |
(30.2%) |
(2.8%) |
6.7% |
11.1% |
35.1% |
11.7% |
8.9% |
7.8% |
44.4% |
(6.1%) |
11.3% |
Equity |
63.8% |
31.9% |
42.4% |
28.4% |
7.6% |
30.7% |
42.3% |
21.5% |
58.2% |
16.1% |
61.7% |
28.6% |
18.9% |
Co-op |
(3.7%) |
27.6% |
19.8% |
30.7% |
8.6% |
(9.2%) |
32.0% |
(15.7%) |
16.0% |
43.4% |
75.7% |
8.0% |
12.3% |
DTB-K |
0.50% |
4.8% |
2.9% |
6.2% |
5.3% |
(1.9%) |
23.9% |
(20.5%) |
10.6% |
7.9% |
68.2% |
2.3% |
5.7% |
ABSA |
23.7% |
(0.3%) |
17.6% |
5.9% |
7.0% |
(3.9%) |
32.0% |
7.4% |
7.7% |
1.1% |
84.9% |
7.5% |
13.6% |
NCBA |
73.8% |
8.1% |
(5.7%) |
19.9% |
5.9% |
(3.3%) |
44.3% |
(8.1%) |
11.2% |
15.1% |
56.0% |
(1.1%) |
8.1% |
I&Ms |
13.5% |
10.2% |
(5.2%) |
23.4% |
5.4% |
(17.7%) |
29.7% |
(5.3%) |
9.3% |
89.5% |
73.4% |
5.6% |
13.3% |
HF |
N/A |
(18.7%) |
(19.0%) |
(18.3%) |
4.1% |
(46.7%) |
22.0% |
(36.2%) |
(2.1%) |
13.4% |
96.2% |
(6.9%) |
(20.4%) |
Q1'21 Mkt Weighted Average* |
28.6% |
14.8% |
13.1% |
17.3% |
7.4% |
3.4% |
35.4% |
(2.5%) |
22.0% |
18.2% |
69.1% |
11.1% |
14.1% |
Q1'20 Mkt Weighted Average** |
(7.4%) |
8.2% |
11.4% |
7.4% |
7.2% |
15.9% |
22.7% |
24.5% |
14.3% |
14.9% |
74.1% |
14.1% |
17.2% |
*Market cap weighted as at 28/05/2021 |
|||||||||||||
**Market cap weighted as at 02/06/2020 |
Key takeaways from the table above include:
Universe of Coverage
Below is a summary of our universe of coverage and the recommendations:
Company |
Price at 21/5/2021 |
Price at 28/5/2021 |
w/w change |
YTD Change |
Year Open 2021 |
Target Price* |
Dividend Yield |
Upside/ Downside** |
P/TBv Multiple |
Recommendation |
I&M Holdings*** |
23.4 |
21.6 |
(7.7%) |
(52.0%) |
44.9 |
29.9 |
10.4% |
49.2% |
0.3x |
Buy |
Diamond Trust Bank*** |
63.8 |
60.0 |
(5.9%) |
(21.8%) |
76.8 |
84.3 |
0.0% |
40.5% |
0.3x |
Buy |
Standard Chartered*** |
131.5 |
130.0 |
(1.1%) |
(10.0%) |
144.5 |
164.4 |
8.1% |
34.5% |
0.9x |
Buy |
Stanbic Holdings |
81.0 |
79.5 |
(1.9%) |
(6.5%) |
85.0 |
99.4 |
4.8% |
29.8% |
0.8x |
Buy |
Jubilee Holdings |
280.0 |
280.0 |
0.0% |
1.5% |
275.8 |
330.9 |
3.2% |
21.4% |
0.6x |
Buy |
Co-op Bank*** |
12.3 |
12.2 |
(0.8%) |
(3.2%) |
12.6 |
13.6 |
8.2% |
20.2% |
0.8x |
Buy |
KCB Group*** |
41.0 |
42.4 |
3.4% |
10.4% |
38.4 |
49.8 |
2.4% |
19.8% |
1.0x |
Accumulate |
Liberty Holdings |
7.4 |
7.0 |
(4.9%) |
(8.6%) |
7.7 |
8.4 |
0.0% |
19.3% |
0.5x |
Accumulate |
NCBA*** |
24.9 |
25.5 |
2.4% |
(4.3%) |
26.6 |
28.4 |
5.9% |
17.5% |
0.6x |
Accumulate |
Equity Group*** |
41.5 |
43.0 |
3.6% |
18.6% |
36.3 |
49.5 |
0.0% |
15.1% |
1.3x |
Accumulate |
Sanlam |
11.3 |
11.0 |
(2.7%) |
(15.4%) |
13.0 |
12.4 |
0.0% |
12.7% |
1.0x |
Accumulate |
ABSA Bank*** |
9.1 |
9.5 |
4.6% |
0.0% |
9.5 |
10.2 |
0.0% |
7.1% |
1.1x |
Hold |
HF Group |
3.6 |
3.9 |
6.4% |
22.6% |
3.1 |
3.8 |
0.0% |
(1.3%) |
0.2x |
Sell |
Britam |
7.3 |
7.2 |
(0.3%) |
3.4% |
7.0 |
6.7 |
0.0% |
(7.5%) |
1.3x |
Sell |
CIC Group |
2.1 |
2.1 |
0.5% |
1.4% |
2.1 |
1.8 |
0.0% |
(15.9%) |
0.7x |
Sell |
*Target Price as per Cytonn Analyst estimates **Upside/ (Downside) is adjusted for Dividend Yield ***For Disclosure, these are stocks in which Cytonn and/or its affiliates are invested in. Key to note, I&M Holdings YTD share price change is mainly attributable to counter trading ex-bonus issue. |
We are “Neutral” on the Equities markets in the short term. With the market currently trading at a premium to its future growth (PEG Ratio at 1.6x), we believe that investors should reposition towards companies with a strong earnings growth and are trading at discounts to their intrinsic value. Additionally, we expect the recent discovery of new strains of COVID-19 coupled with the introduction of strict lockdown measures in major economies to continue dampening the economic outlook.
During the week, the Central Bank of Kenya (CBK), released the Bank Supervision Annual Report 2020, highlighting that the residential mortgage market recorded a 3.7% decline in the number of mortgage loans accounts in the market, to 26,971 in December 2020 from 27,993 in December 2019. The overall value of mortgage loans outstanding therefore registered a 2.1% decline from Kshs 237.7 bn in December 2019 to Kshs 232.7 bn in December 2020. The performance decline of the mortgage market was mainly attributed to repayment defaults and fewer mortgage loans advanced by banks due to the effect of the Covid-19 depressed economy.
The graph below shows the number of mortgage loan accounts in Kenya over the last 10 years;
Source: Central Bank of Kenya (CBK)
Development of the mortgage market in Kenya continues to face impediments such as i) high interest rates currently at 10.9%, ii) low income levels leading to low mortgage affordability, iii) high initial costs when taking mortgages, and, iv) high property and development costs. However, according to CBK’s report, the average mortgage loan size increased from Kshs 8.5 mn in 2019 to Kshs 8.6 mn in 2020, with the government having made efforts to avail relatively affordable mortgage facilities through the Kenya Mortgage and Refinance Company (KMRC) as banks tightened credit standards to the mortgage market.
The graph below shows the average mortgage loan size from 2011 to 2020;
Source: Central Bank of Kenya (CBK)
With an average mortgage size of Kshs 8.6 mn, an average interest rate of 10.9% and a maximum tenor of 20 years, one is required to make monthly repayments of approximately Kshs 88,183 per month which is unaffordable assuming a gross salary of Kshs 50,000 per month. Given the above, the Kenya mortgage to GDP ratio has continued to lag behind at 2.2% as of 2020 compared to countries such as Namibia and South Africa at 25.5% and 19.9%, respectively as shown in the graph below;
Source: Centre of Affordable Housing Africa
We expect continued subdued performance of the mortgage market, however activities in the mortgage market will be boosted by the government’s efforts through operationalization of the Kenya Mortgage Refinance Company (KMRC), having been allocated Kshs 4.2 bn in March 2021 to finance the Affordable Housing Program aimed at increasing home ownership in Kenya.
During the week, Kenya Airports Authority announced that JKIA passenger movement registered a 24.1% decline in the month of March 2021, to 279,413 passengers from 368,279 passengers in the same period last year. The trend was also observed at the Moi International Airport (MIA) in Mombasa, where the passenger movement declined by 8.8% to 71,180 passengers from 78,056 passengers in March 2020. The declines were attributed to travel bans and restrictions geared towards curbing the spread of Covid-19. Data from the Kenya National Bureau of Statistics indicates that arrivals though JKIA and MIA declined by 25.5% from 47,038 in January 2021 to 35,052 in February 2021.
The graph below shows the number of international arrivals in Kenya from January 2020 to February 2021;
Source: Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (KNBS)
With the decline of international arrivals, the hospitality sector performance continues to be affected due to its reliance on the tourism sector, as well as the reduction in the Meetings, Incentives, Conferences, and Exhibitions (MICE). Moreover, the lower allocation of the government’s budget to the Ministry of Tourism from Kshs 20.4 bn in FY’2020/21 to Kshs 18.1 bn in FY’2021/22 is expected to impede the sector’s performance even more.
During the week, Nairobi’s City Hall announced plans to conduct public participation into the New Draft Valuation Roll, on 16th June 2021 in the 17 sub-counties in Nairobi, to pave way for its roll-out, since being tabled before the Nairobi County Assembly in February. The public participation forum will inform the final percentage to be charged as rates on all ratable properties in Nairobi. This announcement follows the government’s plan to replace the outdated Valuation for Rating Act of 1956 and the Rating Act of 1963, in a bid to determine new land rates and ensure inclusion of more property owners into the tax bracket. Some of the provisions under the new draft valuation roll are; i) that the new land rates be set between 0.10% and 0.12% of the current value of undeveloped land which will boost the cost of levies, ii) that ratable properties that were not captured in the old valuation roll of 1980 be captured in the new records, and, iii) that the Geographic Information System (GIS) be introduced to replace the slow and cumbersome manual data management system. The GIS is a computer based system that will allow collection, organization, manipulation and analysis of data that is related to a particular location. The system will minimize the cost and complexity of preparing the valuation roll and allow more efficient collection of land rates.
City Hall is seeking to cash in on the sharp appreciation of land prices in Nairobi over the past two decades due to an increase in real estate deals in the capital, with our Cytonn Q1’2021 Markets Review, indicating that land prices in the Nairobi Metropolitan Area registered an annualized capital appreciation of 2.8% y/y. Property owners currently pay land rates at 25.0% of the unimproved site value based on the 1980 valuation roll which has led City Hall to miss out on revenue from the appreciation of plots.
In our view, the bringing up to date of the property valuation roll will; i) boost revenue collection by county governments by tapping into the rise in property values, and, ii) improve land information records through the updated valuation to capture the correct property values. The government through the Ministry of Lands has been undertaking other projects that will improve property transactions such as; i) digitization of land records through the National Lands Information Management System (NLIMS) to improve on transparency in land transactions and make them more efficient, iii) introducing a titling program that targets to resolve land ownership disputes that have contributed to locking out land owners and businesses from accessing credit facilities from financial institutions, iv) working on a new Land Valuation Index to guide land valuations for investment and other purposes across the country, and, v) decentralization of services by the Ministry of Lands by the construction of new Land Registries in Kitui, Mbeere, Bomet and Ol Kalou.
We expect the measures the government is putting in place to improve the transparency, ease and confidence in land transactions carried out in the country. These improvements are also expected to improve the accuracy of land records and enhance revenue collection which the county governments can utilize for development in areas such as infrastructure thus boosting the prospects of the real estate sector in Kenya.
We expect the real estate sector to continue being affected by challenges such as poor mortgage uptake, reduced international arrivals and inadequate regulatory framework for land valuations. However, we expect government efforts in addressing the issues will lead to increased activities and improved performance in the long run.
Following the release of the FY’2020 results by Kenyan insurance firms, the Cytonn Financial Services Research Team undertook an analysis on the financial performance of the listed insurance companies and the key factors that drove the performance of the sector. In this report, we assess the main trends in the sector, and areas that will be crucial for growth and stability going forward, seeking to give a view on which insurance firms are the most attractive and stable for investment. As a result, we shall address the following:
Section I: Introduction
Insurance uptake in Kenya remains low compared to other key economies with the insurance penetration in at 2.4% according to 2020 Financial Stability Report by Central Bank of Kenya (CBK). The low penetration level, which is below the global average of 7.2%, is attributable to the fact that insurance uptake is still seen as a luxury and mostly taken when it is necessary or a regulatory requirement.
The chart below shows the insurance penetration in other economies across Africa:
Section II: Key Themes that Shaped the Insurance Sector in FY’2020
FY’2020 was marked by the global social and economic shocks from the COVID-19 pandemic. Amid this operating environment, the insurance sector was impacted through i) increased insurance claims at 52.7% in Q4’2020 against 48.8% in Q4’2019, ii) reduction in premiums, and, iii) the poor performance in the stock market as evidenced by the NASI index declining by 8.6% in 2020. The Kenyan economy contracted in both Q2’2020 and Q3’2020 by 5.7% and 1.1%, respectively, with the financial services sector and insurance sector registering a reduced growth by to 5.3% in Q3’2020, from 7.6% growth in Q3’2019.
Key highlights from the industry performance:
On valuations, listed insurance companies are trading at a price to book (P/Bv) of 0.8x, lower than listed banks at 0.9x, their 15-year historical averages of 1.5x. This two sectors are attractive for long-term investors supported by the strong economic fundamentals.
In the last five years, the life insurance market in Kenya has experienced growth in both the level of direct premiums as well as in the equity held by the industry constituents shaped by the following themes;
The key themes that have driven the insurance sector include:
Although the industry has been slow in adopting digital trends, the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in FY’2020 saw the adoption of digital distribution of insurance products as a matter of necessity. Consequently, many insurance companies increasingly took advantage of the available digital channels to drive growth and increase insurance penetration in the country. The current number of mobile data subscribers, according to Communications Authority of Kenya (CAK), stands at 40.9 mn and is expected to grow to 60.0 mn subscribers in 5 years. The high mobile penetration implies that Mobile phones offer a new way of distributing insurance products to the younger generation of consumers and those consumers that have not been served through traditional distribution methods. Given that the process of handling and inspecting claims manually is cumbersome and imperfect, the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) assists in investigating the legitimacy of claims and identifying those that are fraudulent. An example is Liberty Holdings which has been using AI to rollout e-policy documents, self-services for retail customers and collect customer feedback.
To ensure that the sector benefits from a globally competitive financial services sector, the regulator has been working through regulation implementations to address some of the perennial, as well as emerging problems in the sector. The COVID-19 environment proved challenging especially on the regulatory front, as it was a balance between remaining prudent as an underwriter and adhering to the set regulations given the negative effect the pandemic. Regulations used for the insurance sector in Kenya include the Insurance Act cap 487 and its accompanying schedule and regulations. In FY’2020, regulation remained a key aspect affecting the insurance sector and the key themes in the regulatory environment include;
The move to a risk based capital adequacy framework will likely lead to capital raising initiatives mostly by the small players in the sector to shore up their capital. With the new capital adequacy assessment framework, capital is likely to be critical to ensuring stability and solvency of the sector to ensure the businesses are a going concern. In September 2020, Jubilee Holdings announced a strategic transaction with Allianz, a German multinational Underwriter and asset manager for the sale of 66.0% stake in the general business excluding medical for a total consideration of Kshs 10.8 bn. We expect that this amount will be ploughed back in to the company as part of the capital boost to grow other business lines. For more information, please see our analysis on the same on Cytonn Q3’2020 Markets Review
Section III: Industry Highlights and Challenges
Following the stable growth achieved by the insurance sector over the last decade, we expect the sector to transition into a more stable sector on the back of an improving economy and heightened regulations, which will enhance the capacity of the sector to sustain profitability. The following activities were undertaken by the Insurance Regulatory Authority (IRA), in line with their mandate of regulating and promoting development of the insurance sector;
In FY’2020, IRA issued 11.0 circulars ranging from COVID-19 Insurance Business Impact Template in Q2, Reporting of fire and engineering risks with sums insured above KES 1 billion and group life business. For example, in Q4’2020 the authority issued a circular numbered IC & RE 07/2020 to insurance companies, reinsurance companies and reinsurance brokers on dealings with reinsurers and reinsurance brokers that are not registered under the Insurance Act.
In FY’2020, 31.0 new or repackaged insurance products were filed by various insurance companies and approved by IRA. The onset of COVID-19 accelerated the repackaging of insurance products where 11 or 35.5% of the 31 products were medical plans, while life products accounted for 15 or 48.4% of the total repackaged products.
Industry Challenges:
Section IV: Performance of the Listed Insurance Sector in FY’2020
The table below highlights the performance of the listed insurance sector, showing the performance using several metrics, and the key take-outs of the performance.
Listed Insurance Companies FY'2020 Earnings and Growth Metrics |
||||||||
Insurance |
Core EPS Growth |
Net Premium growth |
Claims growth |
Loss Ratio |
Expense Ratio |
Combined Ratio |
ROaE |
ROaA |
Jubilee Insurance |
1.7% |
3.3% |
3.4% |
101.3% |
56.3% |
157.6% |
12.3% |
3.0% |
Liberty |
(2.0%) |
(2.9%) |
(0.4%) |
55.2% |
45.9% |
101.1% |
8.1% |
1.7% |
CIC |
(192.3%) |
(3.2%) |
(0.9%) |
71.4% |
50.1% |
121.5% |
(3.9%) |
(0.8%) |
Britam |
(357.2%) |
0.5% |
20.8% |
85.7% |
78.5% |
164.2% |
(39.2%) |
(6.9%) |
Sanlam |
(168.4%) |
21.3% |
18.5% |
83.7% |
54.2% |
137.9% |
(4.8%) |
0.3% |
*FY'2020 Weighted Average |
(157.9%) |
1.6% |
9.5% |
88.1% |
62.9% |
151.1% |
(9.4%) |
(1.3%) |
**FY'2019 Weighted Average |
6.4% |
10.2% |
16.3% |
79.4% |
56.8% |
136.2% |
11.9% |
3.3% |
*Market cap weighted as at 25/05/2021 |
|
|||||||
**Market cap weighted as at 17/07/2020 |
|
The key take-outs from the above table include;
Based on the Cytonn FY’2020 Insurance Report, we ranked insurance firms from a franchise value and from a future growth opportunity perspective with the former getting a weight of 40.0% and the latter a weight of 60.0%.
For the franchise value ranking, we included the earnings and growth metrics as well as the operating metrics shown in the table below in order to carry out a comprehensive review:
Bank |
Loss Ratio |
Expense Ratio |
Combined Ratio |
Return on Average Capital Employed |
Tangible Common Ratio |
Jubilee Holdings |
101.3% |
56.3% |
157.6% |
12.3% |
24.2% |
Sanlam Kenya |
83.7% |
54.2% |
137.9% |
(4.8%) |
5.1% |
Liberty Holdings |
55.2% |
45.9% |
101.1% |
8.1% |
19.2% |
Britam Holdings |
85.7% |
78.5% |
164.2% |
(39.2%) |
11.2% |
CIC Group |
71.4% |
50.1% |
121.5% |
4.1% |
19.2% |
Weighted Average FY'2020 |
98.7% |
56.5% |
155.2% |
10.1% |
22.9% |
The Intrinsic Valuation is computed through a combination of valuation techniques, with a weighting of 40.0% on Discounted Cash-flow Methods, 35.0% on Residual Income and 25.0% on Relative Valuation. The overall FY’2020 ranking is as shown in the table below:
Insurance Company |
Franchise Value Score |
Intrinsic Value Score |
Weighted Score |
FY'2020 Ranking |
FY'2019 Ranking |
Liberty Holdings |
15 |
2 |
7.2 |
1 |
3 |
Jubilee Holdings |
19 |
1 |
8.2 |
2 |
1 |
Sanlam Kenya |
22 |
3 |
10.6 |
3 |
4 |
CIC Group |
20 |
5 |
11.0 |
4 |
5 |
Britam Holdings |
29 |
4 |
14.0 |
5 |
2 |
Major Changes from the FY’2020 Ranking are;
Section V: Conclusion & Outlook of the Insurance Sector
The sector was suffering from declining penetration even before the pandemic and this was worsened by the interruptions caused by the pandemic. However, the sector continues to undergo transition where traditional models have been disrupted, mainly on the digital transformation and regulation front. We expect a moderate growth in premiums as underwriters come up with products suited to the pandemic period mostly in the medical and life businesses. On the other hand, the recovery and opening up of logistical barriers currently at play will see an increased uptake of motor vehicle and marine insurance. We are of the view that insurance companies have a lot they can do in order to register considerable growth and improve the level of penetration in the country to the 2019 continental average of 7.2%, some of this include:
For the FY’2020 Insurance Report, please download it here
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this publication are those of the writers where particulars are not warranted. This publication is meant for general information only and is not a warranty, representation, advice or solicitation of any nature. Readers are advised in all circumstances to seek the advice of a registered investment advisor.