Apr 12, 2020
Introduction:
The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic continues to increase with the number of cases rising and the number of deaths escalating. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), as of Friday, 10thApril 2020, the figures stood at 1,521,252 infections and 92,798 deaths. Closer home, Kenya’s numbers continue to grow with 184 confirmed cases and 7 deaths as at 10thApril 2020. Below is a summary of what we have written so far on the COVID-19 pandemic:
In this note, we focus on the options available to the Kenyan Government when it comes to managing the adverse economic effects brought about by the pandemic. Under this, we shall cover:
Section I: Kenya’s Economic Policy Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic
COVID-19 is first and foremost a public health problem, with the economic aspect being a secondary but important factor; consequently, the focus should be policies that will enhance public health even before implementing fiscal and monetary policy to inject the requisite liquidity and support into the markets. The priority should first be to ensure that it is safe for people to go out to work and to spend. However, in this note we are focused on the economic aspect.
The pandemic has so far had a negative financial impact and is expected to worsen as highlighted below:
The government of Kenya and the Central Bank have respectively announced fiscal and monetary measures to support the citizens and the Kenyan economy at large. Below we highlight some of the measures put in place so far to prevent the spread as well as cushion the economic disruptions arising from the pandemic:
Action |
|
Fiscal Policy
(Total amount of Fiscal action is currently estimated at Kshs 145 bn / 1.5% of GDP) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Monetary Policy |
|
|
|
|
In our view, the moves by the government are positive and quite pro-active but there is more to be done. In addition, the said policies would create some other challenges in terms of increasing the already constrained fiscal deficit. According to the FY’2019/20 Budget Policy Statement, the country’s fiscal deficit was estimated at 6.3%. This means that the government does not have the fiscal space to afford a borrow-and-spend fiscal stimulus. We are also pessimistic about the government’s ability to meet its revenue targets, putting into consideration the fact that the government raised its total revenue target by 14.2% to Kshs 2.1 tn for FY’2019/20, which it cannot meet in the current market conditions, and will thus exert pressure on the domestic borrowing front to plug in the deficit.
The National Treasury is working to establish a fund, COVID-19 Emergency Response Fund, whose purpose will be: (i) to fund the purchase of essential supplies to public hospitals and related institutions, health professionals and frontline workers as need arises, (ii) to fund programs and initiatives towards cushioning and provision of emergency relief to the most vulnerable, older and poor persons in urban informal settings, (iii) to support and stimulate MSMEs rendered vulnerable by the pandemic, (iv) to enhance the capacity of the relevant institutions in handling COVID-19 surveillance, and (v) to fund any emerging issue arising from the pandemic.
In the next section, we look at policies that have been implemented by other countries to see what we can borrow.
Section II: Policies That Have Been Implemented in Other Economies to Limit Possible Economic Fallouts Arising from the Pandemic
Some of the key measures implemented include (we have included in bold font the changes since our last update in our Topical here, and underlined what we think could have an impact if borrowed and adapted for Kenya:
Country |
Economic Measures Taken by the Government |
UK |
|
USA |
|
Italy |
|
Germany |
|
Section III: Additional Policy Options to be considered by the Kenyan Government
The government has the largest role to play in helping navigate the economy through this pandemic. This can be done by putting in place supportive rules and regulations that shall help protect and turn around the economy. We see five main additional actions that the government can explore:
We then analyze below, in detail the five additional actions that the government can explore:
Looking back at the Economic Stimulus Package (ESP) initiated by the government after the 2007/2008 post-election violence, which was put in place to pull the country out of an economic slump where the country’s GDP growth of 6.9% in 2007 had declined to 1.5% in 2008. The ESP was set up to “create demand” in the affected sectors through government spending. The package was split into two phases where the allocated budget for Phase I was Kshs 22.0 bn and Kshs 27.0 bn for Phase II, amounting to Kshs 49.0 bn, equivalent to 1.3% of GDP. This was directed towards the construction of schools, horticultural markets, juakali sheds and public health centers throughout the country.
A similar move will go a long way in helping the economy recover from the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. Having looked at what other countries have done, as we stated in the previous section, we have seen stimulus packages equal to an average of 7.5% of GDP as highlighted below:
Country |
GDP 2019 |
Stimulus Package |
% of GDP |
UK |
2,743.6 |
412.5 |
15.0% |
USA |
21,439.5 |
2,000.0 |
9.3% |
Italy |
1,988.6 |
27.5 |
1.4% |
Germany |
3,863.3 |
171.4 |
4.4% |
Kenya |
98.6 |
1.4 |
1.4% |
Average |
|
|
7.5% |
Source: IMF, amounts in US Dollars (Billions)
To this effect, the government can:
We believe that the focus should be to curb the immediate need, which is to contain the COVID-19 pandemic by setting up an ESP geared towards revamping the economy. As such, we recommend that the package amount to Kshs 100.6 bn, equivalent to 1% of GDP, given that the country currently cannot afford a large stimulus package similar to what we have seen other countries do.
Low-income households, consisting of families living below the poverty line, are among the most affected groups in the country mainly due to the imposed curfews and decline in business activities. According to the Kenya National Bureau of Statistics, low-income households represents 27.4% of the country’s population. This also includes laid-off workers and self-employed persons in the informal sector (e.g. barbers and hairdressers), who due to their hand-to-mouth lifestyle, will be left at a disadvantage. This relates most to families in Nairobi’s crowded and informal settlements where social distancing and working from home is not practical.
The table below shows the countries that have set aside funds to go towards affected individuals and workers and their amounts as a percentage of GDP:
Country |
GDP 2019 |
Amount set aside |
% of GDP |
USA |
21,439.5 |
500.0 |
2.3% |
Italy |
1,988.6 |
11.0 |
0.6% |
Average |
1.4% |
Source IMF, amounts in US Dollars (Billions)
Based on the table above, we believe that the country can set aside approximately Kshs 55.6 bn (equivalent to 0.6% of Kenya’s GDP) towards a “Lifeline Fund”. We have assumed the 0.6%, which a conservative approach having considered the government’s fiscal constraints.
One of the ways this has been done e.g. in the United states, is through the distribution of funds to affected households through direct payouts to their households, through checks based on the number of people in a house hold and the level of income. This might be impractical in the Kenyan context but we believe households can be cushioned through other ways such as: (i) zero-rating tax on essential supplies such as foodstuffs, for example: maize flour, cooking fat and rice, and, medical supplies such as masks, gloves, and sanitizers, and, (ii) reducing the taxes and levies charged on utilities such as electricity and water which are considered necessities, which would help citizens, especially those who might not benefit from the proposed income tax reliefs due to the nature of their wage earnings.
In the current state of affairs, the government’s mitigation strategies with regards to the ongoing pandemic have led to reduced incomes. The directive to work from home, closure of restaurants and clubs, and the curfew, which has resulted, to reduced working hours has forced some businesses to lay off workers or require them to take unpaid leave for an unspecified period. This has adversely affected businesses and the economy at large. To curb this, credit facilities and payroll support can be given to the affected sectors and businesses in an effort to reduce the closure of businesses and loss of jobs during this period. Considering what the United Kingdome and the United States have done, highlighted in section ii, the Kenyan government can:
The US set aside USD 500.0 bn towards these initiatives, equivalent to 2.3% of the country’s GDP. The Kenyan government can set aside about Kshs 100.6 bn, which is equivalent to 1.0% of Kenya’s GDP, having considered the current state of affairs with regards to government finances. Keeping these businesses alive will ultimately aid in a faster recovery once the situation is under control. As another option, the government can:
Given the fact that the country has been running a fiscal deficit of about 7.0% over the past six years, the country needs to work with development partners to be able to get the much-needed cash to cushion against the pandemic. So far, we have seen the World Bank give the Kenyan Government USD 60.0 mn (Kshs 6.1 bn) to help mobilize response capacity, strengthen multi-sector platforms and help in monitoring and evaluate the prevention and preparedness against the Coronavirus. Some of the other options available include:
Initiating a conversation on a possible debt moratoria or even forgiveness with its foreign debtors both on the bilateral and multilateral debt servicing as well as on the foreign commercial debt servicing. Given the current market conditions, with the volatility of the Kenyan shilling also in play, debt repayments would be more expensive and as such elevating the risk of a higher fiscal deficit. The debt relief will allow the government redirect funds to go towards the containment of the pandemic. To put this into context, if the government manages to push this year’s loan repayments to China’s Exim bank, which includes the SGR loan, they will free up approximately Kshs 71.4 bn, for the current fiscal period. In the 2020 Budget Policy Statement, Kshs 630.1bn had been allocated towards debt repayment in the FY’2020/21 budget (both principal and interest). By initiating some of these talks with our debtors, we believe come funds can be reallocated and be directed towards containing the pandemic.
Protection of incomes for both corporates and individuals is key. Given that the country is not like the developed markets such as the US where people can access social security if they are unemployed, the challenge then becomes how to ensure that livelihoods are not compromised.
Section IV: Conclusion
The country should try balance between providing the most required relief to businesses and individuals and ensuring that they do not impact tax collections much as that would mean a huge fiscal deficit and then it opens other challenges. So far, the government has announced tax relief through the reduction of tax rates for both individual and corporate incomes. In line with some recommendations from the Parliamentary Budget Office released during the week in their Special Bulleting COVID-19, the government can balance taxation measures with expenditure reduction to reduce pressure on our already constrained budget.
In addition to the ongoing public health initiatives, the government can also explore the following additional 5 options:
Finally, looking back at a period where the country was faced with sort of similar challenge, case in point: the 2007/08 Post-election Violence, the government put together an ESP that seemed to work. It is however important to note that during that period, according to data from the National Treasury, the Government’s fiscal deficit stood at 1.4% of GDP as at Q1’2007, compared to the 7.7% fiscal deficit for the FY’2018/19 financial year. This means that the government had more fiscal room to fund a stimulus package, coupled with readily available funding in both the local and financial markets, which is not the case today. It is to this effect we believe, the Government has proposed amendments to the Income Tax Act (ITA) 2020, where they have raised tax on some items with the aim of trying to balance the taxation measures hoping to maintain government revenue during this period of uncertainty.
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this publication are those of the writers where particulars are not warranted. This publication is meant for general information only and is not a warranty, representation, advice or solicitation of any nature. Readers are advised in all circumstances to seek the advice of a registered investment advisor.